jakee

If you trust any part of that articles assessment of what is or is not legal then you're more gullible than even I thought. Do you want to have an ideagasm?

So why did NC Republicans waste so much time and effort forcing through a bill to deal with a non-problem? Do you want to have an ideagasm?

That's my preferred way of figuring out new cycling routes - mapping out the route and then checking what the junctions look like with streetview and trying to remember them. Of course, if I miss one and get lost on the bike it's usually just a bonus because I'll end up finding new roads and hills I didn't know existed Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Probably. I think they were also hoping that they could make it seem that an invasion would be bloody enough that they could persuade the US to agree to favourable terms in the surrender instead (as Bill said above - keep the Emperor, no occupation). After the bombs, unconditional surrender. Do you want to have an ideagasm?

What the citizens were told was going to happen and what was going to happen would be two different things. The Japanese high command may have been nationalist fanatics but they weren't completely blind to reality. Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Nope, that's not the best thing about rural english signposts, the best thing is that the names of villages referenced will randomly change at every junction. So say you're trying to get to Fiddleford and you know that Stock Gaylard is in the same direction you can follow signposts that say either Fiddleford or Stock Gaylard. But then at some junctions neither Fiddleford nor Stock Gaylard will be signposted and it'll say Fifehead Neville instead. Which is also in the same direction but unless you know that you're screwed. (And yes, all those names are real) Another good one is in Italy, where roads leading onto the Autostrada are only posted 'Autostrada', and other road signs with major destinations on are actually taking you on B-road cross country odysseys. So if you want to get to Brescia quickly, you ignore the sign that says 'Brescia,' leave the road that is supposedly taking you there and go in the opposite direction with the sign that says 'Autostrada' - then when you're on the Autostrada you figure out which way Brescia actually is. Do you want to have an ideagasm?

The thing you said originally. I'm sorry, was I too subtle in pointing that out over the last few posts? You could try explaining why you think your post wasn't stupid, or why presenting your non-sequitur response as an on-topic answer wasn't dishonest. That would be a basis for a discussion. Your continued avoidance of the subject only demonstrates that you don't have an explanation for either. So again I kind of ask why you're even bothering to reply if that is the case. Are you suggesting that your claims of being my unworthy intellectual inferior are serious? Do you want to have an ideagasm?

I'd ask the same thing I just did, which is if you're still determined to avoid discussing the subject, at least do so with some new jokes. The second question would be if you don't want to talk about it, and you can't think of any other clever retorts, why are you replying at all? Somewhat strange behaviour, no? Do you want to have an ideagasm?

If there was a Nobel Prize for being wonderful and brilliant, I'm sure you would be nominated. If you're going to keep avoiding the issue with jokes can you at least find a new joke? It was ok the first time round but repeating it every post doesn't make it funnier. Again, any chance you might either defend your statement or admit how stupid it was, or talk about it at all? Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Indifference? No, I think it's pretty clear this isn't a subject you're indifferent about. It's the dishonesty that's the problem. Why all this dancing around to avoid addressing what you originally said? Either stand behind it or admit it was stupid. All this other handwaving and distractions is just silly. How can I ever live up to your standards of honesty, integrity and intellectual acuity? It's pretty easy really. There's no trick to it. You just stop with the childish distractions and explain why you think your original comment was justified. I'm surprised you're having trouble with that concept. Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Indifference? No, I think it's pretty clear this isn't a subject you're indifferent about. It's the dishonesty that's the problem. Why all this dancing around to avoid addressing what you originally said? Either stand behind it or admit it was stupid. All this other handwaving and distractions is just silly. Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Of course not. Again, that's just an incredibly stupid thing to say. Not as stupid as saying people would approve of human trafficking if it was done by a muslim, but pretty close. Stop talking nonsense and I'll stop disagreeing. Your fate is in your own hands. I guess you're right. The fact that rape is halal, and that the slave trade is a long and proud Muslim tradition is incredibly stupid. That I should besmirch an entire population based on nothing more than clearly stated tenets of their faith is inexcusable. You, sir, have put me in my place. None of that has anything to do with your original post, or why it was so stupid. You've either already forgotten what your argument was or you're pretending it was something different and hoping I wouldn't notice. Either way, yeah it's pretty inexcusable. Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Of course not. Again, that's just an incredibly stupid thing to say. Not as stupid as saying people would approve of human trafficking if it was done by a muslim, but pretty close. Stop talking nonsense and I'll stop disagreeing. Your fate is in your own hands. Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Yeah, I am kewl - but that doesn't really have anything to do with the discussion. You'd be better served spending your time thinking about the crapness of your statement instead of the awesomeness of me. I know that's hard, but it'll pay off in the long run. Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Sure, but what does that have to do with me? What am I dismissing? Do you want to have an ideagasm?

You're going to have to try that again, I really don't know what you mean. Do you want to have an ideagasm?

LOL moron Now you've gone and hurt my feelings. You have tumbled to the fact that your approval is what I live for. I want to be just like you when I grow up. You're so smart. It's odd - since the things you say on other subjects clearly show you do have the ability to think and reason, I thought you said dumbass shit like the above because you were trolling for a reaction - kinda like Ron does with every subject you've decided to do it with this one. But maybe you really do think that people would defend this guy's criminal behaviour if he was an imam instead of a minister, despite the ludicrous absurdity of the idea. Either way, you do kinda need to just grow up. Do you want to have an ideagasm?

LOL moron Do you want to have an ideagasm?

I think Adams probably borrowed that concept from Arthur C Clarke's Imperial Earth... and put it to use in a very different way! Do you want to have an ideagasm?

I think their job was to investigate. You appear to be saying that the judicial system of the USA is rotten and corrupt from the top down. Except, somehow, when it gets to your level. Then everything's A-OK. They found plenty else. But you don't like that. Except the dude wasn't prosecuted - so by your yardstick the DOJ are apparently basing their prosecutions on evidence, not politics. Do you want to have an ideagasm?

News outlets refer to Michael Brown in the context of police misconduct on a regular basis, And what do they say when they refer to it? Who is still referring to it and repeating the 'hands up don't shoot' mantra, which is what you just said? Bull-fucking-shit. Every accusation you level at every other poster of anti-cop bias comes back at you double on this one. You are seriously biased against the people who police you. Yeah, you've addressed it by saying you think all their findings of institutional racism were made up. Basically, an outright lie. Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Well it makes sense, they only let in people who agree with their crazy theories - and that's totally ok. It.s their organisation, they can do whatever they want. Of course, that still leaves the 63,800 pediatricians who don't agree with them... Do you want to have an ideagasm?

That's a mash of conflicting nonsense. A cop becoming the start of a new viral video has nothing whatsoever to do with their administration or political leadership. Do you want to have an ideagasm?

"It must work therefore it does work, and don't tell me otherwise!" This is a well known phenomenon. It's taken down 2 space shuttles. Do you want to have an ideagasm?

That's just Super! Do you want to have an ideagasm?