Although the official word given to the reporter was "lack of participation", (I heard this too), I also received word that it is because the club wasn't generating funds, which according to some policies stubstanciates closure. However, I'd like the reporter to go back and ask who ever he interviewed initially whether or not the club handlers were given any options to keep the club open or did the club handlers offer options themselves to keep the club open and if they did, what was the problem?
