There is no record of this change in the minutes from winter 08, summer 08, winter 09.
That change makes no sense.
How does this relate to the insertion of the word undergraduate in 2.Section 7-1.2A3a ???
What was the issue that came up at the 08 Collegiates?
I know the change doesn't make sense and I didn't see it in the minutes either, but I have both manuals and that was copied directly from them.
This doesn't have anything to do with the insertion of undergraduate, but people were discussing it so I thought I'd try to clear it up. The issue at the '08 collegiates was just that there was a competitor who was 24, had more than 1,000 jumps and more than 5 years in the sport. Some people thought that since he was technically over 24 years old, he was ineligible. After a short discussion they declared that he was eligible.
By the way, thanks for the advice on how to start an interim motion, we will definetely be doing that.