-
Content
5,477 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
32 -
Feedback
0%
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Dropzones
Gear
Articles
Fatalities
Stolen
Indoor
Help
Downloads
Gallery
Blogs
Store
Videos
Classifieds
Everything posted by FLYJACK
-
I found lots of 95% Al, 5% Mg particles on the tie, this is called Magnalium and it comes in different ratio's but this ratio is softer and in powder form is primarily used in pyrotechnics, explosives, flares, rocket fuel.. In ratio's of more MG it is used to form airplane and auto parts. More Mg makes it more brittle. All these particles (this pic a sample, not all) indicate powder form exposure.. It may be from the "bomb".. flares or a firework.. Earlier, I had posted a match for many of the particles, a hand held sparkler.. It produces bright yellow white sparks. So, pyrotechnics is a big use, commercial, military or retail,, but I am looking for other uses..
-
Ulis has lost it as well.. he says he is applying science then builds an argument of conjecture and assumptions.. Gryder has just proved he is a fraud with that fake Cooper chute container.. The Reca/Peca narrative is completely ridiculous.. they don't even try to fit the evidence, make sense or be rational. It is a Vortex induced mass formation psychosis..
-
You still won't answer some of your claims.. that seems key to deception. Other than the unreliable tapes, what proof do you have that Reca/Peca either knew of Cossey, knew him personally or colluded with him. and when did Reca/Peca leave his family and go to Wa and when did he return to Mi.
-
Don't worry Slim,, it is not Cooper's container.. Gryder needed a slam dunk piece of evidence and he somehow found a container.. wherever he got it, it isn't the one Cooper used.. it doesn't match Hayden's and it doesn't match Cossey's false claim that it was his personal chute. I suspect Gryder may have planted it.. regardless, he got it wrong. Gryder pulling this nonsense really undermines the Cooper case in the minds of the public..
-
It can be rejected, but the only way to positively ID is if the canopy has the S/N 60-9707 Gryder's claim that the chute container was Cossey's and Cooper's is a mess.. I am beginning to believe he is scamming.. The chute container Gryder found has D-rings.. Hayden's did not. Cossey was mistaken, his personal custom chute wasn't used. You don't supply one custom chute and regular chute as a set of bailout rigs... Further, Cossey's pull customization claim was not moving handle left to right. It was out and up. Cossey claimed the chute was sage green nylon container/sage green nylon straps.. Cossey also claimed his chute did not have D-rings.. Those stitches look new.. So, the chute container Gryder claims he found doesn't match Hayden's container and it doesn't match Cossey's false claim. This is the container Gryder claims he found... it has D rings..
-
McCoy demanded fuel truck 100 ft from the nose, left side 2 drivers. Cooper demands 10 or 11 o'clock.. 1 driver.. The chute Gryder claims he found looks like it has D rings.. BUSTED
-
Gryder... part 2 Claims he found Cooper's NB8.. He didn't. Cossey never claimed his mod was moving the ripcord left to right and Cossey got the chute wrong.. spends half the vid on the killing of McCoy No, McCoy was NOT Cooper
-
You SAID Reca/Peca colluded with Cossey, where is your proof.. When did Reca/Peca live in Wa.. apparently he fled Mi after a 1965 robbery leaving his family.
-
They saw 305 on radar..
-
A pair of F106's and a pair of F102's..
-
He wasn't their spokesman.
-
The 50 years of failure line is irrelevant.. and IMO false.. The tapes are not evidence of anything... What evidence do you have other than the tapes that Reca/Peca even knew of Cossey in 1971 or knew him personally?
-
Hold on.. back up, Reca/Peca's tapes are full of bad case information, It is clear that Carl Laurin researched the case, coached and led Reca/Peca with his poor research. Carl and Reca/Peca got so much wrong that the entire narrative is ridiculous... everything said in those tapes is completely unreliable. To show that Reca/Peca knew Cossey it has to be corroborated beyond those tapes.. but a complete waste of time since Reca/Peca is not Cooper and the worst higher profile suspect ever presented.
-
Gregory,, one quarter Indian or Mexican blood.
-
64 jumps in 1958? Do they count military jumps?
-
Unfortunately the checks are on negative side of the ledger,,, Did you mark down the ability to drift 100 miles under canopy in a strong wind...
-
He meant either,, not one specifically.
-
Gregory said 1/4 Mexican or possibly Native American blood.. that is virtually the same as Latin (Latino)
-
Not exactly, it was also the hair and the complexion.. overall appearance.
-
False dichotomy, NickyB.. Bill said "he does kind of look like him.." the sketch. He is correct. He is one of the few that didn't notice a dark olive complexion.. an outlier,, why is that? Did he only see a profile? Did he not really pay close attention to Cooper because he didn't know a hijacking was going on and he moved seats.. odd, don't you think.. Bill didn't see the dark complexion but now you rely on him.. to ID a guy you claim had a dark Norwegian complexion. He also said he couldn't ID Cooper any longer... You seem to miss that part Nicky.. selective memory. Bill was being polite, he is a nice guy and Vordahl does kind of resemble sketch, Gregory knew something was up with Cooper when he got up to leave he took a good look at him.. and Gregory's description was corroborated by others. and Bill was the one who mentioned the turkey neck, that is something you would see in the profile..
-
Sure, you have many boxes to check.. resembling the sketch is the basics.. it is a process and with such a passage of time you just can't get all the info needed for each suspect.. Where was X on November 24 1971.. I have put together a 100 point list for Cooper's profile.. some are facts, witness testimony but most are inferences made by the FBI.. it surprised me how few 100% facts we actually have.. that gives suspects lots of plausible wiggle room,, he had a tan or he was a dark Norwegian.. This 100 point list really sorts out the weak... each point can be a match, a negation or an unknown.. a match or a negation can be qualified from weak to strong.. but at the end you still a get a circumstantial analysis or a map. Very strong to very weak. When Cooper is revealed everything will fit in place and it will be obvious, not a bending, twisting or contorting of evidence to make him fit. I think new DNA will be the only way to put somebody in the end zone, and that may not even be possible any longer with the FBI and contamination.. we may only have a strong circumstantial case at best...
-
Titanium-Antimony and salt was used as a flameproofing for textiles starting in the 50's... That is why I sent a 1964 era Penny's tie to Tom for testing.. some of the particle may be inherent to the production/dying/flame proofing of Dacron Polyester.
-
The other problem is using sketches and pics.. a single image can be misleading more images with ancestral facts to corroborate are better.. I have a dozen images of a suspect and he looks like 3 completely different people..
-
Apparently Russian.. but we can't trust any info about Reca, the narrative is a fraud..