FLYJACK

No it isn't, Cooper could have been describing the characteristics of the people or the geography. You and Georger failed with your post NORJAK "nice" claim, but it doesn't matter you ignore your error and just carry on.. amateur. You think it is goofy and belittle it because you despise anything I suggest. You don't know what he meant, neither do I.. only Cooper knows.

His biggest flaw is that he isn't Cooper.

Like clockwork... straw-man. I am not flogging Hahneman, the only time I mention him is when you spread misinformation.. The fact is Skip Hall has unique features that are obvious and no witness mentioned. He is NOT Cooper. Anybody who ignores that Skip Hall silver bullet is either lying or delusional.

Clearly NOT Cooper's face/forehead.. lumps bumps and severe creases that witnesses would not have missed. Waste your time on Skip boys and girls, you will never get it back...

Is Skip Hall still being flogged as a suspect? He has many bumps on his face and severe forehead lines that are so unique and obvious no witness would would miss it... the silver bullet. Skip is eliminated. Anybody defending him is delusional. Skip is the NEO Duane Weber.. and the Vortex continues to slide into the abyss. The case is going backwards.. and has become a cult.

Georger, you are just wrong.. "Minnesota Nice" is an informal term, the "nice" behaviour predates NORJAK, that is just a fact. You guys don't understand that people of that area were described as "nice" well before NORJAK. Cooper may have been describing the people not the geography. That is a legitimate theory.

No, that explains the racist angle, there are lots of other sources. "Minnesota Nice" is just the informal term for the behaviour, the term was promoted by the State after NORJAK but the behaviour predated it. People just call them "nice" and that behaviour goes way back to the 1930's and Scandinavian immigrants.. You guys are focused on the term not the descriptive behaviour which is what Cooper might have been acknowledging.. Cooper could have been referring to their "nice" behaviour which predates NORJAK.. So yes, you guys are wrong.. and amateurs.. https://www.mayoclinichealthsystem.org/hometown-health/speaking-of-health/kindness-behind-midwest-nice#:~:text=It's thought that Minnesota Nice,friendships once they open up. https://theconversation.com/the-contradictions-of-minnesota-nice-236751 https://www.mprnews.org/story/2009/12/14/syljones Your apology should be forthcoming.. and add all the other lies and errors in there as well..

You are WRONG,, and so is Olemiss for liking it.. of course, he has his own problem with misinformation.. and cheers anything that challenges me even when it is false.. DO YOUR HOMEWORK KIDS... Confirmation Bias can bite you... What a bunch of amateurs.... the term was later revised to strip out the racial aspect. That is what your quoted passage is referring to. The revised version. https://www.twincities.com/2017/06/29/letter-revisiting-minnesota-nice/ "While it’s somehow been co-opted to trumpet the goodness of our people, the term was never meant as a compliment. “Minnesota Nice” was coined in the 1960s to describe the kind of racism practiced in Northern states. The term denotes an attitude that says, “Welcome to the neighborhood, but I already have all the friends I need.” It’s an attitude that settles for tolerance — similar to that afforded mosquitoes in the summer — rather than acceptance and inclusion. It’s an agreement to a parallel, rather than an integrated, co-existence." and stop wasting my time with your misinformation... It is clear none of you guys understand the subject and nobody except Cooper actually knows what he meant. So, you have no argument.

For Federal BOP.. 0 "Dan Cooper" since 1982 7 "Daniel Cooper" since 1982 Only 1 "Daniel Cooper" currently incarcerated out of 144,000 males. The name is not as common as it would seem.

Well, Captain obvious strikes again.. how do you do it. I have always said we don't know what he meant, you and others have claimed to know what he meant. Not me. "Minnesota nice" is the concept, the people would be described as "nice". Nobody would use the phrase "Minnesota nice". They would just call them "nice".. If Tina was accurate and Cooper did say "Minnesota is nice country" that could mean geographically or the characteristics of the people. and again, we don't know what Cooper actually meant. But, using "nice" to describe the people was far more common then than calling the geography "nice". And, through the 60's "Minnesota nice" had a racial reference.

Currently.. For reference, the data I posted was WW2 enlistment,,, Cooper's age and likely environment. It was a somewhat rare name then only 40.. Dan/Daniel Cooper together.. I have checked old phone directories as well, not common. So, no the facts don't fit your assertion.. at least for WW2 enlistment at only 40 that is rare.. less than expected. You seem to be conflating the first and last names as separate..

Oh brother,, You don't know what Cooper said or meant.

It wasn't a common description...

No, it isn't that simple and you are falsely claiming that I know what he meant, then using that as a straw-man. I never claimed that I know what he meant. I said we don't know. You claim to know what he meant but you don't really. He could have been referring the geography or the characteristics of the people.. Was Minnesota known as a nice "geography",, not that I know of. Was Minnesota known as having people described as nice,,, absolutely. I am just pointing out that through the 60's Minnesota "nice" was a popular description of the people and it was a racist thing, later the racist thing was erased. If Cooper was referring to the people of Minnesota rather than the geography then that would be what they call in the sleuthing business as a "clue".

That is an assumption.... we don't know what he meant.

"very nice country" came from Tina's interview so we don't even know if those were Cooper's exact words.. We will never know what Cooper really meant... I don't know of Minnesota being particular "nice" country, geographically. After searching I haven't found it described as "nice country".. but I donl't know that area. The phrase "Minnesota nice" was common to describe the behavioural characteristics of the people. It is interesting that "Minnesota nice" in the 1960's was a racist thing... People would be nice and polite but covertly racist... masking their racism.. Later, well after NORJAK the State used the term Minnesota Nice to promote it and redefined it without the racism... So, the term was redefined to just mean the politeness of the people. Maybe it was a throw away line from Cooper, or maybe he was referring to the common racist term at the time "Minnesota Nice".. we will never know.

Maybe, maybe not....

"very nice country" In the 60's "Minnesota nice" was a subtle form of racism...

I believe Weinberg took the name from a US test pilot George Cooper.

Dan(iel) Cooper is actually a rare name.. It is extremely unlikely it was his real name.. So, he either made it up completely combined it, added the two names together from experience he took the full name from his prior experience In the ADD archive WW2 enlistment there are only 7 Dan Cooper's and 33 Daniel Cooper's.. 40 total That is not very many... 16.4 million served in WW2,, not sure how complete the AAD database is.. but 40 seems really low.

He is a really interesting guy.. he did live in the area previously and had many arrests in the PNW years before. What a long rap sheet... So, he had a prior connection to the area. The bill numbers aren't that significant,, I have found $20 bills one number off. You have 9998 random bill numbers that can be close.

Johnston was arrested 2:25 AM of the 24th not PM in the afternoon...

I didn't see psychic on your resume.. I have images of Hahneman that look look completely different. He looks like like three completely different people in those images. Even several witnesses in Hahneman's hijacking were shown his actual image and said no not him..

You conflate two different arguments.. sketch B is the best likeness when witnesses were shown A they didn't have B.. Tina said she never saw Cooper's face, you know that but still use her claim. Flo was kooky,, she later said none of the sketches was right. Bill was critical... Gregory was also critical,, None of those comments make A better then B,, witnesses are commenting on a sketch they believe everyone else liked.. They were not comparing A to B..

I have every right, what right do you have to challenge my rights... Sketch B was created using a more comprehensive process. B was not created because of the attribution error of Flo's statement. The FBI stated B was the best likeness... B closely matches Murphy. A was created very fast.... When they liked parts of A they did not have B... Witnesses were aware of A and they created and chose B. Case closed. There is no evidence A is better. none. You don't even have a reasonable argument. I forgot.... that undisclosed image of Cooper I obtained supports B not A... the evidence for B is just overwhelming.