narcimund

Members
  • Content

    3,736
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback

    0%

Everything posted by narcimund

  1. Sure. I've been with my spouse for over 7 years. We're in love but even more important (in my humble opinion) we deeply trust each other. Oh, and we really like each other. During our first couple of years we lived 100 miles apart but saw each other most weekends. We found ways to talk as much as possible in between. Most days as soon as I got up I'd read poetry until I found something I wanted to share then I'd type it up and email it first thing. Sometimes the poem would resonate throughout the things we'd say to each other all day. Then we were able to live together. We immediately combined our work and formed a joint business which eventually grew to the entire floor of our office building and employed lots of people. For years we've generally spent 20 hours a day together, working, playing, entertaining, skydiving, base jumping, or having other adventures. We also manage really well when we're apart but love coming together again. A year ago we moved out of the city (and country) we both grew up in. Now we're making a new life together here in Canada. That's the biggest adventure yet! Through all of this we've given each other our best respect, learned from each other, and learned together what neither could teach. We're always friends first and each others' best friend. We're faithful to each other through and through. Keeping each other's trust means showing our weaknesses when necessary, overcoming them sincerely when possible, and celebrating our best qualities always! Seven years isn't forever -- yet. But it's a good start. First Class Citizen Twice Over
  2. What a spectacular, egotistical non-sequitur. If it were even SLIGHTLY relevant I'd say it helps prove my point but sadly it's just a random, angry gesture of no consequence. First Class Citizen Twice Over
  3. Hawkins121, one of the most vocal of the "conservatives" on the forum wrote this in another thread. It seems like a whole topic of its own: ***The government allows me to live my life. Earn a living, live in a decent place, go skydiving etc etc.. The gov provides us with stability that we often take for granted.... Whatever they have to do to protect the freedoms I have I will support. I'd call this a definition of modern conservatism. But does anyone here remember what we USED to call it? First Class Citizen Twice Over
  4. And this, my friends, is the new definition of "conservative." Those among us with ANY education will recognize that it's the opposite of the definition as of only 20 years ago. First Class Citizen Twice Over
  5. I'm old enough to remember when being conservative meant being AGAINST government intrusion into personal lives. Now it means to celebrate it. First Class Citizen Twice Over
  6. Stupid right wing response #2: WAHHHHHH! Little crybaby american thinks human right matter. Boo hoo. First Class Citizen Twice Over
  7. [replyOr this. Didn't hear much bitching when this happened. Stupid right wing response #1: Mommy! Mommy! Little Billy Clinton down the street did it FIIIIIRRRRRSSSSSTTTTT!!!!!!!!!!!!! First Class Citizen Twice Over
  8. Watch. Any minute now rushmc or gravitymaster will come into the thread to tell us that it's only RIGHT that exonerating witnesses should disappear. Terrorists defend themselves, they'll say, thus judicial defenses are signs of terrorism. First Class Citizen Twice Over
  9. You might be sincere but this sentence sounds REALLY SLIMY. First Class Citizen Twice Over
  10. My god, that's amazing! What do you call this act? First Class Citizen Twice Over
  11. Because the US is an aggressive monster raging around the world getting its frustrations and hungers out on the backs of everyone else. If I had another planet to live on, I'd be less concerned. First Class Citizen Twice Over
  12. Michelle, who I used to think had sense, said, Which reminds me of an earlier poster who said, Michelle seems to approve of circumventing American law. But that's no surprise. 51% of american voters seemed to agree in 2004. Very sad. First Class Citizen Twice Over
  13. Not to mention the biggest of them all: On the one hand, we're "at war" so all sorts of administratively-handy wartime precedents are triggered. On the other hand, there's been no congressional declaration of war so all sorts of undesirable different precedents are NOT triggered. I'm only surprised this sort of childish maneuver works. Surprised and sad... First Class Citizen Twice Over
  14. The truth hurts huh? I guess you really meant what you said? First Class Citizen Twice Over
  15. Bait bait bait. We have a serious maturity mismatch going on here. First Class Citizen Twice Over
  16. The sentence deserves repeating. First Class Citizen Twice Over
  17. Limbaugh has instructed his followers how to interpret statements like yours: They're supposed to presume you're lying about having once been on their side. Clever tactic. First Class Citizen Twice Over
  18. He's implying that Limbaugh paid the fine and signed the agreement solely for practical reasons. In other words, he believes Limbaugh has no principles and is willing to sign his name to any falsehood so long as it makes people stop harassing him. First Class Citizen Twice Over
  19. Actually, I think his reasoning and research fly very well around here. I notice the loudest posters will bitch about anything he says just out of personal ego or vitriol, but whenever there's a poll, Bill's positions come out way far ahead of yours. You apparently mistake noise and fuss for truth. Keep posting though. I bet it makes you feel better, doesn't it? First Class Citizen Twice Over
  20. You are SO CUTE! First Class Citizen Twice Over
  21. Ann Coulter follows the same pattern. It's successful. First Class Citizen Twice Over
  22. God is an orgasm? This is going to come as a shock to a lot of self-righteous, sex-hating christians right after they die. First Class Citizen Twice Over
  23. If you PM me your mailing address, I'd be happy to send you a mirror for your birthday. Back to ideas: Is anyone else amused that the thrice-divorced Limbaugh preaches for the sanctity of marriage? First Class Citizen Twice Over
  24. He would if his partisan politics led him to believe he'd personally see economic benefit from it. First Class Citizen Twice Over
  25. you might've neglected to read my other posts in this thread. I'll give you a moment to do so, then you can come back... You mean the posts where you admit that you're projecting? First Class Citizen Twice Over