All Activity
This stream auto-updates
- Today
-
See, you just can't resist.
-
Install a sign telling people what to do and when to do it! Scared? I think you mean Afraid. The lexicon seems to always be bigger than you know! Go back to school Jackass.
-
That has been obvious for years... but you do seem obsessed with me, most of your posts are about me not the case. What are you really scared of, Georger,,,
-
Draw whatever conclusion suits you. I dont give a fuck ! You arent worth the trouble! Clearly you cant deal with facts.
-
If you spent more time on the case than attacking me your case knowledge might get beyond 2011..
-
Really? How do you know who is qualified or not .... ? Maybe a qualified person doesn't want to tangle with you? There could be many reasons why nobody answered ......... attitude is NOT science or LIFE ....
-
Judge
-
Judy Judy Judy
-
Since nobody here is qualified.. I'll find out,, I know a current commercial pilot..
-
There will be a very slight increase in drag, relatively speaking, but not the 2118.8 pounds that FlyJack claims. Nor a 10 - 20 Knot reduction in the airspeed as FlyJack also claims.
-
FlyJack, what I posted was not an insult. You apparently have little contact with the real world. If you do your numbers again as I asked you to do and come up with the same thing, then I will show you how to do it. You do understand that neither of us has accurate information about the aft stairs so if our numbers are even in the same ballpark, they will be acceptable. This will give you some experience in the art of number crunching.
-
I’m with you on the drag. Not sure how significant it would be but surely it would act as a speed brake of some sort.
-
Thanks, Robert,, I was asking for your input not for insults,,, Since you can't answer it I will pursue it elsewhere.. and ignore you for the remainder of your life. Clearly, you aren't qualified.
-
FlyJack, I am seriously beginning to question which planet you are coming from, and it does not seem to be the Earth. Since you have repeatedly refused to reveal what training you have, if any, in mathematics, physics, or aviation, I humbly submit that you should repeat your calculations and take care to adhere closely to the following suggestions. Use the same system of units in all your calculations. Don't switch between metric, nautical, or other systems without making the necessary corrections between the systems. The good old fashioned English system of feet, seconds, Miles Per Hour, etc., is still a great system and most of the posters on this site are probably familiar with it. Also, you list 194 MPH as being the airliners speed when Cooper jumped. Actually, the airliner was flying at 170 Knots Indicated Air Speed (KIAS), which results in a 194 Knots True Air Speed (KTAS) at 10,000 feet under the temperature and pressure conditions that then existed. And 194 KTAS is 225 Miles Per Hour. Double check your previous calculations and post the new ones.
-
Anything is possible if there isn’t demonstrable evidence showing otherwise. So you can put me in the “exceedingly skeptical but open to the possibility” category when it comes to all things Gunther haha. I was indeed fully convinced that the entire thing was performance art from Max until the 302 dropped. That certainly changed things.
-
Whenever a publisher decides to publish. The full manuscript is with several literary agents who expressed interest. Waiting to hear back from them to decide which one to go with (or even if they want to proceed!). But apparently it’s a good sign in the first place that agents expressed interest after reading the samples. I could always just publish through an internet publisher or whatever, but the book is pretty academic and I’d like for it to be “reliably published” with a real publisher. Last resort I could always go with Schaffner Publishing. That is Flo’s cousin and apparently he wants a Cooper book, but I’ve seen mixed reviews about them, so I haven’t contacted them.
-
Lisa Story has apparently got us pegged. OleMiss, when is your book going to be released.
-
Ok, fair comment.. it wasn't clear. Can we put you you in the skeptical but open to the possibility category then.. IMO, we can be both skeptical and pursue a theory,,
-
Sticking with my nasty habit of buying every book released about Cooper, today I received the new Reca book from Lisa Story. Scorched Earth should be the rule of the day with the Reca people. Normally, I’d say that suspect grifting on Cooper for profit is the most disdainful thing someone can do, but the Reca grift is even more worthy of disdain because of how insulting it is. That book has 100 pages essentially saying that “Cooper Nation”, as she calls it, are all a bunch of fools who can’t interpret evidence correctly. And not only are we fools but the pilots had no idea what they were doing and the stewardesses may as well have had the Men in Black flash the pen in their faces because their memory is so flawed that it should be outright ignored.
-
I have seen empirical evidence that he was contacted by someone in the 80’s. I don’t have that for 72. It’s not inconsistent to believe in something for which there is evidence but remain skeptical on something without it. If we unearth a 302 from Gunther in 72 claiming that DB Cooper himself wants to meet with him, then that will change my view on it. And I didn’t say I’m not “open to the possibility.” I said I find it improbable.
-
The Clara thing was a big deal in the Vortex,, it was clearly bogus.. your indifference was a tacit endorsement because you jump on everything. Extremely unlikely Barb was Clara though it is virtually impossible to prove a negation. I don't even consider it a legitimate theory, like claiming the crew took the money. You initially claimed Gunther made it all up, then the letter popped up in the FBI files,, now he was contacted in 82 but you still claim he made up the 72 contact. If you are open to the Clara/Barb thing, you should at least be open to possibility of the '72 contact with Gunther to be consistent.. but you aren't.
- Yesterday
-
Am I not allowed to be indifferent to things that pop up in the Vortex? I don’t have to challenge or endorse every topic. And I’m very open to Gunther being contacted by someone claiming to be Cooper’s wife, be it Barb or Cindy Lou Who. We have a 302 to back that up now. But I still find it improbable that he was contacted in 72 and then a decade later. That’s quite the long con for someone to play. What is your opinion on Barb possibly being Clara, Stylometry aside?
-
True, you didn't endorse it but you didn't really challenge it.. stylometry is random noise under 3000 word samples.. So, you are open to Barb being Clara but not Gunther being contacted by somebody claiming to be Cooper.. Makes perfect sense.
-
Sure Dudeman was incorrect about military main packing cards,, I kept pushing the issue and he looked beyond his assumption and discovered he got it wrong.. He did what most of you so called Cooper researcher's won't do,, question your own assumptions. If I hadn't pushed it we wouldn't know the truth. and you, Georger mocked me for suggesting the money rolled along the bottom of the River causing the rounding erosion.. Exactly the conclusion the geologist Palmer and the FBI reached. Why, because your first reaction to something that doesn't support your own assumption is to ridicule it. You do it every single time...
-
I never endorsed that. Sample size far too small for the Stylometry to be used. But I do remain open to that possibility due to the fact that Barb was a known Cooper bullshitter from that era and according to the Foreman’s (who don’t seem like outright liars…but maybe they are) she liked Gunther and True magazine.
