Lucky...

Just because I own that opinion doesn't mean the DNC does. We will lose seats, it's almost an automatic. You gotta be joking me, this isn't even as reliable as a RW rag, this is a guy with a site and his biased BS and you find it noteworthy???? …I am a thirty something radiologist and entrepreneur, living in the Central Ohio. I am married with two children. I consider myself a conservative, though I am moderate (or Libertarian) on many inssues. I think I am more a pragmatist that an idealogue, but certainly I can sometimes be idealistic. What a joke. Why do I waste my time discussing grown up issues with a person who references fringe BS and considers them mainstream? As time has gone fwd GWB has fallen: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_rankings_of_Presidents_of_the_United_States

Glen Beck is a Mormon. He's also a moron. I don't know anybody who would consider him "the de-facto Christian Spritual leader of the USA." Not that it makes much difference to me. I didn't write that. Not that I disagree with it, but you replied to teh wrong person.

It's called nationalism. So you believe in a God, still Chrit-based, you have just denounced organized religion??? Christianity is a farse to me, organized or not. It's used to bring people togetehr, which is good, it's alos used to exploit money, sex or other things from people too, so It's also bad. All in all, it is possible for organisms to mutate and deviate over 4 billion years. Why do we have a tail bone? Were we about to grow a tail or was it receeding? All kinds of vestigial organs on us and most species indicates that orgs do change their physiology.

Contemporarily it defines Reagan, a Dem who crossed to R. But it has roots to the 1920's when the R's lost their way, that is when they went from teh best party to the worst. Teddy Roosevelt was teh last great Repub of that era, since we've had Eisenhower and even GHWB was good. Everyone else crap.

Don't worry. The Republicans still hold the record for threatened filibusters. The Dems will never even come close. Just like Earmarks DOH! "Despite pledges from President Obama and congressional leaders to curtail earmark spending, the practice has continued at previous levels. " From the 2010 Pig Book: Dems: 5070 record(s) for a total of $5,048,602,943 Reps: 2207 record(s) for a total of $2,639,932,600 You were saying? It would be too much to ask for a citation I'm sure, it would take honesty to post that.

Which is why nobody answers you anymore. I've voted for both parties and an indep, you, well, pure ideolouge RW style. Great point, Mikeepoo.

yes. Lucky doesn't get that the 40-60s had limitations on debt issuance that doesn't exist now (Gold Standard), as well as a Social Security that wasn't subsidizing the deficit the tune of 9 figures each year. Einstein, the US abandond the Gold Standard in 1933 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gold_standard and once again Lucky screws the pooch. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nixon_Shock Keep the the optimism for 2012. You sound like a Cub fan say "wait till next year." Except that the baseball season is still in May. Since you're gonna deny your ass off and never admit error, here is a better explanation: http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/L-gold.htm After the Great Depression struck, the world wasted little time severing its ties to gold. Britain left the gold standard in 1931, as did the U.S. in 1933. By 1937, not a single country remained on the gold standard. After World War II, the U.S. partially restored the gold standard for international trade. And to prevent citizens from bank panics, it made its currency inconvertible at home. In 1971, a diminishing gold supply and growing deficits caused the U.S. to suspend the gold standard even for international trade. Ever since, international trade has been based solely on the dollar and other paper currencies. Today, there are no mainstream economists who call for a return to the gold standard; it is widely regarded as a fringe idea of the radical right. So there it is, a partial international gold standard was instituted, not a true gold standard as you claim. As for the article's, "fringe right" they're referring to you and yours I assume.

yes. Lucky doesn't get that the 40-60s had limitations on debt issuance that doesn't exist now (Gold Standard), as well as a Social Security that wasn't subsidizing the deficit the tune of 9 figures each year. Einstein, the US abandond the Gold Standard in 1933 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gold_standard and once again Lucky screws the pooch. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nixon_Shock Keep the the optimism for 2012. You sound like a Cub fan say "wait till next year." Except that the baseball season is still in May. You're still wrong, and you are the pooch in this case. http://economics.about.com/cs/money/a/gold_standard.htm A Very Brief History of the Gold Standard If you would like to learn about the history of money in detail, there is an excellent site called A Comparative Chronology of Money which details the important places and dates in monetary history. During most of the 1800s the United States was had a bimetallic system of money, however it was essentially on a gold standard as very little silver was traded. A true gold standard came to fruition in 1900 with the passage of the Gold Standard Act. The gold standard effectively came to an end in 1933 when President Franklin D. Roosevelt outlawed private gold ownership (except for the purposes of jewelery). The Bretton Woods System, enacted in 1946 created a system of fixed exchange rates that allowed governments to sell their gold to the United States treasury at the price of $35/ounce. "The Bretton Woods system ended on August 15, 1971, when President Richard Nixon ended trading of gold at the fixed price of $35/ounce. At that point for the first time in history, formal links between the major world currencies and real commodities were severed". The gold standard has not been used in any major economy since that time. The real gold standard was ended in 1933, the Bretton Woods systemn was just a way for other countries to sell gold to the US gov for $35/ounce, not a real standard.

YAY, coattaling Belgianhttp://images.paraorkut.com/img/funnypics/images/g/gay_cheerleader-12791.jpg YAY go Belgian

all I said is that 6061 is the typical alloy, has the best weldability In typical Belgian fashion, no addition of what aluminum alloy is. I can't think of one primary structure airframe part that is welded Uh yea, I'm talking aluminum alloy, not 4130 steel, my dad woked on a cub for a while, never finished it. Of course 4130 tubalur steel is welded, we were talking aluminum, einstein. Whatevr you do, don't act as tho you have a clue and list them. See, with welding aluminum, there is the risk of changing hardening characteristics IOW's, I'm right. If it is welded, they then have to Xray it if it is primary, that's why it is advantageous to just machine it, fasten it, etc, You're the one who's non-responsive here, fill in your blanks above where you claimed to knwo but didn't finish.

More generaliztions from the guy w/o any suppoting data. Here I thought Republicans were alittle more closeted about their conservatism: http://www.newswithviews.com/Stang/alan1.htm Now that Minneapolis cops have finally nailed Idaho Senator Larry Craig, let it be said that his proclivity is stale news. Craig has routinely been accused of sodomy for at least twenty five years. In fact, Craig’s reputation as a predatory sodomite is so well-established and redundant that I did not bother mentioning him in my new book, Not Holier Than Thou, about the homosexual takeover of the Republicrud Party. Neo, when hyphenated means, "new." That was the context in which I used it, more abstraction from that side. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/NEO Come on neo-con, show us yours: http://images.paraorkut.com/img/funnypics/images/g/gay_cheerleader-12791.jpg

Naw, when the kids come out in 2012 we will have seats back that are lost in 2010 along with retention of the WH. Probably a seat or two in SCOTUS as well.

Whatever you do, don't actually address an issue. I feel safe with that.

Don't worry. The Republicans still hold the record for threatened filibusters. The Dems will never even come close. Just like Earmarks DOH! And that's from their fringe site too. Reconcilliation by party: We find that there have been 22 reconciliation votes, 14 of them by a Republican-controlled Congress, and that it makes more sense -- in light of the debate over making an end-run around the 60-vote threshold -- to focus on the reconciliation bills that passed without a supermajority. But even then, Republicans have reached for reconciliation bills more often than Democrats since 1981. We rule Reid's comment True. http://politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2010/feb/25/harry-reid/reid-says-repblicans-have-used-reconciliation-more/

yes. Lucky doesn't get that the 40-60s had limitations on debt issuance that doesn't exist now (Gold Standard), as well as a Social Security that wasn't subsidizing the deficit the tune of 9 figures each year. Einstein, the US abandond the Gold Standard in 1933 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gold_standard And with high taxes, debt wsn't an issue in teh 40's to the 60's, it only became an issue when taxes were lowered. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:MarginalIncomeTax.svg So the 40's 60's are the years when taxes have been the highest in the US ever, so you've made my argument once again. High taxes, no debt problems, plenty of money for nuclear buildup, Korean War, Cold War, etc. You really have just reinforced my argument that high taxes fix things and still allow for massive spending. Now I would like high taxes and limited military spending so we could pay down the debt.

I know you're not big on history, or math apparently, but the newly elected pres has only added seats twice in the last I believe 100 years in his first midterm, GWB and FDR. So it is history which makes it a given, not otehr things. Well at least we can put to rest the question of you being a racist or not. As for inexperienced, 10 years as a law const teacher, pres of the Harvard law review, US Senator, etc. Yea, that's nothing at all, esp compared to the garabge you vote for: - Reagan: war coward, governor, bad actor - GWB: war coward, deserter, moron that fucked up every business he encountered Right, to elect a WASP maggot who wants to revoke whatever college beenfits they might have and send them to war. Nice try.

Here, I'll post it: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:MarginalIncomeTax.svg Explain how our best years were under extremely high taxation and worst under extremely low taxation, like now. This is not a fad, a brief change, this is 100 years of history and teh fact that yes, as you say, there are other variables as with higer spending, lower spending, higher taxation, lower taxation this creates the best environment for determining the dependent variable. If we had sameness over this 100-year set of samples, it could be impossible to really find the D.V. Look at contemporary times, realtively higehr taxes as with Clinton led to the best economic growth ever for us, lower taxes on either side of it were amongst our worst. I understand you're a bit of Libertarian; fiscally conservative and socially liberal, which is why you don't want to discuss the tax issue. Most people are lifetime ideologues, I'm used to dealing with it. Remember, if you can't explain something and refuse to try, you might just be wrong. Oh brother, whatever. That sounds like you know what, but I'm not here to discuss spelling, grammar, punctuation, etc. Wendy, show me a major federal tax cut, just one for starters that has led to overall better economic times. Go 100 years if you wish, I find it more relevant to go post WWII as pre doesn't really reflect a fair comparison to the 65 years past WWII therefore is contemporarily irrelevant. So show me one and we can go from there. I've seen you lay good args, what's the problem here?

Taxation, collecting receipts and outlays, spending are seperate animals. With all that, show a time when cutting taxation regardless of spending, has been beneficial.

That's a major diff, libs don't backslap, cheerlead, we often disagree; strange to you, huh?

I don't care if people enhance their position with sarcasm, but fuck dude (skipbelt) making a fucking case and quit coattailing those who can't even make a case for themselves.

Yea I say suppression is the best from the party of so-called non-sensorship.

So where's the problem? They told and allowed you to have her opt out; don;t see the cheese, just hear the whine. If I had a kid and some neo-fascist corporate pig Republican was going to be televised or appear, I would let my kid go if they wanted. See, libs want all perspectives experienced, that's a big diff between libs and neo-conservs.

LMAO LMAO http://images.paraorkut.com/img/funnypics/images/g/gay_cheerleader-12791.jpg Go Turtle go....LMAO

Says the trailer guy who has yet to establish his so-called credibility on the subject, just, "Oh, trust me, I have it." I don't know welding, all I said is that 6061 is the typical alloy, has the best weldability. NEWSFLASH: Few acft airframe parts are welded, most are riverted, skins are chem milled or bonded, then riveted on. I can't think of one primary structure airframe part that is welded. See, with welding aluminum, there is the risk of changing hardening characteristics, so everything is riveted, Huck bolted, Hi-loked, taper locked, etc. Let me ask this, where can you and can you not use cherrymax rivets. You have never shown where I have stated somethinbg wrong in accorance with the law and how it works, just rhetoric. If you are an engineer, doubtful based on your non-responses, but if you are then you know you mist provide stress anaalysis, that's the most arduous paart of your job so I understand. That is empirical proof that a structure or devise should sustain the stresses imposed upon it. Same goes here, you have yet to prove up your claims on any front. What do you find subjective about BLS, BEA, market data? The data is objective, you can say my interpretation is subjective but that isn;t addressing the data, that's running Beligian-style. ADDRESS THE DATA AND QUIT RUNNING.

this one's true , unless it's a generalisation ! -spelling yank- ! My humbleist appolgies mein furrier. But if you understood what I meant, then communicaion has occured. can i appeal to your erstwhile sense of humor ? and did you mean fuhrer ? i'm overlooking humblest in fun ! -spelling yank - Whooooosh! http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Take%20it%20or%20leave%20it%2C%20mein%20furrier