dmcoco84

Ha, Yeah... affect... got me like a yawn. No, No, No... We Both Know That's Bull Shit. You and I are neighbors, and I just bought all that shite. How does it affect you, DIRECTLY? Tell me how it picks your pocket or breaks your leg...?

Darius... are you ready to watch Israel kick everyone's asses?

If right now, at this very moment, I walk out the door, drive to the store... and purchase 2 AR-15's, two parts kits, 20K rounds of 223, and a complete set of full body military body armor... ...how does that effect you? ? ---------------------------------------------------------- I'd want to know where you got a deal on 20k rounds of .223 ammo. Cause I want some too.

If right now, at this very moment, I walk out the door, drive to the store... and purchase 2 AR-15's, two parts kits, 20K rounds of 223, and a complete set of full body military body armor... ...how does that effect you? ?

We ARE... we are a post-constitutional nation. We need to return to the original experiment... the Constitution.

Two problems for your argument here. 1- you're citing the Declaration of Independence. Although certainly a key document from the time, it is the Constitution that matters. Wrong... we've been over this. And no one on this board has been able to cite what came right before the Declaration of Independence. You are wrong, JUST, LIKE, QUADE.

Meant to add one last thing: If right now, at this very moment, I walk out the door, drive to the store... and purchase 2 AR-15's, two parts kits, 20K rounds of 223, and a complete set of full body military body armor... ...how does that effect you?

Coherent. Thank You. To abide by the Constitution, your statement would need to be: Amend the Constitution: Repeal the 2nd Amendment, Pass and Ratify 28th Amendment; then through proper legal means collect all fire arms and then abide by 28th Amendment and evaluate. Amendments are never removed, they are repealed, to remind us of the scars of the past; our mistakes. And likely, the best wording to achieve your opinion of what needs to be done to fix what you see as a problem, would be WHAT I PERSONALLY PUT INTO QUADE'S MOUTH SINCE HE DIDN'T HAVE THE BALLS TO RESPOND, : A well regulated Militia, is not necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall be determined by a Federal panel of experts. This, would be legal... however, it's never gonna happen. So... aside from these points, this thread, is done. There is nothing else to say. Period. At least... I'm done.

Wrong... I have already addressed this; above and my past thread. First amendment is also not necessary for Freedom of Speech. You seem unable to be grasping the concept of Limited Government. What about my opinion makes you think I don't grasp the concept of "Limited Government" I simply don't agree the government serves no role in personal life. I firmly believe the government has a RESPONSIBILITY to provide laws and protections for everyone, such that I don't have to worry about being murdered at a rate 4x higher than the UK. In my opinion one of the fastest ways to bring our homicide rate in line with that of Europe, is to bring the number of guns in line with that of Europe. I see this as a perfect example of where the government should be working for the people. I simply do NOT agree that the governments role is to sit back and let any random asshole do whatever he pleases. What you just wrote here, proves flat out, you do not understand Limited Government. If you are not simply trolling, what you just wrote is absurd... and you are also confusing the things that actually are your opinions, with Constitutional Truths. Read this: DEFINED: Small and Limited Government Then read what I wrote, read what you wrote before it... and then re-read what you last wrote: Then I'll continue to respond, if you make coherent statements, or state that you don't want the US Constitution, you want a national government whose scope of influence has no bounds; the exact opposite of the Republic those old guys gave us.

You sure feel the need to attack the person opining much more than the opinion itself. Is that because you were raised improperly? It could matter... if he told me he was in his 40s and lived in Vermont, I would not be the least bit surprised.

Wrong... I have already addressed this; above and my past thread. First amendment is also not necessary for Freedom of Speech. You seem unable to be grasping the concept of Limited Government.

Big difference between a private company having data that I agree to do business with (subject to legally obtained warrants), like which he ridiculously describes (VISA), and what the Federal Government it ACTUALLY doing. And it is quite clear that no one on this board has been listening to Drake or Binney; NSA Whistle blowers. That entire interview is a slap in the face... And the administration has already done that which he states would be his "red line."

Oracle CEO Larry Ellison told CBS News’ Charlie Rose that he has no problem with the NSA’s massive surveillance programs. In fact, he said, the surveillance is “great” and “essential.” Douche Bag

Same here; Virginia. Not as big a pile as 17 trillion dollars.

How old are you, and where do you live? I'm very puzzled by you... ... and you are quite obsessed with "280 million".

You are right, which is why in those places people don't feel the need to do either of those things. Whatever... you are full of it. Like I said previously to a Canadian: I don't care about your country (other than for BASE)... Mind Your Business.

Additionally... WWII never would have happened, because Wilson wasn't President, so WWI never happened, and Hitler never would have happened... because no Wiemar Republic. And don't forget about the push for a Caliphate coming back in the middle east... no Barbary wars, so they got stronger too. However, at the same time, no guns, is different from no right to guns by non military...

You equate... "there is no such thing as peaceful freedom", toooo, everyone needs a gun?

uh... huh. Dude... that's ridiculous. Completely empty statement, and I do...

What?! And who has said everyone needs guns? I sure haven't... And, propaganda?

Han Solo's blaster >> Kirk's phaser. Especially the model that just looked like a small makeup box. Both Those Punks < < Phaser Rifle Picard > > Kirk

I'm sure you meant blasters. Let's not mix canons here. Your mom has a blaster. Phasers are better than blasters, but light sabers are cooler than phasers. Your cold hand comment was hilarious, btw.

Yeah, cause phasers were invented.

Reagan was a Progressive. Fuck Reagan... And the stupid BS you just posted.