LeeroyJenkins

Both would be collusion. Back on topic. What are your comments on trump Admitting his campaign coluded with the Russians? Please formulate an answer without spin or diflection. Aka try to answer without saying obama, Clinton, or democrat.

Hey rush. Don’t ignore the president admitting to collusion. You can’t just gloss past something that big.

Lol, Trump just confessed on twitter that his campaign coluded with Russia to get dirt on Hilary Clinton.

You do know that Podesta got dragged into the Muller investigation? Also I keep seeing far right people talk about the known collusion between Clinton and the Russians..... Just did some research into it, there are some cognitive leaps needed to somehow believe Republicans and Clinton hiring a law firm to conduct opposition research on Trump is colluding with the Russians. Even more so when the same person believes the DTJr. literally meeting with a Russian to get dirt on Clinton isn't collusion. I get that part of the reason Trump won is because people like you felt left behind in a world where intelligence mattered and race didn't. The most terrifying thing is that you likely vote (If you are American, not sure of this yet, your english is trash, however that could be related to point 1). Trump represented you and many of your beliefs, he blamed brown people for taking your jobs, he blamed Obama for destroying your jobs, he is a racist demagogue. This is everything you wanted in a president. Feelings over facts, and most importantly race and status quo over intelligence and progress. I also know that statements like mine are also part of the reason you voted for trump, he gave voice to all of those people that felt left behind because they were unable to adapt to the modern world we live in.

every political animal will accept a invitation to get dirt on their opposition. We also know that once Trump jr. Got to that meeting they talked about a law regarding adoption. you guys have had the snow and bullshit throw over your eyes so fiercely that you can't see anymore. Not that that surprises me. So you understand that DTJr. accepted a meeting to get dirt on Clinton? You also claim there was no collusion. You have to pick one. I'll even let you slide if you don't know that the Russian adoption issue is the magnitsky act. I dont know what snow or BS you are referring too. We seem to be on the same page. You know DTJr. accepted a meeting to get dirt on Clinton.

Rushmc, Did you just choose to ignore my post where DTJr. admits to meeting with a Russian to get dirt on Clinton?

Even RushMC seems to know he will lie under oath.

Why walk into a perjury trap? Obligatory: U.S. Code. "If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. If, however, the offense, the commission of which is the object of the conspiracy, is a misdemeanor only, the punishment for such conspiracy shall not exceed the maximum punishment provided for such misdemeanor. (June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 701; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(L), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

You used to many words for rush, and I almost forgot! Obligatory: U.S. Code. "If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. If, however, the offense, the commission of which is the object of the conspiracy, is a misdemeanor only, the punishment for such conspiracy shall not exceed the maximum punishment provided for such misdemeanor. (June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 701; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(L), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

No, the point is that he recognises someone who uses the tactics, rhetoric and some of the policies of a dictator. That doesn't mean Trump is a dictator, but he shows a disturbing tendency to want to act like one. Trump is not a dictator, but he does use the same tactics as dictators have. AKA attacking the media.

As you said, "no case to date" DT Jr. Already admitted to meeting Russians to get dirt on Clinton. Like he literally tweeted the evidence. To date no case has shown Russian collusion. You need to remember the Watergate investigation took 6 years. Obligatory: U.S. Code. "If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. If, however, the offense, the commission of which is the object of the conspiracy, is a misdemeanor only, the punishment for such conspiracy shall not exceed the maximum punishment provided for such misdemeanor. (June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 701; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(L), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.) God help us! Now we know we have two people that are deep within the Mueller investigation into Trump Russia collusion. Jesus I'm surprised you haven't leaked everything that's happened to date! What are you rambling about? Your reply does nothing to address the fact that just because charges relating to collusion haven't been filed doesn't mean they will never be filed and it doesn't mean it didn't happen. Anyway.... Here, I will link the tweets for you. I also linked an article that posts it all in chronological order. https://twitter.com/DonaldJTrumpJr/status/884789839522140166 and https://twitter.com/DonaldJTrumpJr/status/884789418455953413 and https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/07/11/us/politics/donald-trump-jr-email-text.html Obligatory: U.S. Code. "If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. If, however, the offense, the commission of which is the object of the conspiracy, is a misdemeanor only, the punishment for such conspiracy shall not exceed the maximum punishment provided for such misdemeanor. (June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 701; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(L), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

As you said, "no case to date" DT Jr. Already admitted to meeting Russians to get dirt on Clinton. Like he literally tweeted the evidence. To date no case has shown Russian collusion. You need to remember the Watergate investigation took 6 years. Obligatory: U.S. Code. "If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. If, however, the offense, the commission of which is the object of the conspiracy, is a misdemeanor only, the punishment for such conspiracy shall not exceed the maximum punishment provided for such misdemeanor. (June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 701; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(L), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

I suggest you re read my post. I said I grew up under a dictator (Robert Mugabe), not that trump is one. One of the better Dodges I have seen on Speakers Corner. You brought up the word dictator and the implication of your post is clear. Now you try to back away from that post with your tail tucked between your legs saying I didn't read your post. Well you had a great fail when you did that and everybody here seen it! Rush, his original comment was I know you try to spin like kellyanne, you're just really bad at it. Obligatory: U.S. Code. "If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. If, however, the offense, the commission of which is the object of the conspiracy, is a misdemeanor only, the punishment for such conspiracy shall not exceed the maximum punishment provided for such misdemeanor. (June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 701; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(L), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

I thought you said a president couldn’t be subpoenaed? It’s ok, you were wrong. You are correct, neither of them testified under subpoena, one of them resigned and the other one was impeached. you can issue the damn thing. Doesn't mean it has to be answered. And most legal Scholars say a sitting president cannot be subpoenaed and if they are they don't have to answer it All of those scholars would be wrong BECAUSE PRESIDENTS HAVE ALREADY BEEN SUBPOENAED You really need to pick one point that doesn't contradict yourself. Either the president can or cannot be subpoenaed. Obligatory: U.S. Code. "If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. If, however, the offense, the commission of which is the object of the conspiracy, is a misdemeanor only, the punishment for such conspiracy shall not exceed the maximum punishment provided for such misdemeanor. (June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 701; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(L), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

Is he even American? "everyone here seen it" Obligatory: U.S. Code. "If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. If, however, the offense, the commission of which is the object of the conspiracy, is a misdemeanor only, the punishment for such conspiracy shall not exceed the maximum punishment provided for such misdemeanor. (June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 701; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(L), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

The last three are all true bill. Hypocrite much Like, you can read right?

I will be around for the boogie it seams.

Almost forgot:

I thought you said a president couldn’t be subpoenaed? It’s ok, you were wrong. You are correct, neither of them testified under subpoena, one of them resigned and the other one was impeached.

We should all post this quote with every one of our comments until rush acknowledges it.

At least someone is draining the swamp! Get em all out of DC.

He was still subpoenaed, and so was Nixon. Your claim that you cant subpoena a president is wrong.

RushMC, The president can be subpoenaed. Thank Bill for that.

What's the best DZ in CT?

Ya. That's it. Oh hey you can see my comments. If that isn’t it, why don’t you ever anyswer my questions or address my comments? Here is an easy one. Do you believe the muller investigation should run until it is concluded? It never should have ever started. But now it will need to run it's course of liberals heads will explode.. Which might happen anyway.... You almost managed to give a straight answer without any spin or deflection! Anyway, you falsely stated collusion wasn't a crime again so I will repost what you already chose to ignore once.