skinnay

You've obviously never been to Thailand.

http://i628.photobucket.com/albums/uu2/FenrirMX/Cool%20Story%20Bro/CoolStoryBroHouse.jpg

Looks like Perry's new strategy is just to say what all the conservative candidates think but are too afraid to say. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0PAJNntoRgA

The technical faults of your post have already been pointed out. All I will do is to request you name one country that offers its citizens the amount of freedom we enjoy in the USA. Um, ok.. http://www.stateofworldliberty.org/report/rankings.html

Oh right, "nationwide". Sorrry

Yes americans you are so free. Let me know how it goes when you want to burn an american flag or video tape a police officer

Well, people believe in god so this sort of deductive reasoning doesn't surprise me in the slightest.

You can make a pretty good guess though..

Ah yes, I'm sure America's conservatives will go down in history as the copernicus of our time.

Oh really? Damn. Well good thing America has conservative scientists like you to set them straight.

Not exactly peer reviewed science. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eaADQTeZRCY That's why there are citations.

Post 170: "It seems as though there would be a level playing field between these billions of dollars and research grants, and the billions of dollars in exxon mobile profits." I'm not suggesting skeptics are driven by money. I'm just saying there's plenty of money coming from both sides. You're talking about the AGW crowd, right? What with changing data to fit the hypothesis and not the other way around... It wouldn't surprise me if a few scientists had an agenda or tampered data. If thousands did globally, that would surprise me. Ah, yes.. that 75 of 77 respondents to an online survey... all hail the 97 percent! Must be a pretty lame argument if you have to bring in religion and politics as a counter. This is the 97% I'm talking about. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change#Surveys_of_scientists_and_scientific_literature Classic confirmation bias. This would actually be "classic confirmation bias" if I was a skeptic. I'd love to believe this, but I don't.

And yet, you're willing to believe that the skeptics are driven solely by greed. Did I say something about skeptics and greed? I'm actually more willing to believe that they're just not scientists and don't have the slightest clue about climate science. I'm more willing to believe that 97% of the world's climate scientists are smarter than america's christian conservatives. Don't get me wrong.. I LOVE a good conspiracy. But for climate scientists to orchestrate the scam you're accusing them of would take the cake for the greatest scam in the history of mankind. But simply the fact that there's 80 billion in global funding for research, doesn't make a great case.

If all of those supposed profits were bankrolling skeptic research, you might have a point. Since it's not....well. AGW Research funding: ~80 billion Exxon mobile funding: 23 million YOU do the math. so do you think all climate scientists are just bankrolling tons of cash and ballin' out with tons of hookers and blow every night?

A 188 will have you loaded at about 1.1. I wouldn't go smaller than that. It dives pretty fast, and it doesn't take a very hard toggle turn to see your shadow on the canopy

If all of those supposed profits were bankrolling skeptic research, you might have a point. Since it's not....well. AGW Research funding: ~80 billion Exxon mobile funding: 23 million YOU do the math. so do you think all climate scientists are just bankrolling tons of cash and ballin' out with tons of hookers and blow every night?

You can get some great deals on sex like that.. http://www.sociallunchbox.com/public/slb/imagecache/600x600-preview/files/images/fifteen-bucks-for-sex-on-meth.jpeg

Follow the money. Billions in research grants add up quick. Barely a drop in the bucket compared to the FAR FAR more billions in profits of utilities, coal companies and oil companies and the very few who profit from them and yet are always paranoid about all those silly regulations that protect the American people from the pollution they try to spew. Not applicable to the conversation at hand, which was about scientists and not companies. Do try again, however. It seems as though there would be a level playing field between these billions of dollars and research grants, and the billions of dollars in exxon mobile profits. Its a bit strange that 97% of scientists globally would be fabricating the greatest scientific lie of all time because they wanted research grant money, rather than money from the oil and coal industry.

Just out of curiosity, why do you think it is that 97% of scientists disagree with you? Is it all part of the liberal agenda? or are they just plain stupid? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change#Surveys_of_scientists_and_scientific_literature

The company is run by scumbags, but you may be able to get your money's worth. What you should sort out first is where and when you can make your skydive. They often use groupons to fill up their weekday schedule which isnt possible for most people to follow through with. As for safety, there's a couple threads around showing some questionable practices as well as poor aircraft maintenance. And someone can correct me, but didn't the perkasie king air have its 4th landing gear collapse this summer?

But what else is new.. http://www.good.is/post/poll-finds-fox-news-is-worse-than-no-news-at-all/ http://publicmind.fdu.edu/2011/knowless/

No matter how hard you try to fluff up this "linking arms is an "affirmative act"" argument, I don't think the civilized world will buy it.

http://radio.foxnews.com/toddstarnes/top-stories/obama-leaves-god-out-of-thanksgiving-address.html Morons. The top facebook comments are pretty funny though.

Do you have any details on where to stay and such? are you organizing a package type thing? I could use a tan! :)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sLSveRGmpIE