FLYJACK

I never expect you to but you said you would admit you were wrong if Minnesota "nice" existed before NORJAK.. It did, you lied again and your word is mud.

So Hall is now a suspect, I thought he was POI or is that just politically correct nonsense. It is really difficult to actually eliminate a suspect with facts... most people use opinion. Ironically, the less you know the harder it can be.. but Hall can be eliminated with those many bumps dimpled chin and severe forehead and eye wrinkles. Fortunately we have that for Hall, but without that it comes down to an opinion.. Lots of suspects can't be eliminated but are not Cooper. If we ignore the facial features that eliminate him,, IMO he still was not Cooper.. There is no real evidence for him and he was known to the CIA and FBI pre Norjak,, He was high profile in the Intel community and had many shady ways to make money... He doesn't fit Cooper's profile. Cooper was a nobody, a loner. Those obvious facial features eliminate him,, anyone who isn't biased can see it.

Now you change the goalpost to avoid responsibility. The verbiage is not the issue, the fact that the people from Minnesota were well known as "nice" before NORJAK is.. and you were wrong. TIP.. never trust Georger's quick google search. You can't prove Cooper meant "nice" geography... maybe he did, we don't know.

Again strawmanning.. Hahneman has nothing to with Skip Hall's facial bumps and severe wrinkles.. They exist. Deal with it.

Wholly dishonest Ryan. That is a crap photo.

Of course you don't actually grasp the issue.. and are gaslighting. You don't know what Cooper meant. I have always said he could have been describing the geography or the characteristics of the people.. You still haven't admitted you were wrong..

Not a minor physical detail... grow up. Those bumps on his face and severe wrinkles are unique enough that they would not be missed by witnesses.

Sure, Limbach is playing semantics.. everyone who investigates a suspect gets attacked for being biased.. to mitigate that just change the language and pretend otherwise. Calling a suspect a POI is defence to being accused of bias.. Of course it isn't, it is a cheap parlour trick.. of course Limbach is pushing Cooper as a suspect.. Like Ryan claiming he isn't biased because he doesn't have a suspect, it is nonsense. and I agree, nothing wrong with having a suspect... how else do you vet people and move the case.. but having a suspect is treated with hate and disdain.. pretty stupid. The problem is that obviously Hall was not Cooper based on the facts and nobody has the integrity to say so.

I noticed Skip's hair is so thin that he had to part it on both sides... In the pic on the right there are even more bumps visible on this face and a dimpled chin. AND THAT FOREHEAD... THOSE WRINKLES.... get real people.

HAHAHAHA... That's what happens when you advocate a bad position rather than pursue the truth... and I don't think Skip's nose is an issue..

The parachute colour came from Cossey.. Ryan's go to for reliable info. Cossey also claimed the NB6 and NB8 which conflict with the evidence, he also lied about the chutes. So, what colour were they,, probably white, but not necessarily. Cossey and Emrich both acknowledged the X on the dummy. Since Cossey made the dummy if only he had mentioned the X that would be suss,, but it was also from Emrich.. But Cossey has become his own Rorschach.. people just take from him what fits their preconception.. He is factual here but lying there.... Anything from Cossey is unreliable without corroboration.

Of course it is a straw-man, that is your go to when you have no argument. Instead of admitting the facts you use a distraction. Look a squirrel... You can't help yourself, you have gotten away with it for so long it is in your nature. You just won't acknowledge the facts about Skip Hall's dramatic facial features that eliminate him. They are still there whether I point them out or not or whether Hahneman ever existed... Yes, you are straw-manning because most low information people fall for it and you can manipulate opinions.. but it is dishonest.

No it isn't, Cooper could have been describing the characteristics of the people or the geography. You and Georger failed with your post NORJAK "nice" claim, but it doesn't matter you ignore your error and just carry on.. amateur. You think it is goofy and belittle it because you despise anything I suggest. You don't know what he meant, neither do I.. only Cooper knows.

His biggest flaw is that he isn't Cooper.

Like clockwork... straw-man. I am not flogging Hahneman, the only time I mention him is when you spread misinformation.. The fact is Skip Hall has unique features that are obvious and no witness mentioned. He is NOT Cooper. Anybody who ignores that Skip Hall silver bullet is either lying or delusional.

Clearly NOT Cooper's face/forehead.. lumps bumps and severe creases that witnesses would not have missed. Waste your time on Skip boys and girls, you will never get it back...

Is Skip Hall still being flogged as a suspect? He has many bumps on his face and severe forehead lines that are so unique and obvious no witness would would miss it... the silver bullet. Skip is eliminated. Anybody defending him is delusional. Skip is the NEO Duane Weber.. and the Vortex continues to slide into the abyss. The case is going backwards.. and has become a cult.

Georger, you are just wrong.. "Minnesota Nice" is an informal term, the "nice" behaviour predates NORJAK, that is just a fact. You guys don't understand that people of that area were described as "nice" well before NORJAK. Cooper may have been describing the people not the geography. That is a legitimate theory.

No, that explains the racist angle, there are lots of other sources. "Minnesota Nice" is just the informal term for the behaviour, the term was promoted by the State after NORJAK but the behaviour predated it. People just call them "nice" and that behaviour goes way back to the 1930's and Scandinavian immigrants.. You guys are focused on the term not the descriptive behaviour which is what Cooper might have been acknowledging.. Cooper could have been referring to their "nice" behaviour which predates NORJAK.. So yes, you guys are wrong.. and amateurs.. https://www.mayoclinichealthsystem.org/hometown-health/speaking-of-health/kindness-behind-midwest-nice#:~:text=It's thought that Minnesota Nice,friendships once they open up. https://theconversation.com/the-contradictions-of-minnesota-nice-236751 https://www.mprnews.org/story/2009/12/14/syljones Your apology should be forthcoming.. and add all the other lies and errors in there as well..

You are WRONG,, and so is Olemiss for liking it.. of course, he has his own problem with misinformation.. and cheers anything that challenges me even when it is false.. DO YOUR HOMEWORK KIDS... Confirmation Bias can bite you... What a bunch of amateurs.... the term was later revised to strip out the racial aspect. That is what your quoted passage is referring to. The revised version. https://www.twincities.com/2017/06/29/letter-revisiting-minnesota-nice/ "While it’s somehow been co-opted to trumpet the goodness of our people, the term was never meant as a compliment. “Minnesota Nice” was coined in the 1960s to describe the kind of racism practiced in Northern states. The term denotes an attitude that says, “Welcome to the neighborhood, but I already have all the friends I need.” It’s an attitude that settles for tolerance — similar to that afforded mosquitoes in the summer — rather than acceptance and inclusion. It’s an agreement to a parallel, rather than an integrated, co-existence." and stop wasting my time with your misinformation... It is clear none of you guys understand the subject and nobody except Cooper actually knows what he meant. So, you have no argument.

For Federal BOP.. 0 "Dan Cooper" since 1982 7 "Daniel Cooper" since 1982 Only 1 "Daniel Cooper" currently incarcerated out of 144,000 males. The name is not as common as it would seem.

Well, Captain obvious strikes again.. how do you do it. I have always said we don't know what he meant, you and others have claimed to know what he meant. Not me. "Minnesota nice" is the concept, the people would be described as "nice". Nobody would use the phrase "Minnesota nice". They would just call them "nice".. If Tina was accurate and Cooper did say "Minnesota is nice country" that could mean geographically or the characteristics of the people. and again, we don't know what Cooper actually meant. But, using "nice" to describe the people was far more common then than calling the geography "nice". And, through the 60's "Minnesota nice" had a racial reference.

Currently.. For reference, the data I posted was WW2 enlistment,,, Cooper's age and likely environment. It was a somewhat rare name then only 40.. Dan/Daniel Cooper together.. I have checked old phone directories as well, not common. So, no the facts don't fit your assertion.. at least for WW2 enlistment at only 40 that is rare.. less than expected. You seem to be conflating the first and last names as separate..

Oh brother,, You don't know what Cooper said or meant.

It wasn't a common description...