christelsabine

Two-ply. dudeist skydiver # 3105

Who's Randall in that scene?? dudeist skydiver # 3105

Jeez, Mike, that history is mutual .... Use your (free) guns against everybody you like; if it's not against me or my country fellowmen - I couldn't care less. This time it seems, within your own "rows" there is a rotten apple. One of many running around fully armed killing thier own country fellowmen. If it's OK for you - it's OK.

Try to learn some words in alien languages. Would be helpful. dudeist skydiver # 3105

Why that? You propagandize the freedom to carry weapons wherever you like (or so ...) right? Don't be unfair, OK? Odd how you only seem to grant this leeway to people posting AGAINST guns. Against? No, I did not. I do not care who held the weapons. It's *your* job to find out. Give guns to everybody you like but, do not complain if they're used against *yourself*. That's a normal result. dudeist skydiver # 3105

Why that? You propagandize the freedom to carry weapons wherever you like (or so ...) right? Don't be unfair, OK? dudeist skydiver # 3105

The Wonder Bra ads tell me they lift and separate. Maybe they are good for self-defense as well Wendy P. Especially the ones with the steel reinforcement ... dudeist skydiver # 3105

Wow, Mike. Is that the actual standard you're working on? I'm surprised. dudeist skydiver # 3105

No answers, of course. When you can't explain your own inconsistencies, accuse your opponent of being uneducated or stupid! Yeah, that's a good tactic, you seem to think. But you see, another one of your problems here is that everyone can see right through your lack of explanations, and cheap come-backs. Your opinions are illogical and inconsistent, and you can't support them with any facts or logic. That's what everyone sees from your postings. Have a nice day. Ick! Inconsistency! How does that sound - it's a medical problem of elder people, isn't it? I did not accuse anyone. If the shoe fits, have pleasure.

Yes. I know. But, I'm not. I'm a "she" That's what I had to explain to Mr. Kuai43. dudeist skydiver # 3105

Oh dear JohnRich! That's level of first-graders - if you wanna discuss with me, level should be raised a bit. dudeist skydiver # 3105

.... went to crap?? What a self-confidence. What were you expecting? Detailed instructions how to throw yourself into the tail or yaw rudder or whatelse - while looking cool/new/funny ....? Listen to the oldies, that's best you can do. Ask your instructor. Jump more, you'll learn more about different exits. Skydiving is more than just a cool exit. I was going "what the f*** is this guy going on about, until I checked out where he's from. Then I went "ahh." "Zis is not about ze fun. Ve must stick to ze plan. Zer ist not room for haffing new ideas. Iff you vish to try new things, the OberLeutnant vill issue you clear instructions. Jawohl!" Oh. You heard the voices of your ancestors?? edited to add: The "he" is a "she" dudeist skydiver # 3105

How fine! I really can smell how much you enjoy this wild imagination .... dudeist skydiver # 3105

IIRC, it's not allowed there. I've been hunting in BC. dudeist skydiver # 3105

Who is "we"? Mikey, you really should know that "we" enjoy personal freedom since many many years - at least, I do! I know your actual place is not the best but, mine is .... dudeist skydiver # 3105

I agree. You are unable to assist me. As you walk armed into a NP as well as in the streets (with or w/o red lights). dudeist skydiver # 3105

.... went to crap?? What a self-confidence. What were you expecting? Detailed instructions how to throw yourself into the tail or yaw rudder or whatelse - while looking cool/new/funny ....? Listen to the oldies, that's best you can do. Ask your instructor. Jump more, you'll learn more about different exits. Skydiving is more than just a cool exit. dudeist skydiver # 3105

Forgot one: - The Portuguese Water Dog - dudeist skydiver # 3105

It's called "freedom". If the government forbade every activity that was not free of danger, we would all never be allowed to leave our homes. And this web site would not exist. Freedom? Why do you have red lights? Traffic signs? Speed limitations? Your reply is BS. dudeist skydiver # 3105

Just for clarification: Dr. Angela Merkel is our well respected Chancellor - few minutes ago, she also finished her speech in the US convention. Now, just let's go ahead with the usual rape, murder, beast_eats_men stories .... dudeist skydiver # 3105

Yep. Like I did several times in Canada, preferably in the Algonquin PP, in my memory the "darkest" one. Having been in Canada for hunting few times, I asked a local ranger about dangers while hiking with a kid - my son was 9 y/o that time. His reply was that simple: Carry a whistle, do not leave pathway, you'll be fine. It was not. In the beginning, we were about 5 ppl, after a longer trail of about 6 km, my little one and I were alone - that time, no problem for me at all. From the distance, I already saw our car in the parking area where we started (all is perfectly structured there) - my little boy started running as it was quite dark - rain was coming - I was behind him and then suddenly, there was this black bear mom with a cub only 2 or 3 meters from me down in the bush. Just yelling to my boy to enter the car (which I never lock somewhere in the nature), I just ran like a fool, completely horrified by the noise this black mom made close to my right ear. Running, jumping into the car, all was one movement. Mama bear stood there in surprise, she surely simply was disturbed. Question: Why do they let million tourists walk into thier forests? It is NOT free of danger. I've been in Canada many times since then, never again with a kid. Never again alone w/o a gun. OK, I applied for hunting, which was OK. Way too many people go into the woods/bush/surf believing themselves to be not part of the food chain. Absolutely true. It's just luck, they experience. dudeist skydiver # 3105

Where's the evil-doer, John Rich? Disappeared, like usual? dudeist skydiver # 3105

No. Don't think so. In red or black ........... dudeist skydiver # 3105

That's all what's left in (your) American memory? Miserable. dudeist skydiver # 3105

So what? Snipers must not necessarily be highly trained. Key word is the use of a conceiled weapon in an ambush. Someone should publish a neo-con dictionary where all the definitions are left blank, the owner just pencils in what he sees fit. What? I do not see it as a neo-con-dictionary-whatever- thing. That's none of my biz. Crouching down in a bush, behind the courtains of an open window, covered in a car - aiming at people filling their car with gaz - shooting at them is that easy, it does not need any highly trained sniper. It's just malicious killing. Sniper killing. Has nothing to do with any political tendency. Man, I'm such a simple mind. dudeist skydiver # 3105