-
Content
4,759 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Never -
Feedback
0%
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Dropzones
Gear
Articles
Fatalities
Stolen
Indoor
Help
Downloads
Gallery
Blogs
Store
Videos
Classifieds
Everything posted by Butters
-
... back flying vertical stacks. Get to work!
-
"Evolutionists often falsely accuse creationists of believing in a flat Earth. But neither history nor modern scholarship supports the claim that Christians ever widely believed that the Earth was flat. And the Bible doesn’t teach it." http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v16/i2/flatearth.asp I'm not accusing you of believing the world is flat ... I'm accusing you of believing the majority is right because they're the majority. "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
That is simply not true. I say something is true. You ask why. I say, because that's what the Bible says. A Jehovah's Witness also says something is true. You ask why. He says, because that's what the Bible says. Then, what we need to do is look into a historical context. Now if my interpretation of what the Bible says matches up with what the vast majority of scholarly folks throughout history (who have done all the heavy lifting of translation from the original languages) have come up with, then I have great cause to think that what I am reading is reliable. On the other hand, for example, if the Jehovah's Witness New World Translation (produced by the Watchtower Society) doesn't match up with what anyone else is saying (e.g. with regard to the Trinity, deity of Jesus, etc.), then I have great cause for concern. So when almost everyone thought the world was flat ... you would have thought it was flat and would have had great cause for concern in regards to those who thought otherwise. "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
It's possible that mine could (hopefully, not to a large extent, though) because I'm human and God, throughout the course of my life, is conforming me to His standard (I've got a very long way to go). However, my shortcoming is not the point. The point is that God's standard does not change. And more rubbish ... it changed from the old testament to the new testament. "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
You've shown that your morals are not only subjective but change based on time ... fantastic. "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
He didn't commit adultery with Hagar (Gen 16:3). But Abram had certainly been guilty of breaking the 2nd Commandment and worshiping false gods (Joshua 24:2,3). That's not the point, though. The point is that God established the covenant and God always keeps His promises. It wasn't like a contract that God made with Abram. A covenant is deeper than that. A contract can be broken if one party fails to meet his end of the bargain. Man continually fails to meet up with his side of the bargain. God, on the other hand, will follow through with His promise even if we fail to do so. God "chose" to work through Abram. Not the other way around. The covenant is intact. So God doesn't care about morality ... after all, he made a covenant with an adulterer. "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
Can you explain how Abram would've known about the ten commandments? Can you explain how God wouldn't have known about the ten commandments and Abram's adultery? "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
And more rubbish ... Can you explain why God made a covenant with Abram who committed adultery with Hagar when do not commit adultery is one of the ten commandments? "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
I would derive laws from logic and reasoning. "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
I have a Spectre 150 and had my fastest opening at Flock & Dock. However, everything happened in sequence so it wasn't my hardest opening ... although it was hard enough to make my chin cup come loose and make me wonder what happened. "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
Agreed but if you have to compare the suits from different manufactures then ... Prodigy Intro Phantom T-Bird Ghost R-Bird Vampire S-Bird Venom X-Bird ... the Phantom should be compared to the T-Bird instead of the R-Bird. "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
Prodigy Intro Phantom T-Bird Ghost R-Bird Vampire S-Bird Venom X-Bird "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
Let me know how that goes. I was hoping to play with weights and my FlySight this summer. "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
Join faster flocks ... "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
I also have to thank everyone. Had a blast making 43 flights ... flat, vertical, belly, back, and docking. What more can you ask for? "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
Okay, so do less missions (and save more money) ... "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
I will never grow up! "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
so the obvious question about the prospective government shutdown
Butters replied to SivaGanesha's topic in Speakers Corner
You must have been reading your posts with that comment. After all, my posts are littered with spelling, grammar, and punctuation mistakes. Once again, do you consider launching cruise missiles to be "sabre rattlin"? That's an easy question with an easy answer ... yes or no. "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch -
so the obvious question about the prospective government shutdown
Butters replied to SivaGanesha's topic in Speakers Corner
TSK TSK TSK... There ya go again little fella.... just cain't hep yersef cain ya... And still no answer ... typical. Strokin... as usual And still no answer ... I thought you learned from your mistakes? And still no answer ... Do I need ask the question again but using smaller words? You can ask till hell freezes over BUTTers, but I certainly have no desire to answer any of your silly vituperative questions... not that you have anything better to do but get off on your usual stalkerish nonsensical posts. Face it.. ANYTHING I post.. annoys the fuck out of you.... -
so the obvious question about the prospective government shutdown
Butters replied to SivaGanesha's topic in Speakers Corner
TSK TSK TSK... There ya go again little fella.... just cain't hep yersef cain ya... And still no answer ... typical. Strokin... as usual And still no answer ... I thought you learned from your mistakes? And still no answer ... Do I need ask the question again but using smaller words? "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch -
so the obvious question about the prospective government shutdown
Butters replied to SivaGanesha's topic in Speakers Corner
TSK TSK TSK... There ya go again little fella.... just cain't hep yersef cain ya... And still no answer ... typical. Strokin... as usual And still no answer ... I thought you learned from your mistakes? "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch -
so the obvious question about the prospective government shutdown
Butters replied to SivaGanesha's topic in Speakers Corner
TSK TSK TSK... There ya go again little fella.... just cain't hep yersef cain ya... And still no answer ... typical. "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch -
so the obvious question about the prospective government shutdown
Butters replied to SivaGanesha's topic in Speakers Corner
Decided to run and hide under a bridge instead of answering my question ... typical. "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch -
What State rights in particular? "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
so the obvious question about the prospective government shutdown
Butters replied to SivaGanesha's topic in Speakers Corner
What do you consider all the cruise missile strikes that Clinton and Obama have ordered? PS: Are you blissful? WWWWHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH The sound of you not having a clue.... yet again. Do you consider launching cruise missiles to be "sabre rattlin"? "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch