BoilingMidnight

Can you explain how these vital millions of illegal aliens could be employed while simultaneously being "ignored by white Americans"? "Iþ ik qiþa izwis, ni andstandan allis þamma unseljin."

Sounds scary. I hope you didn't leave any states out. But can you please post your evidence supporting that claim? "Iþ ik qiþa izwis, ni andstandan allis þamma unseljin."

How do you deal with the other folks who jump and have English as a second language? But I'm curious, how does he make a living in this country, indeed enough to afford the thousands of dollars needed to participate in such an expensive sport, without knowing a word of English? "Iþ ik qiþa izwis, ni andstandan allis þamma unseljin."

Did you feel the speed increase typical of a downplane, or did you chop before it fully evolved into one? And if so, how did you "know" it was turning into one? "Iþ ik qiþa izwis, ni andstandan allis þamma unseljin."

I'd recommend you make sure to include experienced skydivers in your sample. D-license holders with 1000's of jumps have attitudes very different from novices. "Iþ ik qiþa izwis, ni andstandan allis þamma unseljin."

I agree with jee. "Iþ ik qiþa izwis, ni andstandan allis þamma unseljin."

I've only had excellent experiences with Aerodyne. I would go out of my way to do business with them again. "Iþ ik qiþa izwis, ni andstandan allis þamma unseljin."

Just curious: Did your training cover this area? "Iþ ik qiþa izwis, ni andstandan allis þamma unseljin."

Well that's super! I'm glad they were able to afford the indulgence of extreme socialism financed by 57% tax rates (yes, that's the real bottom rate) while someone else was paying with dollars and blood to defend their borders. In fact, they're very much aware of this (i.e., why they're speaking Danish today instead of German or Russian.) They're the only country outside the U.S. to celebrate America's Independence Day every July 4. The festival is attended by the Danish monarch and other members of the royal family. Tak, Danmark! "Iþ ik qiþa izwis, ni andstandan allis þamma unseljin."

Perhaps one of those countries held that title a few hundred years ago, but the other never did. "Iþ ik qiþa izwis, ni andstandan allis þamma unseljin."

If you can’t debate the merits of your argument, call into question the character of your opponent. "Iþ ik qiþa izwis, ni andstandan allis þamma unseljin."

I fear you were looking in a mirror when making that statement, for nothing in my post was inaccurate. In fact, you supported it. As did the much-vaunted "WHO." Without needing to resort to bolding to make my point, I repeat: "The study, not widely publicized, concluded that no statistically significant risk existed for nonsmokers who either lived or worked with smokers." A very educated man reiterated that "neither increased risk was statistically significant." Oh wait, was that you? "Iþ ik qiþa izwis, ni andstandan allis þamma unseljin."

If you can’t debate the merits of your argument, call into question the character of your opponent. Thanks for the victory, friend. "Iþ ik qiþa izwis, ni andstandan allis þamma unseljin."

Gosh, I'm confused. Are you speaking of Chuck Shumer (D) who made speeches and voted for the war ? Or was it John Kerry (D), who voted for it (before he voted against it). Or was it Teddy Kennedy, who rallied liberals in the Senate against Hussein and voted for war. They all voted for WAR (eek!) based upon the same intelligence Bush saw. But no. Perhaps you're speaking of Hillary Clinton who said we have a responsibility to disarm Iraq. Yes, she must be the one you mean, for she voted for war after seeing the intelligence provided by the British intelligence agencies. Oh, and the French. And the German. And the Russian. Boy, did that woman pull one over on us just for her oil buddies. I guess that's why she's never voted to defund the war and said she'd never pull out American troops before 2013. For that matter, so did trial lawyer what's-his-name and Barack Hussein Obama. Well I guess we can count on your vote for President Rudy Giuliani. Welcome aboard. P.S. I know you academics love research, so here are a few factoids you may have missed: "If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program." - President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998 "Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." - Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998 "We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country." - Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002 "We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." - Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002 "I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." - Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002 "In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." - Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002 "Iþ ik qiþa izwis, ni andstandan allis þamma unseljin."

Agree 100%. Tort reform is one of the few — the very few — things Europe does better than the States. It'd make frivolous plaintiffs think thrice before suing over spilled coffee and drive ambulance chasers right into bankruptcy. But with a majority of politicians holding law degrees, it's an uphill battle against the Trial Lawyers lobby. P.S. I read a survey stating that of all occupations, lawyering garners the lowest trust amongst others. Interestingly pharmacists ranked first. "Iþ ik qiþa izwis, ni andstandan allis þamma unseljin."

Um...your home page lists your main canopy as a Spectre. "Iþ ik qiþa izwis, ni andstandan allis þamma unseljin."

The Pilot is semi-elliptical. "Iþ ik qiþa izwis, ni andstandan allis þamma unseljin."

In 1998, the World Health Organization's International Agency for Research on Cancer released the largest ever and best formulated study on ETS. The research project ran for 10 years and in seven European countries. The study, not widely publicized, concluded that no statistically significant risk existed for nonsmokers who either lived or worked with smokers. "Iþ ik qiþa izwis, ni andstandan allis þamma unseljin."

Interesting how the same individuals who label patriotic traditions as “hangups” will call terrorists “freedom fighters” and say it’s politically correct. That’s called rationalization, and no supposing is needed to see logic doesn't enter into that. "Iþ ik qiþa izwis, ni andstandan allis þamma unseljin."

No less brotherly than your own pointed question. But now that we know "statistics do not matter", all forms of health, life and car insurance can be eliminated, along with every safety qualification. Thank you sir. I will inform the pääministeri. "Iþ ik qiþa izwis, ni andstandan allis þamma unseljin."

Is that your way of feeling superiour by greeting a new skydiver's innocent question with a veiled insult? Just curious... "Iþ ik qiþa izwis, ni andstandan allis þamma unseljin."

Madam I hope you can understand my reluctance to do so considering your moderator called Christianity a religion of cannibalism and torture: http://www.dropzone.com/...ost=2791710;#2791710 Very brave to attack a religion based upon peace and forgiveness. Try your hand at libeling the muslums and let’s see your mettle… "Iþ ik qiþa izwis, ni andstandan allis þamma unseljin."

Um...calling attention to an infraction does not equal an infraction. You do understand that, right? Refusing to differentiate between perpetrator and victim is a Cindy Sheehan talking point. Are the police criminals? Is "one's man's terrorist is another's freedom fighter"? "Iþ ik qiþa izwis, ni andstandan allis þamma unseljin."

Case and point. Roll on, bigots. "Iþ ik qiþa izwis, ni andstandan allis þamma unseljin."

Actually the tactic most used on this forum appears to be schoolyard name-calling and vulgarities, cratered with misspellings and bad grammar. And some of it is quite foul… One fellow saw fit to call me a "fucking idiot", apparently without repercussion: http://www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=2794539;#2794539 He's still posting. And another viciously attacked Christianity by calling it a religion of cannibalism and torture: http://www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=2791710;#2791710 Apparently vulgar name-calling is tolerated if it tows the Far-Left party line. This is the core of the Democratic Party's self-loathing band of left-wingers: anti-American, anti-military, anti-Christian, anti-God (unless it's allah), and anti-death penalty (unless it's a helpless baby.) Still it's nice to keep them around for a chuckle and to remind us where the cliff edge is. More importantly the camouflage is gone; the pretense is gone. The mask that liberals lurk behind — that you’re the nice ones, the tolerant ones, the compassionate ones — is gone. Forever. It’s all here for one and all to see, from the anti-Christian bigots, to the traitorous radicals, to the expletive-hurling ranters. It's eminently clear this is the sort of romper room you have here. No wonder this forum's held in such high esteem. "Iþ ik qiþa izwis, ni andstandan allis þamma unseljin."