promise5

Bread No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

Chowder No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

I would really like to know how many guys that peed in public are on that list. That seems to be the go to scenario. Well, if a guy peed in public and went through the process and got convicted and ended up on the registry then I feel bad for him. Hopefully he would be able to get his name removed after a year or two.But I still will advocate for those listed on that registry to not be allowed to be instructors. No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

Lugarville No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

Smith and Wesson No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

Cannonball No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

Mini van Never!! No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

Stingy No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

dinky No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

I want a hippopotamus for Christmas !!!! No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

Oh no!!! I never want to hear from people that agree with me. The only thing I ask is even if we don't again we don't mock each other. I don't think I am in my post. No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

I have found it interesting that there seems to be so much concern for the perpetrators of these types of crimes. I've really never come across this as much as I have since discussing this topic. Maybe it's the way I grew up. When did we reach the point that we are so concerned about the people that commit such crimes instead of the victims of the crimes. It was THEIR CHOICE and THEIR BAD DECISION that got them on that list to begin with. Maybe they have changed,maybe they will never commit such an act again,maybe it was 15-20 years ago an they've got a perfect record since. Ok fine good for them they've turned their life around. Great. I give them credit for it. But, I'm sorry the victim didn't have a choice in the matter and it can and does effect the rest of their lives. Yes,through good maybe even great counseling and therapy which is also EXPENSIVE they move on and live amazing lives. There still is the potential for triggers for them, for times of regression in the healing. Yet, we are more concerned with the perpetrators and them not having something held against them for the rest of their lives or have it effect the rest of their lives. Wow and wow! Oh did we even mention the families of these victims? The boyfriends, the husbands, the parents or even the children that are also affected ? The counseling that they might need. But hey the guy did his time and he's moved on and we shouldn't "punish him" for a bad choice he made or a series of bad choices. Again, WOW!!! As I said I believe he has the right to enjoy this sport. Skydive as much as he wants. But WHY does he have to be a TI or any type of instructor? It was his choices that got him on the registry to begin with. So accept he should accept that he will have limitations to things he can do and not being able to be an instructor is one of them. No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

This was sent to me, so I thought I would post it myself This is legally tricky. First, given the legal climate in the U.S., it is highly unlikely that clients will be minors. They will all be 18+ as few DZs allow minors to tandem, as a minor cannot sign a legally binding contract. The part where the DZO has a good reason to get reason to get the heebies over employing this person is, thanks to Agency, the DZO is liable for the actions of their employees. Do you want a convicted sex offender strapping their body against clients? The most harmless playful tickle of that sorority girl as "Geronimo!" Is yelled, leaning out the door - well, maybe she laughs and thinks it was harmless fun. Maybe she gets angry and complains to the DZO. Maybe she has issues or was assssulted in the past, and she sues the drop zone, or files assault charges against that guy. His past will come out, and it will go horribly for the DZ. Sorry, that offender is a liability time bomb. The only way I would employee them is if I had a personal relationship (Eg brother in law) and had a high trust factor. And then I still wouldn't put them in physical contact scenarios. Teach the AFF ground school. Fly camera as videographer. Pack. Work manifest. Be involved in a way that you don't physically interact with clients - ever. And again ONLY with high trust level. NEVER LEFT ALONE WITH CLIENTS. NEVER. Agency law , folks, is why corp America drug tests, credit checks and breathes down the neck of employees. Liability. No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

Fox No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

Food No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

Funnel cakes!!! No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

Tea party No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

Terrorized But hey they survived didn't they. :-) No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

Brother No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

Match didn't lose the suit, they settled fairly quickly. It announced shortly after the filing of the suit that it would start screening, and a few months later the plaintiff of the would be class action suit agreed to the policy changes offered by Match and ended the suit. I think there was another site that was also sued. No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

SING!!!!!!! No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

Right one :-) No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

Coffee No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

So its required? Then they basically lie about it and that's that. But I'll say it even though I got a TON of crap for my thoughts. I still don't think they should be certified and would advocate for them not to be. (I'm prepared to be given even more crap about it now) But thanks for everyone that's answered and been respectful.

Well then either it doesn't matter or they lie and don't check the box. so that's kinda useless No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.