All Activity
This stream auto-updates
- Past hour
-
Did you try cancelling the charge through your credit card company?
- Today
-
very large bills.. a combination to include 1000's ,, he got lower bills,, it wasn't his error they didn't give him what he demanded. But that is irrelevant because he said that wasn't the real reason he returned.. As for motive,, that isn't clear, there is some evidence for political and for personal.. maybe both.. but it has not been confirmed.
-
It’s discountable or doesn’t count? Two different things. Would you discount all the research on tie particles that has not been shared yet? How about Ryan’s book? What about Pat’s contact with Alice? What about William Smith’s daughter who says she has all this info that rules him out? (And don’t say it’s not the family’s job to defend. That’s a whole other issue). How about someone like Tom who waits to publish in a journal? What is the timeline to hold onto information? Is it a year? 5 years? Until it gets to production as a film, or in the newspaper?
-
What denominations did he ask for? H had a political motive. Would you agree?
-
Not much, I see them but none are compelling,,, I am focussing on Hahneman as far as suspects and looking at other case evidence..
-
This s great example for why I avoid discussing Hahneman.. You have an opinion and are now searching for confirmation using assumptions.. No, he did not get the denominations mixed up,, they gave him the wrong denominations but he said he really returned to delay the flight to ensure a night jump. and the FBI was messing with him,, that didn't happen to Cooper,, circumstances were different, there are also some false reports in the news.. Tina said about Cooper.. he was not nervous he was rather nice other than he wanted certain things to be done he never tried to harm myself and although he was impatient a few times he was never cruel or nasty or impolite.. Rogers,, (Hahneman's stew) said Behaviour sounds very similar...
-
“Did he drop the ball? You’d have to ask him. I don’t know anything about that, you’re telling me this for the first time…” Yeah, I’m sure he’d claim to be as clueless about what his caddies are doing as he is about what his administration is doing…
-
Agreed. I don’t think anyone has ever asked you this but do you look into other suspects that come up in the 302s? There are some really promising ones that eventually get eliminated. I often wonder if there was some sort of error by the FBI that eliminated the real Cooper.
-
Witnesses saw a composite sketch... that sketch looks nothing like his image I posted comparing to Cooper's sketch A.. His sketch was good around the eyes, the very thing Cooper witnesses are weak on. Nose bad, hair bad.. That image of H comparing to sketch A doesn't make him Cooper but it shows that sketches and images are not as reliable as people assume they are.. Look at Cooper,, we have 3 completely different sketches and a 4th different image.. which one is Cooper?? Nobody knows.. He did go to prison.. cut a last minute deal.. a legit criticism but it doesn't eliminate him. If I assumed he can't be Cooper like everyone else and not pursued him then I would never have uncovered all the stuff I have.. like a huge error by the FBI. There is no arguing on teeth, Ryan lied and spread misinformation to support his opinion. He was missing two upper bicuspids, very difficult to see and very common for people who get braces.. NOT DISPOSITIVE.. So, people have eliminated him based on assumptions or misinformation from Ryan.. not facts. The correct position for others is to be skeptical, not to accept him as Cooper but do not eliminate based on assumptions.
-
The photos and sketches on record would very very difficult to get around. Besides those, the behavioral differences. I’ll take one…the denominations. Cooper had just jumped with 200k in twenties. He knows the size and weight of a large money ask for jumping out of a plane. I don’t see how he gets that mixed up for a second jump. He’d have been very clear from the start and would have recognized any variation immediately, not after take off. There are several other behavioral incongruities.
-
Hi Bill, I just finished reading this: Original Sin (Tapper and Thompson book) - Wikipedia Is there an opening for Biden there? Jerry Baumchen PS) If you are an American politics junkie, you should give it a look. PPS) And, the cover-up continues: Steve Ricchetti, who was a top adviser to former President Biden and considered to be in his inner circle, said Biden was “fully capable of exercising his presidential duties” Top Biden aide Steve Ricchetti tells GOP panel ex-president was ‘fully capable’
-
Didn’t Gregory see a pic of H and say it wasn’t a match? It’s somewhere in the FBI files. They refer to H as the highjacker from Honduras. I’m hoping we get more details in the vault soon. If H escaped after his highjacking you convinced me he’s one of the best suspects. He didn’t though. The idea that Cooper served many years in prison for highjacking a 2nd plane doesn’t seem plausible. I know you have your theories but man that’s a huge knock on him as a suspect. There’s so much arguing back and forth on the teeth and sketch but I feel like we’re missing the bigger picture here.
-
Why do you say he isn't Cooper,, what evidence demonstrates that.
-
More lessens. Signed up for X. Payed for Premium Plus in advance for a year. Set up my X Advertising account. Put in the ad... And imeadently there is a orange exclamation point. I find a message That the account has been locked because someone on the account had violated the terms of service? I had literally just signed up. Tried to find out what the problem was. Spent hours on line with a bot. It finally transferred me to a human, still by chat, they don't own a phone. Or it was supposed to. The chat just died. Nothing. Crickets. Tried to contact them by other means. Nothing. I payed for Premium Plus there is a line that they are actually supposed to answer. Nodda. Finally I get so sick of this that I cancel my whole account. They do not give refunds. $276.50 down the drain. Fuck my life. I swore that I would tell every one I met about this to the end of my days. I called my friend last night. Told him. Texted another. Told him. Meeting of the writer group coming up. You can bet that I'm going to tell all of them in the middle of the meeting. X is the Worst place to advertise of all of them. Never use X! You want to know what does work? BookBub! Signed up the same night as X. Totally different experience. Smooth. No problems. It's generating lots of views. And it's generating lots of clicks. More views, more clicks, less money, then I was spending on Amazon Sponsored Ads and they love my cover rather then kicking me off for it. BookBub rocks. And #@%$ X. Lee
-
It’s a spectrum. I would eliminate at 6’6’’ suspect definitively. So there is a category of suspect that’s just flat out, not Cooper. Based on the evidence on the record about H I would say he isn’t Cooper but with a caveat, show me new evidence and I’ll reconsider. I’m not reconsidering a 6’6’’ suspect. H did do a similar crime and is the right age, etc. And getting from 5’8’’-5’9’’ to 5’10’’-5’11’’ is conceivable. So I don’t see him as Cooper but would not definitively rule him out. Where I fully agree is that there’s something off. That’s why it hasn’t been solved. It’s been said that Cooper will be 15% different than one of the things considered fact/canonical. That’s something I believe to be the case.
-
Dr Hook
-
So, you have a false premise... people should be skeptical, I am one of the most skeptical people around.. question everything. Skeptical is the correct position.... When I started researching H I tried to find a reason to 100% eliminate him,, facts, not opinions. I still haven't found it.. and I did find a massive error by the FBI. Skepticism is not the issue,, the issue is guys like Ryan and now Nicky who harass and attack me personally for not accepting their positions.. as if they are some arbiter if truth... they just lie to discredit me to justify their own opinions, not facts. I have seen a lot in this case but the lies and personal attacks from Ryan are off the charts.. if I said here what I really think of him I would get banned. Ryan is suffering from a cognitive dissonance.. He knows I am a very good researcher but he has eliminated Hahneman.. those things are incompatible. To resolve this internal conflict he has decided that I have "psychological defect", "won't admit I am wrong", "have a confirmation bias" etc... He must destroy me to justify his own position. Ryan doesn't even consider that he may be wrong. Why does he care what I think,, because he is not confident in his own position and I am a threat. He doesn't attack others who actively push suspects that aren't Cooper.. Ryan doesn't attack Limbach for Skip,, even though Skip has severe forehead lines and facial lumps,, and the claim he is wearing Cooper's Towncraft tie in a pic is debunked.. way too short. Now Ryan finds himself in another dilemma... he claims sketch A is best (B is best) and I posted a pic of H that matches A very well.. but he has trashed H saying he is the worst match in the world.. He trashed me saying I am only biased for sketch B because of H,, Now, the cognitive dissonance will be off the charts.. Ryan will ignore it, manufacture some incoherent excuse or just attack me more.. So no, skepticism isn't the problem,, absolutism is,, it a cancer in this case. Absolutists are low level thinkers... they are detrimental to the advancement of this case.
-
You still didn't answer the question.. Have you eliminated him? not that you think he is Cooper.. but you know he isn't.
-
-
Fair. He doesn’t have to care what others think. He can sit on evidence he found. But that comes with an understanding that others are inherently going to be highly skeptical and critical and they are justified in being so. Also, I agree that DNA, clear video, a hundred eyewitnesses, fingerprints and a full confession wouldn’t convince 100% of people. That’s not really my point. I’m just noting that until evidence is available on the record -that is available for public scrutiny- it’s easily discountable. It doesn’t count. Show it or be ready to be discounted. That’s how it works, right?
-
I think you’re fairly new to the group, maybe not to the case. You may or may not know the history here. Fly really does not spend much time selling Hahneman. It really only happens as a result of Ryan’s comments. Fly is one of those guys who does not need the spotlight. He works independently and from what I’ve learned, he values the process and the analysis. He has quite an array of hobbies and life experiences. He found one guitar that was pretty cool and made on CNN, but the one he just found is even better. He doesn’t brag. He will sit on info for years, and does not need the community approval. Frankly no one does. If he gets what he needs, then it does not matter what this community says. At least that’s how I feel and operate. Plenty of well known researchers want nothing to do with this group. Who should Fly show his info to? Eric? Nicky? Ryan? He’s had info basically stolen already. You see how Ryan and Nicky tried to gang up on him. This has been going on for a while. You simply can not trust the group. It leaks like a sieve. If people don’t believe him then so be it. It’s just funny how people fell all over Eric’s particle analysis and then Vordhal and then Hall. So even if Fly showed a video of Hahnemann hijacking 305, the usual suspects would discount it. I don’t think he cares if the group believes him or not. I don’t.
-
That’s good but it doesn’t overcome the obstacle. It’s like any unknown suspect, the goods might be there but until submitted it’s not viable. Otherwise anyone could claim they found Cooper without showing key evidence. If someone wants to build up their evidence base in private..cool. But it doesn’t prove anything in anyone else’s eyes. It might be the real McCoy (so sorry, had to) or it might be hype. The vortex has seen its share of hype. I’m not saying Fly doesn’t have more, I’m saying no one will believe it until they can inspect it and that’s the appropriate response.
-
I can only evaluate the evidence on record. The evidence on record show the sketch made of H looks like the photos of him immediately after his skyjacking. The sketch’s of Cooper don’t look like him IMO. But beyond just my opinion, a poll of his photo post skyjacking and both H/C sketches wouldn’t be close, at all. Is any of that definitive, nahh. But it’s big problem. One that is not overcome-able without new evidence. And until that evidence is submitted for scrutiny by the larger community it can’t counted because it can’t be falsified or contextualized. It might exist, but it doesn’t count. Once it’s available, different story. But until then…
-
You didn't answer the question.. FWW,, I am not making the case here or now... maybe tomorrow I find something that eliminates him 100%..