cvfd1399

"Ooh I never do that, you can check my posts from years back. " Gets shown a post where she did it three days ago. "Well that's different it's because you were having a meltdown." -Amazon Edit: Then changes subject.

LMFAO! I had to go back a whole TWO pages to find your broad brush stroke...Where I challenged you on the use of it....And your absence of a reply to correct yourself. http://www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=4767178#4767178 Amazon- Me- And no reply to correct yourself.. So there is your proof. I will kindly accept an apology and your correction now. As for you Normiss you tack your sassy comment on to a post that is incorrect is only hurting your image tarnished from the other thread.

The hero they need.

Even your comeback pours salt in the wound you self inflicted..... You just dont get it.

Great you finally admit it is not all cops who are bad, now do you have a figure in the percentage of bad cops out there to good cop ratio? Or are you going to now go back to painting with your broad brush.

The difference in the two entire situations. The flaw in him using president Obama as a "CEO" with his employees consisting of the federal government and Trump as a CEO with private employees in businesses he started or bought and grew is so painfully obvious I am embarrassed to have to have to tell you.

That is two different things and you know it.

I wonder how much it was that, AND/or the imposed cost. I know here it would have added 1.7 billion eventually to Louisiana tax payers. Can we scrap this and go single payer already.

I wonder what kind of "bomb" it was.

It matches up pretty well with this map of states that did not enact medicaid expansion. http://familiesusa.org/product/50-state-look-medicaid-expansion

He stated he would have been better putting an inheritance in a savings account. A simple google of savings account historical rates and a calculator would have told you that you are wrong, but here take it from someone else if you must. http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/2015/09/03/donald_trump_s_wealth_he_isn_t_only_rich_because_of_his_dad.html Im not in that line of work but I sure as hell can understand that he beat what a "savings account" rate would have given him if he had just put it in there. Not as good as others but still good. And if you doubt the article the guy starts and ends with "I cant believe I am about to defend donald trumps business skills", and "I feel the need for a shower". Thanks for playing the game where everyone looses because you want to argue.

Sorry I figured most would obviously see that the cost is pretty even across the board(I asuume that it already includes shipping) and its the taxes that make up most of the world difference. It wasnt for or against anything anyone here has said, just an interesting graphic about taxes on fuel.

Not at today's or anything in the last 15 years savings rate. He'll maybe not even the past 20 years rate.

Interesting

There was a poster here recently bashing the GOP for their actions during the debate. Good to see their guy acting an ass doing the same thing too. Although it wasn't the first time as I had to show her.

It was a hint for those here who doubt me to get off your lazy asses and search for the studies. They are out there and prove that students are more violent towards each other and the teachers with a pronounced disregard for authority compared to the past. If you can't understand that then Ooh well disregard my posts I don't have time for your obtuseness.

Some people are just can't handle the truth and want to twist it into something nefarious and conspiratorial . In this case it is a cheap way to save persons from injury or death be it man made or mother earth.

With the invention of the internet and published studies it is easier to find the results which indicate what I am saying is true.

Ya, and then there's Trump who doesn't seem to be particularly religious, nor homophobic...so what does that tell ya? Being "stupid" has become desirable. How often do we hear: "I don't agree with him, but at least he says exactly what he thinks". Now people vote for politicians whom they don't agree with, but say stupid things in public. I am sure that is a wonderful recipe to get a strong government. Would you rather a truthful dumbass or a deceitful liar?

Ok does anyone care to share their answer for this too?

You dont post in here often so your bias towards posters should be pretty even keel and you seem to be in the know so I will pose this question to you. We know the climate is changing. We know that the earths climate has changed in the past. We know that it has been hotter, colder, wetter, dryer in the past. We know that man via deforestation, emissions, etc can change the earth on land and in the air. Knowing all that would you say that this global warming, weather change, whatever you want to call it today is. 1. Normal changing weather patterns as shown in history no man made input affecting it at all. 2. Normal changing weather patterns with a slight bit of man made input helping the change. The change is natural but man because he has been measured to have altered it some he is getting all the wrap for it and in fact its just a normal weather change behind all the politics. 3. All man made changes with a bit of normal global weather change as recorded in scientific ice and dirt samples. Man is the cause mother nature is just adding to it. 4. Man is the entire cause, and the normal earth patterns have not changed a bit. Man is entirely at fault. This is not a setup for another question, and not some sort of trap. I seriously wonder what the actual answer is. I will leave out what I think the answer is out of the above till later.

So it's ok for hillary to defend a rapist that she knew did it because it's her job to do so, but as a prosecutor it's not ok for him to do his job and get a conviction by avoiding the selection of people statistically not likely to convict......?

That is a broad statement, care to be realistic and admit that you did not mean all of the police, and only that some are corrupted. Will do....

Your right the patriot act has nothing to do with the South Carolina law "SECTION 12. Section 16-17-420 Disturbing schools". It also has nothing to fucking do with this incident or this thread. Exercising what the military taught you again huh attack the threat when communicating. Your still ignoring the fact that the kids under officer Fields watch are in a majority agreement of support for him. They out of ANYONE being the ones in contact with him for good or bad on a daily basis have a better situation to judge him and the results are not what you are spewing so violently through your keyboard thousands of miles from him with only filtered biased knowledge of but is in support of.

When the water levels are too low for the drive of an outboard but not too high for a lifted vehicle to go in. I was the leader of a search and rescue dive team for 10 years we had an 8 ft zodiac with a 20 Yamaha short shaft and even in high water drive mode it would occasionally chip the blades on pavement in situations like this. The 15' flat bottom with the 25 was worse. The best thing we had around was an old Duce and a half surplus truck. It could take on a lot of water in those situations. If it was lower you walk if it was higher you take the boats.