dreamdancer

can you now pick out the bit where it says fraudulent votes were cast

So basically although there was election fraud, it had no verifiable impact on the outcome of the election. this seems to be the case

both of you come back when you find some actual votes cast

or, none were discovered because none were cast

they've relied on the facts

such lovely friends... http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/nov/28/us-embassy-cables-saudis-iran?intcmp=239 stay away from moving propellers - they bite blue skies from thai sky adventures good solid response-provoking keyboarding

i've already provided a source - which you've ignored. keep up... stay away from moving propellers - they bite blue skies from thai sky adventures good solid response-provoking keyboarding

can't argue with that stay away from moving propellers - they bite blue skies from thai sky adventures good solid response-provoking keyboarding

i don't know. what do you think? stay away from moving propellers - they bite blue skies from thai sky adventures good solid response-provoking keyboarding

do you? stay away from moving propellers - they bite blue skies from thai sky adventures good solid response-provoking keyboarding

If there was fraudulent registration then there was ELECTION FRAUD. but no fraudulent votes were cast - so no real harm done

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_racial_violence_in_the_United_States stay away from moving propellers - they bite blue skies from thai sky adventures good solid response-provoking keyboarding

matthewcline, there were no fraudulent votes. you can go round in circles asking as many times as you want - but rest your weary head - there were no fraudulent votes

but nothing to do with ACORN

Yes. THat's part of election fraud. What you are saying is similar to, "HE didn't commit great bodily injury. The injury wasn't to the body - he hacked his arms off." no, it's similar to saying 'he thought about committing a crime but didn't so no harm done.' stay away from moving propellers - they bite blue skies from thai sky adventures good solid response-provoking keyboarding

You'll hear that Donald Duck, Mary Poppins, Dick Tracy, Mickey Mouse and (new this year) the starting lineup of the Dallas Cowboys football team have all had fraudulent registrations submitted in their names. That's true. And we know this, why? Because Acorn told officials about it when they followed the law and turned in those registrations, flagged as fraudulent. What you won't hear is that federal law requires anybody who does not register to vote in person at the county office to show an ID when they go to vote the first time. So, unless Donald Duck shows up with his ID, he won't be voting this November. You needn't worry, no matter how much even John McCain himself cynically and dishonourably tries to mislead you. If it quacks like a duck, in this case, it's likely another Republican Acorn voter fraud lie. They haul it out every two years. Just days before the 2004 presidential election, rightwing whack job Michelle Malkin claimed that Acorn was registering terrorists to vote in swing state Ohio. Problem was, that was a lie. In 2006, again just days before the election, the new US attorney in swing state Missouri (recently appointed, since the one before him refused to bring such charges), filed voter fraud indictments against Acorn workers in the state. Problem was, bringing election-related indictments that close to an election was a violation of the department of justice's own written policy. And Acorn had nothing to do with it, other than turning in the employees to officials. Getting the picture? It's a hoax. All of it. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.guardian.co.uk/...on-acorn-voter-fraud stay away from moving propellers - they bite blue skies from thai sky adventures good solid response-provoking keyboarding

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2008/oct/13/election-acorn-voter-fraud stay away from moving propellers - they bite blue skies from thai sky adventures good solid response-provoking keyboarding

there were no fraudulent votes. thus there can be no 'source' that shows there were fraudulent votes. if you find a source then you can get back to the thread with more than your opinion

tell me when you get that source

which will be when taxes are increased on the super rich

there were no fraudulent votes. this is all about registering to vote - not actual voting

no, they didn't. this is just another dollop of drivel from a comedy source... stay away from moving propellers - they bite blue skies from thai sky adventures good solid response-provoking keyboarding

http://www.alternet.org/economy/148987/thom_hartmann%3A_why_tax_increases_would_boost_our_wages/ stay away from moving propellers - they bite blue skies from thai sky adventures good solid response-provoking keyboarding

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/comment/jeremy-warner/8158027/Germany-wallows-in-golden-autumn.html stay away from moving propellers - they bite blue skies from thai sky adventures good solid response-provoking keyboarding

except in this instance palin is an idiot stay away from moving propellers - they bite blue skies from thai sky adventures good solid response-provoking keyboarding