yoink

Sure. It's far more likely that you're the only one who's got it all figured out and the other 98% of people here (some of whom can inspect and repack reserves too) are blind, deaf and stupid... Makes as much sense as the rest of your arguments, I guess.

WAIT! Obama said it first!!!

The statue of liberty? And nuclear bombs. And nuclear reactors. And spaceflight. But other than that - NOTHING! Well, the telephone too. Basketball. And YouTube. Jeans, too. Oh, should probably mention the Pen and the Contraceptive pill as well. Nothing particularly useful, really.

I wish there was a way to make you go through the US immigration system... I can tell you from personal ecperience that you wouldn’t feel that the US has no borders.

Bill has refused to remove someone who has admitted that he only posts to draw responses - the dictionary definition of a troll. This is what happens.

The law doesn’t work the way you think it does, that much is clear. A person is not a felon without a conviction, no matter how much you wish it to be true - another part of the constitution you happily ignore when it suits you. The election does not need to have been swung by Russian interference for it to have been illegal - the act of interference or support is the crime itself. Again, what you wish or think doesn’t change these facts. You’re just wrong. I’m going back to ignoring your nonsense. This is like arguing with someone who refuses to believe in gravity.

That's quite a statement. I must have missed where Hillary was convicted of some crime. Please provide a link. Or are you making shit up again?

Those who complain about Russian meddling are traitors because the other side refuses to believe it? That makes sense. another nice try. The point is the accusation of Russian meddling is meant to infer that the only reason Donald J Trump is President is because of said collusion and meddling. Not the case never has been and it's not going to change to show that it was. Try again #bangs head against wall YOU are the only person saying that. You're making up what we're saying and then telling us why we're wrong. It's absolute lunacy. The reports from the US intelligence services only state that there WAS interference, not its causal effects.

‘They’ve been doing it for years’ and ‘it’s not a big deal’. Guess the constitution isn’t as important to rush as he makes out in every gun thread. We should probably alter the 12th amendment to say something like ‘American citizens get 1 vote in each election, foreign powers and criminals can vote as many times as they wish’.

Get this through your thick skull: THE EVENTUAL EFFECT DOESN'T NEGATE THE ATTEMPT. Say it three times before bed each night. I'd be saying the same if Hillary had won in the same circumstances - I doubt you would. I believe that America should attempt to stop people trying to manipulate their elections, because if they're allowed to do so eventually they will succeed. You seem to think this investigation is personal, and it might be. But it has wider ramifications than that. Why do you hate America, Marc?

Do you even know what’s involved in setting up and configuring an email server? It’s laughable that you think Clinton did it. It’s also pathetic that you still bang on about it. Someone who is no longer relevant in politics might have sent 3 classified emails on a non secure server although 8 previous investigations cleared her - lock her up! Charge her!!! But the investigation into enemy manipulation of your electoral system that every US intelligence agency agrees actually happened, and might involve a sitting president? That one ‘should never have started’ and ‘is a witch hunt’.... I’m starting to wonder when we begin to class you as a traitor.

What do you expect from someone who sources Alex Jones? And perhaps I’m going out on a limb, but I’m betting Marc is expect his “Q” baseball cap in the mail any day now. This is the Alex Jones who has just been banned from iTunes, Spotify and Facebook for promoting hate speech? Quality source...

There's something familiar about your posts Marc...Short bursts of angry, quasi-coherent ramblings, often in all caps. It reminds me of something but I can't quite put my finger on it. Well you haven't been here long. You can't find a single post I have ever made that is in all caps. So to that I'm going to call you a liar! LOL!

the whole inference of this Trump Russia collusion bullshit is to try to imply that the only way Trump one was with Russian help. Let me know if you agree with that? What you choose to infer is nothing to do with me. Personally I think the investigation is to see if there is any evidence that Russia did manipulate the election (in whatever way), but particularly if it was aided by Americans. If the end result points at Hillary, Trump or Jon Q Nobody then the punishment should be the same. Let me put it this way - To me, the investigation doesn't matter if Trump won or lost. That's a secondary effect. I've never been jumping up and down claiming collusion. Get it out of your skull. It's a moot point. I agree, the Russians want chaos. What I don’t get is why you wouldn’t want it investigated... Half right. He CAN be served with a subpoena. The legality of it can only be answered by the supreme court, as I understand it. It's not that simple - if an investigation hinged around a critical time (you said you had an alibi for the murder at 1.30 and your times have changed!) then yes, something that simple might be considered perjury. But if it was a random day and 'I went for a burger at 1pm', and that changed to 1.30 then no, it wouldn't. Ask a lawyer. That is your opinion, and as usual it's utter tosh. Why would the president put forward someone to lead an investigation which had the sole purpose of removing him. It's nonsensical. Again, what you choose to believe is up to you, but try and be rational.

I'm still trying to get my head around your stance of not wanting to investigate an adversary trying to meddle in the election. So here's a Democrat saying there WAS interference and you somehow think that's a point in your favor? I'm still waiting for you to explain why you think Trump would perjure himself if he talked to Muller, by the way. And I'm also waiting for you to admit that you CAN subpoena a president.

I don't understand what you think perjury is. The question was 'why not invite Trump to give a complete statement to Muller?' Your response of that being a perjury trap could only be true if you think his story would have changed between what he's said previously and what he would say now. This isn't an opinion piece - that's what perjury is - being caught in a lie under oath. So I'm asking you (because you're the one who stated it), HOW would this be a perjury trap? What do you think he has either lied about previously, or would lie about under oath. Either explain that or admit that it's not a perjury trap.

If I believed it for a second my response would be ‘good’.

Why walk into a perjury trap? Hang on, so you think that telling Muller on record that there was no collusion would be a perjury trap? Only if he’s lying, which would mean that you DO think there was collusion... Which is it?

He didn’t ask, he TWEETED. Totally different.. And the investigation shouldn’t have been started anyway so it’s fine to ask for it to stop, unless it was started under Obama (which it should have), in which case it’s all Obama’s fault that Hillary tried to steal the election with Putin. Anyway, obstructing Justice isn’t a crime. The president is allowed to do it. You guys are just embarrassing yourselves!! LOFL!! How’d I do, rush? Fuck me, it hurt my brain just typing that drivel.

I suggest you re read my post. I said I grew up under a dictator (Robert Mugabe), not that trump is one.

He was still subpoenaed, and so was Nixon. Your claim that you cant subpoena a president is wrong. You and your pesky facts and laws. Fine. he CAN be subpoenad, but it's not a problem if he was. And Clinton did it first.

Don't feel bad. Human memory sucks. Most everybody has a few very vivid, completely fabricated memories, pretty much indistinguishable from real ones. those are my favorite memories!

In the mid 80s whites killing blacks was a pretty big part of their culture too. You know, apartheid and all.

Nah! That is what we have been preparing for since Obama got in. And therein is the irony. You're preparing for something even the left think is a joke.