Butters
-
Content
4,759 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Never -
Feedback
0%
Everything posted by Butters
-
Or they could print 100 copies in English, 0 in Spanish, and 0 in Vietnamese. "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
Why did you buy the Apache instead of the X2? "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
Colorwise there is a point where 'God of the skies' heads more towards 'Queen of the desert' God, Queen, ... whatever, still above a peasant.
-
Does that mean I'm cool? Orange and yellow all the way! "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
You really think there is even a remote chance that The US will one day be under Taliban rule? Nope. Just trying to narrow down where people draw the line between in-debt freedom and debt-free tyranny. And this thread isn't just about America, but also the same topic in Iraq & Afghanistan. Once again, do you think we'll remain a democratic state when the interest on the debt is more than we had, have, or will have? This is a more realistic question than the one you posed ... "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
At what dollar limit do you say; "Screw it, freedom is too expensive, I would prefer to just live under tyranny." State your price. If one is in debt than one is not free ... Would you rather be in-debt in a democratic state, or debt-free living under the Taliban? In debt in a democratic state. Do you think we'll remain a democratic state when the interest on the debt is more than we had, have, or will have? "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
At what dollar limit do you say; "Screw it, freedom is too expensive, I would prefer to just live under tyranny." State your price. If one is in debt than one is not free ... "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
When they move out It is my house "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
I can assure you that I am not into butt plugs. That's obvious given all the s**t you post around here. "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
Bill, I doubt any girl will be dancing on my lap ... no strippers and you've witnessed my game (or lack thereof). "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
This shows your arrogance. Learn English ... implying you don't understand may show arrogance but it doesn't show indignation. No. I honestly believe that your beliefs currently affect me more than my beliefs affect you and believe this should be changed. Believing the fantasies in the Bible were a reality is delusional at best. "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
Given your posting history it's unlikely that you would (or could) understand the difference. I can't think of any reason to continue this discussion. "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
Given your past comments on religion, if you expected a different conclusion to be drawn from your post you're living in a fantasy world. I'm living in a fantasy? I'm not the one who believes the fairy tales told in the Bible ... "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
if we want to choose to use the word "indoctrination" in it's most negative sense then: "indoctrination" is the teaching to children beliefs that are counter to the wishes of their parents (who are responsible for that alone) how's that? any other definition is just - indoctrination is teach people something I don't believe in which sucks as a definition I could go with this But I was not the one who used the word here I find it curious how some anti religion relious nuts are just as passonate in their beliefs but po po the beliefs of others. We "po po" the beliefs of others because we're sick and tired of others beliefs affecting our lives. Where did anyone state that? "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
Hmm So you do think that if someone has been exposed to the information and they chose to become followers they have been failed in teaching process and therfore have been indoctrinated? Am seriously asking Revised my previous post to reflect my thoughts. I think you've failed in the teaching process when you pose one theory as right and the competing theories as wrong instead of teaching the theories as theories and allowing the individual to make their own decision. PS: At what age would you allow your child to deny your religion and refrain from participating in it? "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
Putting forth theories as facts before teaching critical thinking skills is one sign of indoctrination. "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
You don't teach your kids your beliefs and right from wrong and why? How loving is that? There is a difference between teaching and indoctrinating ... "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
It's not up to my kid's school, me, or anyone else but God to establish faith and belief in my children. It is my job, in which the school is a partner, to present them with what we believe to be true and to culture an environment to that end. However, they could in fact decide for themselves to reject the faith. I hope not and i think it's much less likely given that they've been brought up with the benefits of being part of a covenant family...but it is possible. In other words, we hope not because we've done as much as we can do to indoctrinate them with our beliefs ... "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
Meeting the 200 jumps in 18 months timeline?
Butters replied to slackercruster's topic in Wing Suit Flying
Wow, I remember when you just packed! Those numbers make me realize I need to jump more ... much, much more. "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch -
I appreciate your sarcasm. However, I wonder why you directed it at me instead of Amazon ... "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
Prove your hero's have not used the Patriot act for anything other than the search for Islamo-Fascists.. You will find it is impossible.. Do you know why everyone would find it impossible? Go find links proving that your hero's administration.. complied with the laws of our country in respect to our constitution and their use of the FISA court. How about you go find links proving the current administration isn't doing the same thing your accusing the past administration of doing ... I'm waiting. "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
Prove your hero's have not used the Patriot act for anything other than the search for Islamo-Fascists.. You will find it is impossible.. Do you know why everyone would find it impossible? Go find links proving that your hero's administration.. complied with the laws of our country in respect to our constitution and their use of the FISA court. My hero's administration? More like your hero's administration. After all, between the two of us you're the only one whose voted for that party before. As far as the rest, go find it yourself ... "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
Prove your hero's have not used the Patriot act for anything other than the search for Islamo-Fascists.. You will find it is impossible.. Do you know why everyone would find it impossible? "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
I know you like the movie V for Vendetta but we're talking about reality ... not fantasy. "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch
-
I must have missed where he said "and you better believe it too" - can you point it out for me, or were you just projecting? I'm using past and present posts to connect the dots. Feel free to show the posts where he has advocated forcing people to worship in the Christian faith. Feel free to show the posts where he has advocated allowing people to worship in non-Christian faiths or allowing people to not worship at all. "That looks dangerous." Leopold Stotch