FLYJACK

You still lied,, 3rd time for the same issue.. you are a misinformation machine. You said he was missing half his upper teeth.. false You said he was missing upper and lower teeth... false Now, you say he was missing only his upper teeth and that is just as bad.. false/misleading I had that FBI document many years ago but I also had a pic of him showing his upper teeth with none missing... so, it took me 6 years to reconcile it. You jumped on it to falsely eliminate and trash Hahneman and me by proxy but it wasn't what you thought.. Your bias was front running the facts. The FBI file said missing several upper side teeth... turns out it was the bicuspids which are commonly removed for braces and crooked teeth.. they are down the side in front of the molars.. only one witness noticed it and knew teeth well... they also commented on his odd lip... When the bicuspid is removed the teeth move back to fill the space and the lower lip often protrudes slightly.. So, those missing bicuspids are not noticeable unless you know teeth well. One person noticed it out of maybe 50.. So, Ryan with full arrogance is still spreading misinformation... he claims he wants to get things right,, clearly false. Mocking Hahneman from a position of ignorance shows how inept he is... and I never said Cossey made it up. You, as usual misrepresent my position.. His initial description of the chutes was an assumption, an error, he legit believed his back chutes were taken from Issaquah.. When he realized his error he never corrected it. Appreciate a correction on that as well as the teeth.. if you want to get things right.

Speaking of the moon.. Here is a matching tie and clip from a NASA launch.. The guy is a swarthy IBM contractor, I found his name but don't need to say because he isn't Cooper and he doesn't have the Michael Jackson nose.

What can she add to anything Cooper.. Ryan would be weaponizing his channel for a personal attack... nothing to do with the case. He keeps flogging sketch A and the Michael Jackson nose.. look at Murphy, many witnesses said the best of hundreds they've seen in glasses and hat, NO SMALL NOSE. He just ignores evidence contrary to his opinions... Murphy, Skip's unique facial features, Cossey's descriptive serial lying, Gunther's book all made up, Vordahl nonsense.... he even lied about Hahneman's teeth but never admitted or corrected it. Once these wrong things get traction it is nearly impossible to pull them back. And the crowd cries out for more... Rose did the Hahneman sketch and guess what, the nose is way too small.. YES, Ryan's hero, the best sketch artist who ever lived got it wrong... A Rose is a Rose but a Nose is NOT a Nose when it is too small... What was it, a Chinese Buffet... Pick and Chews your confirmation bias.. Maybe, we need to do some debunking videos.. The Vortex is going backward's with these bad suspect's, manipulated evidence and poorly reasoned theories.

The tie examined by the FBI was very dirty, it had lots of dust in the knot area, that indicates it wasn't worn for a while, it had a pin hole in it and we know it was covered in those unique particles. It was $1.50 new and generally a work tie. Cooper was careful to take items with him but left the tie,, that suggests he discarded it. The tie had a pin hole, since a pin and a clip are not worn together that indicates it was worn with a pin.. possibly a company pin. The cheap alligator clip may have been added just before the hijacking. Like the TBAR money, it will never be solved 100%.. best we will get is theories. My theory based on known evidence and some undisclosed evidence is that Cooper obtained the tie just before the hijacking and discarded it having no connection to it. The tie particles may have nothing to do with Cooper. There is no evidence to indicate Cooper was the person who wore the tie from circa 1964/65 when the particles were deposited to NORJAK.

No.

Not new, it was circa 1964/65... it was very cheap new, very dirty and had a hole in it.. Cooper discarded it,, while taking the other items. I have a theory about where it came from.

Yup, interesting guy,, don't see anything that indicates Cooper..

This guy.. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Magee_(fighter_pilot) Problem is,, you can find lots of guys that tick many or most boxes and fit the basic profile, probably tens of thousands out there.. but they all eventually hit a wall and can't be connected to the hijacking. Researching a guy in November 1971 can be really tough...

Sure, anything is possible,, but that would be the exception. Most military guys were young and not successful yet... Point is Cooper was not a successful person, he didn't have 80+ patents, was not an astronaut surgeon, a murderer, linked to the Kennedy assassination or a scientist, he was a chronic underachiever, an unmemorable nobody, probably a narcissist who had the guts to prove he could finally do something others hadn't. Cooper researchers are attracted to high profile people because they have lots of info readily available.. sort of a survivorship bias.

Hair slide,, gone. DNA,, dead end. Tie particles,, IMO, most likely, Cooper obtained the tie right before the hijacking and discarded it. My optimism is based on the information I have and case evidence I am still trying to get.. most is not public. It is getting really close..

I am 90% confident this case will be 100% solved, and 100% confident it will be 90% solved.

Not that I recall.. There was that Coffelt propaganda article claiming Flo,,, mentioned "sad". That article is riddled with errors.

Ryan's book isn't available yet..

Everyone approaches the Cooper case as a normal crime... as the only unsolved hijacking it is extraordinary and something extraordinary happened for it to remain unsolved for so long.. for example Cooper died in the jump... I think that is extremely unlikely but something unique happened, an error, a mistake, luck or something significant occurred for this case to remain unsolved by the FBI. Distributing sketch A as Cooper perhaps.. something big undermined this case. Trying to solve this as a regular crime won't cut it. That didn't work for the FBI and it won't work now. In 1976 the FBI concluded that there is no prosecution without Cooper's cooperation due to weak evidence and faded witnesses.. Cooper is dead by now, evidence isn't much better, DNA is a dead end, fingerprints were unlikely Cooper's and obfuscated. The palm print is possibly Cooper's. So, how is this thing ever solved 100%...

That would eliminate all those high profile so called "suspects"... Cooper did not look like the BING sketch. I have been trying to figure out or establish Cooper's head shape... some witnesses said oval... The sketch looks oval,, but everyone has a triangular shape.. you can claim triangular but is there a standard criteria for head shape? So, I looked for some "official" or consensus on head shape. There doesn't seem to be. It is too subjective to be of value,, unless the head shape is dramatically obvious. I found a measurement system and it was inconclusive for sketch B. Then tried AI online evaluations.. mixed... and unreliable. Conclusion,, Face shape is mixed and not reliable enough... very subjective and AI sucks.

Ryan hinted at a new suspect,,, is it Frank Lawrence Sprenz perhaps. Interesting guy.. not Cooper, too high profile a criminal wore a toupee, was previously on FBI top 10, had a 1" scar on face and crooked finger, was paroled in 1971 but returned to crime. Implicated in death's sent back to prison, actually died in custody,, but never mentioned Cooper. Does not fit Cooper's profile. Another guy with a very high profile interesting background that gets flogged as Cooper... Cooper was a forgettable nobody.... not a master criminal on the FBI 10 most wanted, not implicated in the Kennedy assassination or murdering his family.... not a super badass paratrooper, not a Physician Astronaut, not a PHD metallurgist working on the Manhattan Project. Picking these guys with interesting stories makes for good hype and discussion but they are not Cooper. Cooper was a lifelong loser, loner and underachiever, he did this for the money and to prove he could do something others had not...

In Ryan's newest vid he is still flogging the bogus flightpath map using Cunningham's false times.. Do not ACCEPT those altered times. Challenge these guys, don't let them spread false information. This nonsense undermines the case. Sunk cost fallacy... He is still pushing the wrong jumpzone... Cooper jumped about 8:11. There is ZERO evidence for Orchards/Battleground. It is a baseless opinion. Ryan is minimizing Skip Hall's extreme wrinkles.. says "we are looking for forehead wrinkles", as if Skip's are a plus. NO, Ryan is being deceptive, Skip has extreme forehead wrinkles and severe wrinkles from around his eyes down his face.. not normal or average wrinkles Cooper had. Skip also has several noticeable lumps/bumps on his face.. These are so unique and obvious he is eliminated because no witness mentioned them.. Skip is eliminated and not a legit suspect. "Plausible" suspect's.. NOPE. Plausible definition - seeming likely to be true, or able to be believed: Most of those suspect's Ryan named are not plausible. There was only one Cooper so logically most are not plausible. Ryan is positioning suspect's to fit the term "plausible", they are not. Letters.... I believe two letters were from Cooper, one more highly likely and another maybe... Very hard to prove though. Parachutes... Cooper used the 1960 24' and left the 1957 26', took the newer. Parachutes of different sizes can be made to have the same descent rate, not that Cooper would necessarily know that. Cossey actually claimed the 26 and 28ft chutes had the same descent rate, but he was mistaken/lying about the chutes.. there is no credible evidence that the container Cooper used was an NB6 or NB8 per Cossey. The tie... I now believe, based on my own evidence that Cooper left the tie behind because it was obtained just prior to and only used for the hijacking.. he did not leave it by accident and it wasn't from a thrift shop.

Not sure what Ryan is thinking,, Yes, there is a profile in part #95, starts on page 247 and outlines "INVESTIGATIVE STEPS TO PROCESS NORJAK SUSPECTS" The PROFILE starts with this disclaimer then outlines it.. Elimination isn't final,, I remember reading of a suspect who was eliminated but later re-evaluated as a suspect. Bottom line, an eliminated suspect not based on facts isn't really eliminated.

Feet first..

Newspaper dated.. April 1972. Obviously those props are fake,,

sure, he is part of the community... we don't all agree on things but he should know the forum is active again

Yup, money wasn't human buried but we will never know how it got there outside of a few plausible theories... Based on the evidence this is what I believe so far.. Money came from River. Money landed as one rubber banded bundle of three packets. Money went into the River in Spring/Summer. Money was in same condition/order as when given to Cooper. Money rounded off due to tumbling along sandy bottom. Money tumbled along bottom during a high water event to end up at the high water mark. Have 3 theories for how the money got into the River.. no way to prove anything. Considering a new possible theory that the 1974 dredge layer was on top of money and eroded away by 1980. The dredge layer Palmer identified as 1974 was actually a pre Norjak 1970 layer... The money was on top of the 1970 layer but under the 1974 layer until 1980 when it became exposed. So, Palmer assumed the money arrived after 1974 because it was above the dredge layer. It makes more sense if that was actually the 1970 layer.

For those that don't have it.. Sluggo's page in the archives. https://web.archive.org/web/20190210220215/http://n467us.com/

I agree and I don't have an issue wth new theories even if wrong.. they need vetting. That is how the case moves forward.. The problem is when these things get spread, promoted and used as fact... unchallenged. The PHD people created a presentation for CooperCon using false/altered path times now that presentation becomes fact to many people,, once bad info gets accepted in the Cooper domain it is hard to unwind it from the narrative.

The path is ok, the revised times are wrong.. We lost R99 with the forum change, maybe somebody can contact him?? Georger gets really grumpy when people change the evidence but he has a secret thing with Cunningham. I like Marty, but he went off the reservation with the Clara/Dayton stuff.. Where are the critical thinkers... nothing worse than (falsely) altering case evidence and pushing it as new info.