pds

you know you are not going to get a rational answer to you questions, so give it up. it appears that the way to get off the troll's to do list is to shy away from subjective, rational and informed discussion and simply sink said troll's ship of fools with objective observations on said troll's methods of argument. i would say that 'specious' is far too generous. 'preposterous' maybe? sorry, gotta go get ready for dumbshit season....... cya. namaste, motherfucker.

http://www.knology.net/~ultimategarageband/Final%20Bird_1.mpg namaste, motherfucker.

Q: What do you say to a blonde with no arms and no legs? A: "Nice tits!" namaste, motherfucker.

who let the trolls out in my threads and in my sleep please dont feed the trolls namaste, motherfucker.

do they blow the horn at you when you land on the runway? lol. thats cool. havent seen a sim since 2000. namaste, motherfucker.

ok juan. ill bite. you are going to have to pay closer attention if you intend to assume an active role in this discussion. mikkey did NOT disclaim NK conflict that is 50 years in the past. mikkey did NOT claim that NK poses no risk. Quite the contrary. Repeatedly. mikkey DID claim that there is no oil in NK. Relatively speaking that is TRUE. and we are not going to execute a preemptive strike against korea. not now, not ever. that would be insanity. AND WTF DOES THE 1950'S NK CONFLICT HAVE TO DO WITH ANYTHING? and i have done nothing but refute faulty logic the entire thread. ok. im done. resume trolling. namaste, motherfucker.

did you hear something? namaste, motherfucker.

i can almost promise you will get the most mileage out of telling him the story. lol. im sure of it. namaste, motherfucker.

have you been drinking, juan? wtf are you talking about - again? lmao. namaste, motherfucker.

jumpers as hazards? wow. thats kickin. tried takin one out? namaste, motherfucker.

exactly. it is silly to think that there will be anything but a political exchange with NK. they learned how to deal with the US a long time ago. hurry up, get a nuke, and point it at the US. just my simpleminded conclusions. no need to flame. it is not proven. i have no sources. i do not even claim plausibility. i'm not actually sure i believe me. namaste, motherfucker.

im happy that your happy. namaste, motherfucker.

LIARS, ALL! namaste, motherfucker.

man o man. not military, but moved 15 times in 9 states before thirty. sometimes i feel like im missing something not having roots or a hometown. on the other hand i have always felt free to go anywhere anytime. namaste, motherfucker.

oh man, you mean you believe that? don't you watch foxnews? lmao. nice find. namaste, motherfucker.

BOOBIES!!!!!!!! technology is great, eh, jim. wonder if all the guys that little girl proclaims love for know about each other. lol. they are all on different servers. namaste, motherfucker.

Forums: Search Results Your search for boobies returned 8934 results Ouch! hey jim, he be talkin about google. 445,000 documents. lol. namaste, motherfucker.

good point, proffesor. lol. and we are not going to korea. that is just silly. namaste, motherfucker.

dude.. this has got to be the most gratuitous post i have seen in quite some time. right on par with "what is your dz.com username?" good work. namaste, motherfucker.

see you tomorrow, greenhorn. oh yeah, the thread.... lol. sep 28 will be a year. namaste, motherfucker.

wtf r u talking about, kyle? namaste, motherfucker.

uhh, could you elaborate on that, anne? thats quite a story. thanks. i feel like i know you. well enough not to piss you off with a rifle in reach, anyway. take care. sky namaste, motherfucker.

oh no! im not getting between you and anything you want. i like me in one piece. carry on. namaste, motherfucker.

i'll be there, but i know better than to try to 'force' you to do ANYTHING love you too. namaste, motherfucker.

LMAO sounds like thier 'expert' is logically challenged. he has no proof or he would not need to refute attempts to convince him. he could simply provide proof. 'they have no forensic evidence, this is true' - i admire his spunk. he is willing to posit his opinion as truth but knows better than to deny that there is no proof of a connection. 'But to say that there's no connection whatsoever, that is absolutely not true.' - hmmm, if something is 'absolutely not true' would imply that it is 'absolutely true'? im confused. didn't he just say that there is no proof? somebody help me. looks a lot like an EXPERT OPINION. the argument we are having is about PROOF. this thread wasnt started on the premise that there was NO proof. it was started on the premise that there IS proof. you can yell all day long that i cant prove that there is no connection. but, my logically challenged friend, it is your responsibility to show PROOF that there IS a connection. not even your buddies at FOXNEWS can help you there. try again, grasshopper. lmmfao. namaste, motherfucker.