chuckakers

Hope you can join us this Saturday, July 16th and next Saturday, July 23rd. Details at http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=181589145236086 Chuck Akers D-10855 Houston, TX

Mud, and being unable to sleep because of the noise all night come to mind. Like Woodstock, eh Professor? Chuck Akers D-10855 Houston, TX

If it’s just common sense how come some many people have died because of it? Maybe it’s good to point it out at every opportunity. Sparky What percentage of canopy collision victims have actually been killed by swoopers during performance turns? Chuck Akers D-10855 Houston, TX

ew, dats uuuugly. Chuck Akers D-10855 Houston, TX

Apparently..... Chuck Akers D-10855 Houston, TX

Really? Have you never heard of sociopaths? Pretty sure the word you're looking for is psychopath. Uh, no. so·ci·o·path noun sociopaths, plural 1. A person with a personality disorder manifesting itself in extreme antisocial attitudes and behavior and a lack of conscience Chuck Akers D-10855 Houston, TX

That's just too easy. Chuck Akers D-10855 Houston, TX

Bingo. Chuck Akers D-10855 Houston, TX

Really? Have you never heard of sociopaths? Chuck Akers D-10855 Houston, TX

I have no idea. If you don't care about the subject, why are you replying? To make others think the same thing rather than argue aimlessly on the interwebz Take another hit, dude. On second thought, maybe not. Chuck Akers D-10855 Houston, TX

Here's another one, folks. Tink says Casey is "obviously" guilty, even though a jury of 12 people unanimously agreed the prosecution failed to prove that. Think what you want, but you'll have a hard time convincing the justice system. It already decided otherwise. And soon the "killer" will have enough money to buy you. Guess she wins. Chuck Akers D-10855 Houston, TX

I have no idea. If you don't care about the subject, why are you replying? Chuck Akers D-10855 Houston, TX

Damn. Did a complete uninstall/renistall of VMS and DVD Arc, re-registered then both, opened both programs. Still no audio. I also tried the instructions on this link, which sounded like my problem. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ux9_ZoY4T_g It also failed to fix anything. Any suggestions? Chuck Akers D-10855 Houston, TX

I would disagree with you on that one, John. A police investigator is exactly the kind of person to do that, because they would know how to. Yet the remains were found just lying in the woods on the ground. Why didn't he bury them? For someone who supposedly knew how to cover-up a murder, he didn't do a very good job of it. Assuming dad did stage a murder, he wasn't covering it up, he was creating it. And if he did, he wasn't likely covering up an innocent accidental death as you said. That would be unnecessary of course. If he staged a murder it was to cover up something that could have sent someone to jail - like an accidental chloroform overdose. Additionally, the body was found in a swampy area that had been under standing water for an extended period (that's why it wasn't found during an earlier search of the area). Being under water would break the body tissue down rapidly, destroying evidence along the way and permanently changing or destroying any chemical compounds in the body. I'm not convinced dad had anything to do with it, but there have been many cases of cops staging crimes, so it wouldn't be a stretch to believe he did. Chuck Akers D-10855 Houston, TX

Some might, John. I won't. Huh? Do you mean you would have no reservations about Casey's abilities as a loving mother and would not fear for the well-being of another baby from her? You think she's innocent of any wrong-doing? Not at all. I'm just saying I won't be worrying. I can understand someone not caring about Casey, the mom. But any future children of hers inherit no such guilt, in whatever manner Casey deserves. And since there is plenty of doubt as to wheter or not she is truly innocent of murder, or of using cholorform on her child, then I think it's legitimate to be concerned about the well-being of any future children of hers. And you seem to be saying that you just don't care... That's very cold-hearted. I didn't say I didn't care. I said I wouldn't worry about her having more children. Murder aside, doing something stupid that hurts a child is no indicator that one would do something stupid again or to another child. People have left babies in hot cars, allowed kids to gain access to household cleaners, and done any number of stupid things that have hurt or killed children. Should we worry about those folk's next kid? People do stupid things, sometimes with horrifying consequences. That doesn't mean they would do something equally stupid again. For what it's worth, everyone that knows Casey said she was an excellent and very caring mother. I would think if she had a pattern of behavior to be worried about, folks nearest her would have a different opinion. And above all else Casey Anthony didn't commit murder, at least according to the jury that actually heard the testimony and saw the evidence that the armchair quarterbacks didn't. Chuck Akers D-10855 Houston, TX

Not sure about the Nancy Grace effect, but for sure the justice system worked as designed - even if people think the verdict was wrong. Chuck Akers D-10855 Houston, TX

The theory that the defense was proposing was that it was an accidental drowning, and then Dad came along and helped hide the body to protect his daughter from charges that she was an unfit mother for not supervising the child more closely. I don't buy that theory. The father was a former police detective. He would know that covering up a death would just be discovered, and make you look guilty of murder. While accidents happen all the time, with no charges being filed. A police detective would not choose to cover-up an innocent accidental death. I would disagree with you on that one, John. A police investigator is exactly the kind of person to do that, because they would know how to. Moreover, the fact that the verdict was not guilty tells me that if it was a staged murder it was done very well. Chuck Akers D-10855 Houston, TX

That's my point. They didn't prove it or there would have been a guilty verdict. All it took to free the defendant was reasonable doubt, and the jury obviously had that. Chuck Akers D-10855 Houston, TX

Some might, John. I won't. Huh? Do you mean you would have no reservations about Casey's abilities as a loving mother and would not fear for the well-being of another baby from her? You think she's innocent of any wrong-doing? Not at all. I'm just saying I won't be worrying. And on your question, I'm not saying that Casey didn't do anything wrong. It's pretty obvious that she knows a buttload more than she told authorities, but it's big leap to say that because she lied to the cops and kept quiet about Caylee's disappearance that she therefore must have committed murder. I think everyone that has said and especially those still saying Casey killed Caylee are talking out of their asses. There are an infinite number of other possibilities on how that little girl died and who killed her than the automatic assumption that Casey did it. Casey is a clearly an odd woman. Odd enough to be head over heals in love with a boyfriend (or perceived boyfriend) and to cover for him after he accidentally killed the baby showing Casey how to knock a kid out with chloroform so she could go party. How about Dad? Could he have killed the kid? He certainly had easy access to the child. Or Mom? She called 911 to say her car smelled like a dead body and that Casey wasn't coming forward with information about Caylee being missing. That would sure be a great way to point the finger at Casey. Crazy ideas? Maybe, but no more crazy than a mother committing the same crime. And oddly, mom and dad blew out of the courtroom the very moment Casey was declared not guilty of killing Caylee, and as of this writing their lawyer says they haven't spoken to Casey since the verdict came in. That is more than weird. One would think they would be elated with the verdict and anxious to talk to her. And it is definitely a possibility - and in my opinion, probability - that Caylee's death was an accident of some sort (as in the chloroform example) and that a murder was staged to cover for the negligence. Everyone that knows Casey said she was an excellent mother and very loving and responsible and her parents were very involved in the child's life, so killing the kid just to be free to party at will doesn't make any sense. I spent a few years as a military police investigator and one of the primary principals in that line of work is to assume nothing and rule nothing out that isn't otherwise disproved through physical evidence. I think it is very short-sighted to say Casey committed murder given the lack of physical evidence to prove it. What bothers me most is that many of the people claiming she's guilty would have the exact opposite position if they or a loved one was at the defendant's table. Chuck Akers D-10855 Houston, TX

I'm guessing she'll take up golf so she can begin her search for the real killer. You know, I've been searching for an OJ reference in this case that I can use on my day job as a radio guy. That line may actually be worth doing. Awesome. You'll be doing your part to continue to promote the idea that radio shows like yours are an intellectual wasteland. So you listen to the show. Thanks! Chuck Akers D-10855 Houston, TX

I predict she'll be free in a year, then she'll get pregnant again, and we'll all spend much time worrying about the fate of her next child... Some might, John. I won't. Chuck Akers D-10855 Houston, TX

I'm guessing she'll take up golf so she can begin her search for the real killer. You know, I've been searching for an OJ reference in this case that I can use on my day job as a radio guy. That line may actually be worth doing. Chuck Akers D-10855 Houston, TX

I'll take your liver. Chuck Akers D-10855 Houston, TX

"The courts" didn't acquit her. A jury made up of people who likely know very little about "the courts" did. If what you are saying is that juries are more lenient, you may have a point, but my reply was addressed to what you said, not what you may have meant. Either way you want to interpret my statement, it's still valid. I didn't interpret anything. I read and fully comprehended the words you wrote. I'm funny like that. Chuck Akers D-10855 Houston, TX

"The courts" didn't acquit her. A jury made up of people who likely know very little about "the courts" did. If what you are saying is that juries are more lenient, you may have a point, but my reply was addressed to what you said, not what you may have meant. Chuck Akers D-10855 Houston, TX