jfields

Members
  • Content

    5,437
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback

    0%

Everything posted by jfields

  1. If I were to say, "It is obvious that all Republicans are frothing idiots that have been bitten by rabid dogs", would that make it true? No. It wouldn't. You are saying the entire national media leans far to the left, but then refuse to show any proof. Substantiate your assertion with some facts. You go on about the ways in which Fox is essentially counterbalancing an existing left-leaning media conspiracy. Before we can deal with any individual media outlet's particular slant, we have to have a yardstick of where the center is and a way to judge. If it is so clear, it should be easy for you to document with indisputable facts.
  2. You keep repeating this idea as a fact. Prove it.
  3. Here is where I think you are off base. I don't care if a far-right news channel does fine. They have the right to do it if they want and if the market supports it. That doesn't mean that everything they say is correct. The "left-leaning news" never had total control over the news agenda, nor was that ever an reasonable possibility. We have way too many media outlets and too free a system for that. While it is fine for Fox to lean far to the right, don't claim it is in some role as a freedom-fighter for opressed Republicans everywhere. All "Lefties" don't just choose to pick holes in coverage by Fox because they are on the right. Mostly, it is done when they are just wrong. I'll take issue with left-leaning organizations (like the Washington Post) as well, when they are wrong. It is when the ideology, left, right or otherwise, takes precedence over facts and rationality that people make first-class asses out of themselves.
  4. jfields

    Drunk Foods

    In Washington DC, you need to find one of the remaining Little Taverns. Greasy little burgers. I mean little. They take like 4 bites to eat. But on the plus side, they are cheap and the motto is "Buy 'em by the bag". I'll take a bag of 12, please. MMM, MMM, good!
  5. Nope. You: moose Clay: sheep Skreamer: poodle We've been over this like 100 times. You think the information would have sunk in by now.
  6. Work it! You just need to find yourself a record to get onto. You couldn't even find another virgin to make it a 2-way before. At least now you aren't still working on that one. Maybe the tall-folks-way is your ticket.
  7. Hey, make the best of it! You only get 15 minutes. Then you will be thought of as an ass and have to resort to one-liner post-whoring like the rest of us. Welcome to the dysfunctional online family.
  8. That is just a dropzone accident waiting to happen.
  9. jfields

    At Rantoul I...

    At least they weren't taking pictures of each other's genitals. Look on the bright side....
  10. Well, in itself, it isn't. But it makes a lot of assumptions that aren't necessarily true. Before a "bias" can be "neutralized", it must exist. Second, is the goal fairness of treatment and reporting, or are they simply trying to swing the perceived bias to one that they like? That accomplishes nothing. If you read the article they wrote, you'll see that it is as uselessly derrotory as they say the liberals are to them. Perhaps it is time for them to get some maturity and deal with a real problem in a constructive way.
  11. Oh, please. I thought you said we would have people on hand that know how to do RW. Geez, were you scraping or what?
  12. Okay. No problem. Except when you are talking about gun issues. Who? Me?
  13. If it is trying to be real, it is sad. If it is trying to be satire, it is bad. It didn't strike me as being good at either. Just my $.02. I'm not saying California politics aren't messed up. That wasn't the issue.
  14. jfields

    Mac v Windows

    I'm biased, but I don't think it will, unless you are in one of a few specific fields that favor Macs, such as graphic design and primary education. Even there, I think you can do quite well on a PC.
  15. Dave, I'm not the biggest fan of California, but the source of that "news" is pretty much crap. The quality of writing is poor and the slant is ridiculous. "CNSNews.com is a Division of the Media Research Center" MRC claims to be: "The Leader in Documenting, Exposing and Neutralizing Liberal Media Bias" So putting an alternative spin on the facts and skewing everything to support a conservative agenda is better? That is like saying the way to fix the college admissions inequalities that favor minorities is to support the Klan. It doesn't make any sense if the "cure" is as bad as the problem.
  16. You forgot the option of: I believe in whatever religion supports polygamy. That would get the votes.
  17. I was talking about the moose, but it isn't our fault if Remster can't tell the difference in the dark. Skydekker, welcome to the dark side.
  18. No trouble as long as the "look but don't touch" rule doesn't get violated. My comment was more like a gentlemanly tip of the hat to my fellow Justin. Remster is just jealous, because nobody finds his moose attractive.
  19. That happens when you're the one with the camera.
  20. You're right. I didn't. You were too stubborn to accept any of the repeated times I offered. Next time, I'll buy the damned french fries, sit on you, and force-feed them to you. You've been warned.
  21. No. She is cleaner. Although I don't get my mouth open quite as far to show the "see-food".
  22. Like they would listen to you. All Canadian children are abused by definition. If they were treated decently, their parents would have moved to the US.