SkyDekker
-
Content
21,691 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
96 -
Feedback
0% -
Country
Canada
Everything posted by SkyDekker
-
Sure. The government slashed corporate obligations. The money that was freed up by not having to pay taxes was used in large part to buy back stocks, while dim-witted Republicans touted the "benefits" of trickle-down economics. Those taxes would have served society better providing child care and education, if only so there would be less dim-witted Republicans who believe in trickle-down economics.
-
Or very poorly communicated to begin with. The problem could be on your side.
-
As opposed to free money to buy up stock prices? Free child care and free college would probably bring considerably more benefit to society than a few multi-million bonus payouts.
-
Nothing muddled about that. Nobody argues that being over-fed is good.
-
Ah yes, the "if you were as smart as I am, you would understand" argument. I have said it before, and I am sure I will say it again, but you don't want argument and discussion. You want people to agree with you.
-
Aren't you trying to 'educate' everyone here on how evil woke ideology is?
-
Thank you for providing this fine example of a strawman argument.
-
Post trump Legal Actions, Including his Enablers
SkyDekker replied to Phil1111's topic in Speakers Corner
I just see a very clear indication that Republicans are solely interested in amassing power and have very little interest in doing anything for the good of the US. It is no mistake Trump has found such kinship in the GOP, since their overarching life question is the same: "What is in it for me?". -
Right, he made a broad statement about his dislike with laypeople saying they do research, cause as a scientist research has a very specific meaning. In other words, he was generalizing about how he dislikes people not being specific and thorough. I enjoyed the irony.
-
Why? I doubt a chef gets upset when a non-chef says they've prepared a nice dinner. I am not a scientist, but I can still do my own research. Which would include finding out what the research done by scientists has shown.
-
See, you and I can agree on things.
-
It has taken more than 60 years to get from 4% approval to 94% approval....more than 60 years. Goes to show that for some of these things to change, you do need a generation to pass.
-
Honestly, I thought it had to be fake when I first saw it. Turns out Trump really can sink that low.
-
Trump's Statement on the passing of Colin Powel. https://twitter.com/josh_wingrove/status/1450456138869313550?s=20
-
Good to see you have been reduced to the equivalent of a meme.
-
This whole post can be summed up by one word: Darwin.
-
Trump, Trump will be the republican ticket for President and Vice President. And they will be elected.
-
Not entirely true. Some of the big banks, health industries, utilities and other large companies announced vaccine mandates prior to provincial and federal mandates.
-
That is 2 to 3 per million. On the high end that accounts for about 855 people of the vaccine eligible population in the US. Odds are when you speak to somebody who isn't vaccinated, it has nothing to do with allergies.
-
No I didn't. No. I doubt you have enough money to pay a doctor to tell you everything about medicine you don't know.
-
I highly doubt you have enough money to accomplish that task.
-
Sure. That many words in a row is quite a daunting task.
-
Here is a really weird concept. Maybe try thinking for yourself instead of doing what you are told?
-
You didn't read the article, did you
-
If actual freedom is cops driving around in unmarked vans shooting at anybody standing around I will take living without actual freedom. If when you return fire in self defense, you are then beaten, kicked in the face and arrested. I will take living without that actual freedom. If you are then offered a plea deal of 13 years by the prosecutor and have to take your chances in court. I will take living without that actual freedom. But you still didn't answer the important question. As a good proud American Republican, are you supposed to support the fine officers in the article, or the fine veteran who they beat and then tried to put in jail for a long period of time?
