christelsabine

Members
  • Content

    6,693
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback

    0%
  • Country

    Germany

Everything posted by christelsabine

  1. What?? Oh yes, you're so right .... dudeist skydiver # 3105
  2. To correct "other news": The rope isn't tied around the testicles. Correct. It's called a *flank* - painful, nevertheless. I disagree. The flank cinch has no more pressure applied to it than the cinch on a saddle horse. For one thing, bucking bulls are worth a lot of money and the owners/stock contractors are not about to cause harm to their stock. Stock contractors and bull riders make their living from these animals and in actuality, bucking bulls are very well taken care of. The flank strap or cinch is not in contact with the testicles of the bull. A lot of lies have been spread about rodeo by animal rights groups and because of this, rodeo has been under 'the microscope'. The reason that a bull bucks is because he wants to get rid of that rider on his back. Bucking bulls are bred for just that... to buck. I hope, that might clear-up any mis-conceptions. Chuck What I said. Chuck - The rope isn't tied around the testicles And that about flank cinches (*roughly* translated): "One of the most important tools to bring the animals to solid defensive play, are the so-called "flank straps". These belts are - as the name suggests - at the edge of the animal, which is extremely sensitive and pressure-sensitive. Upon leaving the starting box, the belt is tightened up so that it exerts on the massive ribs of unprotected abdomen pressure. The pressure pain triggers a defensive behavior in animals, described by organizers as "controlled bumps". Without flank the animals would not "controlled", but buck in all possible directions, so the riders could barely stay on the animals. Although the operators often claim that the belt is loose around the body, this is only true as long as the animals are in the lock-up; at latest after leaving this by tightening the belt gives a big pressure on the belt. Even if the straps have padding to protect it - according to TVT report - they are not protecting against the pain, but just against the visible injuries such as abrasions. .... Furthermore, rodeo supporters often do argue that the rider only would remain 8 seconds on the animals. However, the flank strap for horses are removed by hand, because to stop the horses with the buck, if the rider was thrown off, but continue to decrease in the flank strap does delay the depositing of the flank strap often a considerable time. For bulls, the belt is anatomically related to the urethra, which is likely to intensify the pain. Unlike horses, the flank straps loose through the bumps of itself, so that the defensive reactions stop after the ejection of the rider, nevertheless, the flank strap, according to TVT report is to be considered "as a cause of suffering (stress, anxiety, fear) and also as a potential cause of pain." source; http://www.veganseite.de/tierbefreiung/rodeo I'm not the outspoken protector of animal rights but, since many many years a member of The International League for the Protection of Horses. So I have some doubts. Anyhow, that has nothing to do with you personally or your job or ..... No. It's just what I heard. Christel dudeist skydiver # 3105
  3. "There's a passage I got memorized. Ezekiel 25:17. 'The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the inequities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men.'" -- Jules FYI: Ezekiel 25:17 King James Version (KJV) 17And I will execute great vengeance upon them with furious rebukes; and they shall know that I am the LORD, when I shall lay my vengeance upon them. Yeayea we've all seen Pulp Fiction. Potato Potarto. And with that song, we'll leave the holy path and come back to earth .... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xo228wllnYY&feature=related dudeist skydiver # 3105
  4. Now, now, that IS starting to get personal. Let's have no more of that, shall we? My apologies. I do not know when he was born. I see that "warning" went in one ear, and out the other. Stay classy, now. What? Kelp, I received (very) few warnings in my DZ. life, no need to give me any advice, dear.. dudeist skydiver # 3105
  5. Now, now, that IS starting to get personal. Let's have no more of that, shall we? My apologies. I do not know when he was born. dudeist skydiver # 3105
  6. You're part of the problem too, sweetie. Your insults, like the one above, are routinely ignored by the liberal moderators, who need to clean up their own acts, as well as those of people like yourself. The entire forum is becoming a laughingstock, because of uneven moderation like this. I'm not part of your problem you have with the mods, old fat red man. Clean out your backyard by yourself. Again: Go home and settle your problems via PMs. Not everyone's a Texan. dudeist skydiver # 3105
  7. What do you mean: Steller or stellar? dudeist skydiver # 3105
  8. I think this cop in the vid would probably handle it the same, assumung the "average brother" handled himself well. I watched the video again and I have to agree. That cop did an awesome job and seems like a cool guy with his head on straight. Yep, *his head on straight*. Straight into the camera .... Jesus Christ, how easy is it to fool someone Man guys, no wonder actors ruled your world. dudeist skydiver # 3105
  9. Wooo Doggie! You got some kind of tin-foil hat thing going on today. Maybe it was just a timing issue, where you added the insult after I first saw the post, and before I hit the "quote" button to reply. At any rate, that's the way it appeared to my eyes - the insult wasn't there at first, and it was a few moments later. And instead of taking my advice to heart to change your ways, you choose to hurl yet another insult, which just goes to prove my point. You have become unfit to be a moderator. Why don't you go home and fight your personal battles in PMs? What a laughing stock. And why on earth should someone take *your advice to heart ...'? dudeist skydiver # 3105
  10. To correct "other news": The rope isn't tied around the testicles. Correct. It's called a *flank* - painful, nevertheless. How do you know it causes pain? How do you know it does not? Ever tried? It's plain simple: I owned horses for more than 20 years, so do not ask me such an idiotic question, mnealtx So have I, as well as having ridden rodeo. I *know* of what I speak, you do not. Oh really, cowboy? Bwahahahaaa ....... How do you know? dudeist skydiver # 3105
  11. To correct "other news": The rope isn't tied around the testicles. Correct. It's called a *flank* - painful, nevertheless. How do you know it causes pain? How do you know it does not? Ever tried? It's plain simple: I owned horses for more than 20 years, so do not ask me such an idiotic question, mnealtx dudeist skydiver # 3105
  12. To correct "other news": The rope isn't tied around the testicles. Correct. It's called a *flank* - painful, nevertheless. dudeist skydiver # 3105
  13. Full story: http://www.live5news.com/story/15154990/sc-woman-gets-jury-trial-for-display And you posted that world-shaking article exactly why ....? dudeist skydiver # 3105
  14. That's exactly the point we were trying to make to you - glad to see you're not blaming the tool for the actions of the tool user anymore. Holy sh't, Mike .... Why are you THAT afraid someone would blame your *holy cow (tool resp. weapon)* on anything? How ridiculous and idiotic is THAT reply ???? Who is "we", WTF ?!?!? dudeist skydiver # 3105
  15. And your point is ...? Aaaaw, come on - usually posting just a link is boring, JR. Let's hear your inner voice. dudeist skydiver # 3105
  16. What sh*t is that. As long as per your constitution even the insane are entitled to bear weapons - how and what do policemen have to *protect and serve*?? I'd say: At first action, their own lifes. W/o that, it's quite hard to *serve*. You guys really are weird. Giving every idiot a nearly free access to arms and complaining .... Disarm your citizens and let police officers do their job. The cops are just jealous 'cuz our guns are better than theirs. Ooops. Who's *our*, who's *theirs* ? OK. Who cares .... Seriously: The cops' voice clearly showed anger, a lot of anger .... anger, b/c a simple guy in the street had the balls to tell him, that he carried a weapon .... And that dude was very patient and relaxed. And the officer was very scared ..... dudeist skydiver # 3105
  17. Ok. So if the camp was a Hitler Youth camp, who would be attending? Take your time now, think it through... Do YOU think many who were going back then were doing so willingly? He commented about where they were, not about what they are Think about it carefully. I know you can do it think I mean What a BS. What a poor BS. Even for u. dudeist skydiver # 3105
  18. That worked out well for you guys back in the 30's. Yep. Like your prohibition at that time. Dear, I don't know how old you are. I just know it's the year 2011. dudeist skydiver # 3105
  19. What sh*t is that. As long as per your constitution even the insane are entitled to bear weapons - how and what do policemen have to *protect and serve*?? I'd say: At first action, their own lifes. W/o that, it's quite hard to *serve*. You guys really are weird. Giving every idiot a nearly free access to arms and complaining .... Disarm your citizens and let police officers do their job. dudeist skydiver # 3105
  20. Well, I knew that - I guess I just wasted my irony dudeist skydiver # 3105
  21. I don't get it - what's "OSB"? Oriented strand board? Order of Saint Benedict? Oregon State Bar? What do those have to do with bowling? OSB? It's so easy, Mr. Rich: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mosul_International_Airport You really should get out more often. dudeist skydiver # 3105
  22. http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/07/14/markets-britain-stocks-idUSL6E7IE09320110714 Enjoy your time fighting about homosexuality .... dudeist skydiver # 3105
  23. http://www.thejakartaglobe.com/home/the-world-waits-on-us-debt-crisis-talks/453012 dudeist skydiver # 3105
  24. Well, I suppose the most comon form of supression would be to look at the complexity of life in this amazing world...and after thinking about it for awhile, you say: "Wow! Amazing! I wonder....could it be? Nah, this shit just happens..." Oh no, this sh*t simply did not *happen*, that's the wonder of evolution! Just follow the development of that organism. And nowadays, we're in the position to trace back those developments.