narcimund

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content

    3,736

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback

    0%

Everything posted by narcimund

  1. narcimund
    ... for about 5 seconds First Class Citizen Twice Over
  2. narcimund
    In general when reprinting someone else's words I recommend giving them proper credit. Guess who? First Class Citizen Twice Over
  3. narcimund
    Actually, that sounds EXACTLY like tailoring the kid to be some specific amount of masculinity. First Class Citizen Twice Over
  4. narcimund
    You might want to invest that and pass it on to your kids. They're going to need it more than you do. First Class Citizen Twice Over
  5. narcimund
    This is a real shame. He's a shining example of someone who can disagree honorably, with humor, and with good will. First Class Citizen Twice Over
  6. narcimund
    That's not a very good counter example. While tobacco is essentially 'legal', it's on the fast track to being so punitively regulated and taxed as to effectively simulate prohibition. In other words, it's another way the US government creatively sidesteps the limits it no longer feels like abiding by. First Class Citizen Twice Over
  7. narcimund
    You're very skilled at missing where he does "address the post." I've been amused watching you do that all over the place. Quite a skill. Is it marketable? Maybe you could teach classes. First Class Citizen Twice Over
  8. narcimund
    Let me get this straight... you're advocating genocide to avenge your brother? First Class Citizen Twice Over
  9. narcimund
    Ah yes, good old conservative, freedom-loving, stay-out-of-people's-business values. First Class Citizen Twice Over
  10. narcimund
    I completely agree. We've gotten amazing bottles from Liqueurs De France. Do NOT buy any bright green absinthe or any czech impostors. Nothing sold over the counter in Canada is real and it tastes like mouthwash. Buy the real thing or just stick with Pernod. First Class Citizen Twice Over
  11. narcimund

    Threesomes

    narcimund replied to pop's topic in The Bonfire

    First Class Citizen Twice Over
  12. narcimund
    That's exactly what gravitymaster said: http://www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=2097823;search_string=psychic;#2097820 First Class Citizen Twice Over
  13. narcimund
    I've been told in another thread that my sense of humor is faulty so could you explain what's funny about this? To me it just looks like a handicapped person died in a horrible accident. First Class Citizen Twice Over
  14. narcimund
    All they need to restore their unquestioned (and unquestionable) power is another catastrophic flood of panic -- which of course is what started this whole thing in the first place. There's no way anyone could doubt bush and his people know that. It's simply a question of when they'll choose to trigger it. Before November? Or sometime in 2008? First Class Citizen Twice Over
  15. narcimund
    I'm sure Rushmc will now abandon the thread. Even HE can't figure out a way to miss the point any more. First Class Citizen Twice Over
  16. narcimund
    Dropzone.com is at its most entertaining when people progress from (1) arguing against a position with me to (2) arguing against EVERYTHING I say to (3) stalking me just to make it personal. Like this fellow here who uses this serious thread about the Serbian government and their ex-head-of-state to spontaneously introduce speculation about my personal view of himself. Talk about non sequiturs and obsession with personalities! Edited to add for the less well-read among us: non sequitur: noun 1. An inference or conclusion that does not follow from the premises or evidence. 2. A statement that does not follow logically from what preceded it. Or more commonly: A statement with absolutely no discernible connection to what preceded it. First Class Citizen Twice Over
  17. narcimund
    Last time I checked (and admittedly it's been a while) very few religions give to governments the responsibility for choosing who goes to hell. First Class Citizen Twice Over
  18. narcimund
    Anarchist! How archaic. Nowadays when you want to demonize someone but you don't know what you're talking about, you're supposed to call them a "terrorist", not "anarchist." Anarchist is the knee-jerk insult from the early 1900s. In the mid-1900s it was "communist". Keep up, OK? First Class Citizen Twice Over
  19. narcimund
    Just for the sake of the argument, how do you discern between people being wrong and people just plain disagreeing with you? Ah! That's an epistemological problem. First Class Citizen Twice Over
  20. narcimund
    Amateurs? Perhaps. Or maybe they needed to cheat to get an outcome required by politics but not justified by the truth. First Class Citizen Twice Over
  21. narcimund
    Good policy. I also don't look down on people for disagreeing. I look down on people for being wrong. There's a difference. First Class Citizen Twice Over
  22. narcimund
    Yes, I am a strong advocate for this and several other unusual tactics. Namely: "Telling the Truth", "Making Accurate Observations", and "Understanding Complex Concepts." I recommend those tactics. First Class Citizen Twice Over
  23. narcimund
    Great observation. There's a tremendous resemblance to Ignatius in most of the bush-worshippers on dropzone.com. First Class Citizen Twice Over
  24. narcimund
    You are a man. Do you never joke? I think he was joking. Yes, I do joke. No, I do not believe he was joking. First Class Citizen Twice Over
  25. narcimund
    Coming from a man I don't think it was. First Class Citizen Twice Over