olemisscub

What I’m doing is indeed quite aggravating, isn’t it?

lol how are you still not getting this?

You’re wrong. This is privileged information, so I can’t actually reveal it yet. My book publishers have advised me not to reveal it.

I can’t explain, sorry. But I’m right and have won this debate.

Yeah, you both have theories, but his are always right.

Well, you’re wrong. I’m right.

Cooper having trouble with the lever. Didn’t happen.

I know for a fact that didn’t happen.

He had a helmet correct? And a jump suit IIRC. I don’t assume all are the same. I assume that landing at night ANYWHERE in an unknown spot is perilous and likely to cause injury. The copycats bear that out.

Cooper was not smart enough to figure out a simple lever? So your argument is that he wouldn’t understand that he needed to push the button at the top before operating the lever? He was a grown man in his 40’s who could build a convincing looking (or real) dynamite bomb and he was capable enough to pull off a heist, yet he didn’t understand a push button lever even after someone had described it to him?

Well good, that makes it even more likely that my ASSUMPTION that Cooper was likely injured more probable if the only one who got out unscathed was McCoy. Also bolsters the argument that even if Cooper was injured, it wasn’t incapacitating. Only one injured to that degree was LaPoint.

So, he was actually falling quite stable for some time, due to how exited (I guess?). He said he inches down the stairs on his butt them turned over onto his knees and scooched himself out of the small gap. Because of the aircraft speed he says he only had about a foot and a half of clearance. He eventually eases himself out to where he was simply holding on with just his hands to the bottom step and his body was completely horizontal. When he let go he said he put his arms and legs out and was falling stable until he reached to the pull the ripcord and spun out of control. He says he has no memory of pulling it. 330mph with just a military front reserve. Yikes.

Among the copycats, LaPoint essentially broke his ankle, Mac received a concussion, and Heady dislocated his shoulder. McCoy was unscathed and I assume Hahneman was, as he was seen the next day (or maybe the day after that) in a local town receiving a shave. Odds of Cooper being banged up seem very high, but just not enough to actually impede his escape since he appears to have done that successfully.

By not using this sketch?

What are examples of these nutty ideas? Wonder if they’re as nutty as thinking that a human being has better memory retention within days of an event than they do a year after an event. Such a wild idea of mine to think that…

Funny. You have a habit of dishing it out but not being able to take it. You literally called me all of these names within a single 3 day period back in 2023.

He won’t tell you. It’s top secret. But just trust him…it TOTALLY helps his argument. We’ve already had a passenger do his own sketch fwiw. Spreckel was a graphic designer and modified Comp A less than a week after the hijacking. I’ve FOIA’d for a cleaner version of it, but clearly it still resembles Comp A. It’s just too bad Spreckel didn’t draw one a year later since his memory of Cooper’s face would have been MUCH better at that time…

I have enough confidence in it to post it everywhere in the Cooperverse and discuss it on my show in front of a couple thousand people. You would never dare express this illogical Comp B argument anywhere where you might get more than one or two responses. You might get your feelings hurt if you did. and you wanna talk about aggression? You must have zero confidence in any of your opinions considering that you are easily the most aggressive Cooperite besides Blevins. And do tell what wacky opinions I have. I suppose it doesn’t get any wackier than thinking that someone’s memory is better two days after an event as opposed to their memory300 days after an event. How wacky. Forgive me for not thinking that my memory of the dude I just saw at the gas station is going to be better a year from now than two days from now. Truly wacky. and that’s really rich talk from you claiming that I have wacky opinions considering whom you believe to be Cooper. It was pretty humorous the other day when you wrote that you just have to figure out how the FBI never realized that they had Cooper in custody with Hahneman. Hmmm… what could those reasons be? Perhaps because he wasn’t Cooper?

Yes, I invented Tina saying that Comp A looks “almost 100% like him” and Flo saying she “likes it very much” within days of the event. Sheer invention. I also invented the passengers only suggesting that slight alterations be made to it. Anyone who isn’t agenda driven to support Comp B would very easily understand that a sketch that the witnesses like days after an event must logically be believed to be better than a sketch everyone likes of a different looking person made a year after the event. Claiming that a belief in such a thing is an “invention” is pathetic. Human memory doesn’t work like you’re suggesting. Also, why in the hell would me honestly interpreting the case files a certain way and then actually sharing it on open forums be “clickbait”? An example of clickbait would be claiming to have an unreleased image of Cooper and then telling people that they would have to buy my book to see it, and yes, I know you’ve never said that. I’m merely pointing out with Clickbait would actually be. Finally, I take no personal stance in the book as to which one is better. The book is about the history of the Cooper case, not my opinions. People who have proofread my book like Mark would attest that my book does not have outright opinions. I simply lay out the facts. Since you seem so preoccupied with what I’m going to say in the book, this is my conclusion to the chapter about the sketches. CLicKbaIT!!1!

It’s absurd to argue a sketch made a year after an event is better than one made days later that has a consensus. Now that we all know that Flo liked Comp A, there is no reason whatsoever to dismiss it. Your agenda constantly drips through with this Comp B belligerence of yours. You know that there is no chance in hell that you could realistically get to Hahneman from Comp A. Impossible. But if you squint really hard, go cross-eyed, and then stand on your head then maybe you could get to Hahneman from Comp B.

Not by the sketch artist as he was drawing it. They were shown faxes of the sketch by agents whenever these agents could catch them at an airport and they suggested changes.

I don’t need anyone to be lying, just mistaken. This is the same as the agent in 1980 reporting an erroneous statement about the money. Whoever believes Bill was more involved than Flo in Comp B is demonstrably wrong. There isn’t even a reasonable argument to be made. And the process is irrelevant when it’s done 9-12 months after an event. Who the hell would remember a face they only saw for a few moments 9 months after they saw that face? It’s absurd. Also, we have about as much input from the passengers with Comp A as we do with Comp B.

Lord have mercy, this again lol. Really? This isn’t complicated. The FBI concluded it was the best likeness because they didn’t realize there had been a consensus on Comp A. They’d have had no reason not to just age Comp A up and give him color if they realized there was a consensus. When every key witness likes a sketch (as they did with Comp A) there is no reason to turn the sketch into a completely different human except for a belief that there wasn’t a consensus. Of random interest is that it wasn’t case agents who recommended that the sketch be changed. It was an independent group of FBI investigators. FBI Director told the NORJAK case agents to select a couple of agents with fresh eyes to review the case files and write a report within two weeks with new leads or suggestions. The recommendation (not a terrible suggestion in principle to age the sketch up) and their mistake was part of this review.