tonyhays

Members
  • Content

    1,055
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3
  • Feedback

    0%

Everything posted by tonyhays

  1. Yet another point that Trump will be able to use in his favour. “That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
  2. John Oliver weighs in on the issue. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OIQbDPNLpkI “That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
  3. http://www.addictinginfo.org/2015/12/08/ted-cruz-screw-the-supreme-court-ill-outlaw-abortion-anyway-video/ Disclaimer...this is a heavily biased article, but it has a link to the video of Cruz saying they don't have to wait for Roe V. Wade to be overturned. Thus bypassing the SC. “That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
  4. What part of giving personhood status to fetus's and zygotes thus bypassing the supreme court "upholding the U.S. Constitution"? “That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
  5. And....the Republican war on women continues. http://www.iflscience.com/health-and-medicine/defunding-planned-parenthood-leads-increase-low-income-births-texas “That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
  6. ODS is about as consistent as God of the Gaps on the ICR Facebook page. “That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
  7. *yawn* So another set of videos are released shortly after the state of Texas clears PP of any wrongdoing yet indicts the makers of the original videos. Anything to keep the republican base riled up and take the attention off of the clowns running for the republican nomination. “That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
  8. Meh. The ramblings of an idiot teenager are completely irrelevant to his current idiotic ideas and statements. A "national prayer team"? Personhood for zygotes? Bomb until sand glows in the dark? The douchebaggery is strong with this one. He doesn't stand a chance. “That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
  9. I'd say the attached pic is a good representation of who is supporting Trump. “That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
  10. I have not. I've done a couple cursory google searches on who she supports and was guessing she will eventually be in his camp. I hope she does it sooner rather than later. “That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
  11. Imagine a Sanders/Warren ticket. “That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
  12. Wrong about the AU buy back program in what way? “That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
  13. Combined with the other stats I provided? Absolutely. “That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
  14. How it went down? Homicides down both in number and per capita. Robberies down per capita. Firearms used in homicides/robberies down. Zero mass shootings since. http://www.aic.gov.au/dataTools/facts/vicViolentCol.html And my personal favourite...destroying the argument that gun control only takes away guns from the law abiding..... http://www.ibtimes.com.au/cost-illegal-firearms-australia-has-skyrocketed-criminals-now-do-gun-sharing-1378871 But I seriously doubt that will ever work in the U.S. “That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
  15. “If someone doesn't value evidence, what evidence are you going to provide to prove that they should value it? If someone doesn’t value logic, what logical argument could you provide to show the importance of logic?” -- Sam Harris. Definitely applicable. “That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
  16. Probably got her accreditation at the Institute for Creation Research. “That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
  17. 'Cause 'Murica!!!! Doesn't matter cause it potentially destroys the pro-gun lobby's ideas that gun control only affects the law-abiding citizen? Please provide such links, i'd love to see them. Another stat: zero mass shootings in Australia since the gun buyback. “That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
  18. That right there is laughable. Guns are indeed a CONTRIBUTING factor in mass shootings. As far as gun laws, the gun buyback in Australia seems to be working quite well. Total number of homicides down in both number and per capita. Guns used in robberies down per capita. Cost of guns on the black market have skyrocketed, putting them out of reach for many criminals. http://www.ibtimes.com.au/cost-illegal-firearms-australia-has-skyrocketed-criminals-now-do-gun-sharing-1378871 http://www.aic.gov.au/statistics/homicide/weapon.html “That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
  19. And that's yet another reason why religion has no claim on morality. To be an absolute cunt(like Ted Bundy) all your life and at the 11th hour repent and be granted eternal bliss. That's about as immoral as it gets. “That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
  20. Not always true..... http://www.ibtimes.com.au/cost-illegal-firearms-australia-has-skyrocketed-criminals-now-do-gun-sharing-1378871 Of course, geographic isolation helps. “That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
  21. Your thoughts on this? https://thechurchoftruth.wordpress.com/synoptic-gospels-not-writen-by-matt-mark-luke-or-john/ “That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
  22. Gil Fulbright has my vote https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NAtunJv6NtE “That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
  23. http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2015/11/18/anti-choice-laws-spurring-spike-in-dangerous-self-induced-abortions/ From the article..."When all was said and done, 1.7% of the respondents directly admitted to having attempted a self-induced abortion." So as predicted the more restrictive you make it the more likely it is to resort to the "back-alley" days. But now you don't need the proverbial coat-hanger, you can just order the abortion pills online. How is this "helping women's health", the mantra the right likes to chant when they pass these restrictions? Oh that's right, it has nothing to do with women's health. They just don't have the balls to come right out and say it. One thing about the study I didn't like was their methodology. Asking if they suspected someone they know tried to self-induce doesn't seem all that scientific to me. “That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
  24. I love it when theists mention this. Nobody was killed in the name of atheism, they were in the name of a political ideology. Trying to link it to atheism is pathetic. “That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
  25. Sorry, it took 12 posts before the ODS set in. My mistake. “That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”