marks2065

To whom is he offering this proof, if not the government? Do you really thing healthcare costs will go down if doctors need to provide evidence for every test, and have that evidence reviewed? How much time will the doctor spend putting together his cases for the 20 strep tests he wants to order today? Who paying the person (not government employed, apparently) who reviews those 20 files every day? I think you need to review your cost saving plan a little. It is a prooven fact that doctors order unneeded tests to cover their but from lawsuites and other things like that, if the insurance companies and the government backed off and just let doctors run only the needed test it would save alot of money.

only because the pattent has run out, many drugs are still controled by the company that made them. every drug is cheaper that hits the generic market.

I did not say that, I said order only the tests taht are needed and the doctor needs to proove they are needed, what part of my statement said that the government should order test? please reread and rethink your post.

Yep, who needs all those MRI machines and CAT scanners anyway. And $6,000/month cancer drugs. Leeches are cheap and were good enough for your great grandfather; they should be good enough for you. opening the drug market to generic would greatly decrease drug pricing.

tort reform and selling insurance across state lines would be a good start. only ordering tests that are medically needed and making the doctors proove that the test is needed.

yes we do, make health care cheaper to provide and make people responsible for the bill. garnish wages to pay for the bill. work to bring down insurance premiums instead of making them higher so more can afford insurance so they don't hae this happen to them.

the parts that went into effect, like no turning down anyone, no lifetime limits, and children on policy until 26. what many don't understand is that most of the big things are already in effect.

No, it was to point out that some felons voted and to assume that helped the dems. I don't think there was any "asuming"

yep that the dem's fucked us, the bill did nothing to reduce costs, my costs went up. my shops insurance coverage has been reduced causing more out of pocket costs and insurance went up $4000 last year alone. ($1000 per person a year) yep I deffinately see a tend.

That doesn't mean that you get a freebie, just that you won't dye because you are broke.

The rep's wanted tort reform but the party in power that created the health care policy decided it wasn't needed. maybe you need to call Obama and Polosi and recommend some tort reform. The article you put up does say that the Rep party wanted to do somethingthing to help control health care costs and knew that something had to be done, but they couldn't get past a federal mandate to carry health insurance and that is why it died. I'm quite in favor of tort reform. I'm also in favor of holding freeloaders like this "plaintiff" responsible for their own health care costs. If youare in favor of these 2 items, why didn't you support the GOP and call out the dem party when this was all going through congress? Instead all I heard from you was the rep party were idiots and the party of no. Sounds like you are in favor of single issue voters. On balance, I find the GOP's policies, especially on social issues, to be mostly repugnant, and GOP pols to be, with a few exceptions, a bunch of hypocrites. Another missdirection? If you are in favor of people paying their own bills and tort reform why did you not speak out against the dem's when the health care bill was going through congress? I would prefer a single payer system. The GOP just favors health freeloaders. Show me one quote that says that the GOP thinks freeloading is what they want. they just dissagree with a federal mandate. I most agree with them, especially those that work hard. A federal mandate does not make people pay for insurance, only that they have insurance. The only ones paying are those that work hard and try to make their own way through life without sucking on the government teet.

The rep's wanted tort reform but the party in power that created the health care policy decided it wasn't needed. maybe you need to call Obama and Polosi and recommend some tort reform. The article you put up does say that the Rep party wanted to do somethingthing to help control health care costs and knew that something had to be done, but they couldn't get past a federal mandate to carry health insurance and that is why it died. I'm quite in favor of tort reform. I'm also in favor of holding freeloaders like this "plaintiff" responsible for their own health care costs. If youare in favor of these 2 items, why didn't you support the GOP and call out the dem party when this was all going through congress? Instead all I heard from you was the rep party were idiots and the party of no. Sounds like you are in favor of single issue voters. On balance, I find the GOP's policies, especially on social issues, to be mostly repugnant, and GOP pols to be, with a few exceptions, a bunch of hypocrites. Another missdirection? If you are in favor of people paying their own bills and tort reform why did you not speak out against the dem's when the health care bill was going through congress?

The rep's wanted tort reform but the party in power that created the health care policy decided it wasn't needed. maybe you need to call Obama and Polosi and recommend some tort reform. The article you put up does say that the Rep party wanted to do somethingthing to help control health care costs and knew that something had to be done, but they couldn't get past a federal mandate to carry health insurance and that is why it died. I'm quite in favor of tort reform. I'm also in favor of holding freeloaders like this "plaintiff" responsible for their own health care costs. If youare in favor of these 2 items, why didn't you support the GOP and call out the dem party when this was all going through congress? Instead all I heard from you was the rep party were idiots and the party of no.

just like a liberal to chop the sentence in half to change the entire meaning of what was said. If I remember correctly, The GOP wanted to do a couple things to reduce the cost of health care that did not have a federal mandate but that was blocked by the real party of no, the dem party.

Looks to me like a RECOUNT gave him the victory. I did not know that 'felons' could 'give' anyone a victory....but a nice headline for Faux News. I have no issue with any and all Citizens being able to vote, even convicted felons on death row. Look at all the trouble it would rid the process of.... I think what was the reason for the post was to point out that voter fraud did happen and that fraud helped the dem's.

The rep's wanted tort reform but the party in power that created the health care policy decided it wasn't needed. maybe you need to call Obama and Polosi and recommend some tort reform. The article you put up does say that the Rep party wanted to do somethingthing to help control health care costs and knew that something had to be done, but they couldn't get past a federal mandate to carry health insurance and that is why it died.

Is the bullshit in this post from planet earth? Apparently not. It is from RWC planet earth that only exists in the minds of RWCs? You have GOT to stop watching Faux Spews. Running the same foorage of TWO black men in a mostly black precinct over and over, hundreds of times a day, for days on end, does not equate to a massive "Black Panther" conspiracy. The facts of the situation are those gentlemen were there to protect the black voters for being harassed or assaulted by RWCs of northen european ancestry who have been led to believe things that are not true. The "massive frauds perpetrated by Democrat surrogates" are yet another example of the disinformation propogated by Faux Spews and happily consumed by credulous nitwits that are RWCs. That shit ain't real, in spite of it being on TV. It is what is called "fiction". Look it up and be ashamed. I think you are to emotional to think straight, relax review and come back later.

as is the (D) as we discussed in a different thread. (also liars) Really? I don't recall the (D)s pushing for photo IDs to prevent voter fraud, in a state where there had not been any cases until now. (R)s push for rules. Top (R) then gets caught and convicted. Hypocrisy at its best. What is wrong with making someone show ID to vote? are you afraid it will cause places like chicago to actually have a fair election? How many cases had there been such that this became a legislative priority of the GOP? Compared, say, to the number of cases of gun homicide in Indiana, which is not a priority of the GOP at all. GOP pushed the law to prevent voter fraud, then a senior one of their own got caught with his pants down, figuratively speaking. Hypocrites. how many times have dead and incarcerated people voted in places like chicago and minn? alot more than the gun case you talk about. what does D or R have anything to do with voter fraud? if there is fraud you prosecute and be done with it.

RWCs certainly hate freedom and personal responsibility, don't they? In some ways I am really happy that the unbelieveable invasion of personal freedom as espoused by the "conservatives" is coming out. The exosue to the invasiveness and hipocracy of their policies should produce a huge backlash against this American Taliban way of thinking and governing. They will be driven from power end put into the shitcan of history as they soundly deserve. RWCs seem to think that Birth Control is 100% and never fails. RWCs concern for children starts at conception and stops at delivery. After that, mother and child are on their own. I don't understand how the disconnect between those values you claim to believe in, and the actual policies supported, does not whack you upside the head and knock some sense into you. You don't believe in personal freedom and minimal government, while supporting heinous and invasive anti-personal freedom laws such as the forcible rape of women. Transvaginal probes forced upon women are RAPE, by the actual definition of the word. It is truly incredible that RWCs would support state sponsored rape. Do you not have mothers and sisters? Why do you hate them so much that you would support their forcible rape? Are you crazy? Hows about RWCs get subject to anal probing to find out why their heads seem to be so far up their asses that they need a proctometrist to put a glass window in their belly button so that they can see? This is a perfect example of hypocrissy on the left. They bitch screem and yell about having government control health care but then the same ones bitch screem and yell when they get what they asked for. I do not support any government involement in any healthcare but to see the left flip faster than a mexican jumping bean on a hot plate is completely hilarious. Wake up people!!! be careful what you ask for, you may just get it.

as is the (D) as we discussed in a different thread. (also liars) Really? I don't recall the (D)s pushing for photo IDs to prevent voter fraud, in a state where there had not been any cases until now. (R)s push for rules. Top (R) then gets caught and convicted. Hypocrisy at its best. What is wrong with making someone show ID to vote? are you afraid it will cause places like chicago to actually have a fair election?

I am getting used to it. The more they do it the less I believe what they are saying, especially on the national level. when ever I hear a sound bite from the left bashing a rep I look up the entire statement and get the meaning of the words spoken not the twisted meaning put in the soundbite. to bad we cannot trust the media to play the entire statement to get the actual meaning anymore.

Shoot the messenger when the message is embarrassing. Yep, I'm turning beet red. I'm so emabarrased. They should have tossed him in jail. Freakin scumbag. Considering that a jury found Charlie White (R) GUILTY on SIX FELONY counts of voter fraud, perjury and theft, I think jail would be quite appropriate. Especially in Indiana, which thanks to its Republican lawmakers, really has the hots for voter fraud. Voter fraud and intimidation should be investigated and those held responsible that do it. The fact that a R or D is in front of the name shouldn't make a difference. seems that there is a lack of investigating when there is a D in front of the name. The (R) is, however, a very good indicator of HYPOCRISY. that attitude that you display is the reason we have the issues we have today. No, Charlie White's attitude is the problem. That he doesn't have to obey the very laws that his party pushes. And you are an apologist for him. It is Charlie White (R) who has been convicted on SIX FELONY counts, not me. I am? were did I apologize for him? If he is guilty he should go to jail if that is the penalty for what he did. The only thing I mentioned was that the R or D should not influence who was investigated. You should stick to putting words in your mouth not others.

Shoot the messenger when the message is embarrassing. Yep, I'm turning beet red. I'm so emabarrased. They should have tossed him in jail. Freakin scumbag. Considering that a jury found Charlie White (R) GUILTY on SIX FELONY counts of voter fraud, perjury and theft, I think jail would be quite appropriate. Especially in Indiana, which thanks to its Republican lawmakers, really has the hots for voter fraud. Voter fraud and intimidation should be investigated and those held responsible that do it. The fact that a R or D is in front of the name shouldn't make a difference. seems that there is a lack of investigating when there is a D in front of the name. The (R) is, however, a very good indicator of HYPOCRISY. that attitude that you display is the reason we have the issues we have today.

Shoot the messenger when the message is embarrassing. Yep, I'm turning beet red. I'm so emabarrased. They should have tossed him in jail. Freakin scumbag. Considering that a jury found Charlie White (R) GUILTY on SIX FELONY counts of voter fraud, perjury and theft, I think jail would be quite appropriate. Especially in Indiana, which thanks to its Republican lawmakers, really has the hots for voter fraud. Voter fraud and intimidation should be investigated and those held responsible that do it. The fact that a R or D is in front of the name shouldn't make a difference. seems that there is a lack of investigating when there is a D in front of the name.