skydyvr

According to Reuters, the figure is now 20,000 dead. What a horrible tragedy. . . =(_8^(1)

And here's your sign . . . . . =(_8^(1)

Well, I don't have a giant penis, and I can't fart on demand, so what better ways would you suggest to get the chicks? . . =(_8^(1)

Good gawd man. If I read another "revenge for daddy" cliche in here, I am going to blow the pilot light out, turn on the gas, and shove my head in the oven! Well said. Merry Christmas Vinny! . . =(_8^(1)

Dude, why bother responding at all? Do you see anything in this thread that rises above a basic level of unoriginal, lamentatious, and regurgitated spittle? To me, this thread appears to be profoundly un-inspired, aka another troll that offers a bland dish of sophomoric whining, but no interesting alternatives or solutions to anything. . . =(_8^(1)

Why yes . . . yes I am!! . . =(_8^(1)

I have a strong interest in having a painting made of me during my first jump without AFF instructors attached. In other words, AFF 4 or so. Are there other examples of your work to be seen? . . =(_8^(1)

Playstation = wider selection of games XBox = better on-line gaming opportunity Either = can't lose, they're both great . . =(_8^(1)

Hearing "voices" is something that happens to all of us. We just define the "source" in different ways. A religious person might define the voices as "hearing from God". Bush probably falls into this category. A non-religious person might define those same voices as "my conscience speaking to me". Either way, it's that "voice" that continually corrects, advises, teaches, and helps us learn, grow, and discern right from wrong in our lives. Of course, this only applies to sane people. There are illnesses that cause people to "hear voices" in an entirely different way, but I don't believe Bush falls into that category. Currently, I believe that the Bush Administration truly believed the intel they had at the time. If actual deceit is ever proven, I will be just as angry about it as anyone else. Are you drawing these conclusions from a poll? Point me to it please? I will admit that a lot of Americans probably do believe these things as fact, but my point is/was that not ALL of us "blindly" follow anything. . . =(_8^(1)

I nominate the body collective. Take away any single poster and things won't change much, but add up everyone and the result is something very special. . . =(_8^(1)

Here's a question for you: Do you believe that if a US citizen agrees with "where their country is going", that it also means they are blind followers? In your opinion, can anyone agree with our President's policies and not be a blind follower? If so, then what are the percentages. How many are blind? How many can see? How do you tell the difference? If I agree with some or all of our President's past actions, does that define me as blind? . . =(_8^(1)

Hey Chuteless, what's the biblical connection to 2005/06? I'm curious about why you think this. . . =(_8^(1)

Great write up! . . =(_8^(1)

>> 5) Always attack in packs and >> do not forget to congratulate >> each other for doing so. Borrowing ideas from the Right Wing Club playbook again? . . =(_8^(1)

Look like lightin' up a phattie wins out, however Hitler does get a (dis)honorable mention! . . =(_8^(1)

Actually no, it is hockey season. . . =(_8^(1)

You are all wrong! 4:20 (April 20) is Adolph Hitler's birthday, and therefore is used symbolically by Hitler lovers (and foggy minded kids who don't know better) to denote all kinds of "hey look at me, I'm evil" stuff. . . =(_8^(1)

I got married this year, after "shacking up" for 12. There is an 82% chance our marriage will fail in the first year, due to the long time spent together before getting married. Talk about living on the edge, man pass me the Gatoraide! . . =(_8^(1)

Well capt'n, it looks like the current exchange rate between Fucktards and Sorry Excuses for Human Beings isn't very good, and early market reports indicate the situation isn't going to improve. Sorry Excuses for Human Beings have risen steadily above the DOW index, but Fucktards have fallen through the floor throughout the last quarter. Bottom line: You'd be wise to unload all of your Fucktards before they completely lose their value. Tell you what, I'll give you two Sorry Excuses for Human Beings, three Eat Shit and Die Assholes, and a Jolly Good Fuck-You for all of your remaining Fucktards. Deal? In other market news, it appears that greenie powered fuck-you threads are up, while calling people bigots in gun threads are down, down, down. Don't invest in those! . . =(_8^(1)

Maybe to some, but not with me or a lot of others I've seen on here. But I've read that personal attacks were prohibited here. Interesting. Yes, and I've pointed it out in these forums. And I've questioned Bush's crappy "American cowboy" style of foreign policy and his overall speaking skills. I've done that here, on these forums. And to respond to your comments in anoher thread: Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to you. Please resist the temptation to beat me up if you see me at Eloy. . . =(_8^(1)

"Funny shit", Dean grunted just before going on stage, "but don't you boneheads know what this is going to do to my reputation?". . . =(_8^(1)

But to maintain integrity, you only get to choose one of these: 1. I will treat others as I would want them to treat me. 2. I will treat others as they have treated me. You seem to pick either/or at your convenience, and that smacks of disingenuousness. When it comes to the left, Billvon, Quade, PhillyKev, Kallend, and a handful of others deliver fire. You deliver color and comedy. . . =(_8^(1)

Based on the personal insults she gets away with on occassion, this must be the case. . . =(_8^(1)

But many of your previous posts indicate otherwise, including this one: And blah, and blah, and blah. Have a nice evening. Edited to add: Jeanne, feel free to continue your enchanting evening scouring through my old posts (LOL) and post a few of the ones where I've expressed disdain for GWB, or agreed with what a *reasonable* (read: not Jeanne) leftie had to say on here. That should keep you entertained for hours! . . =(_8^(1)

I disagree with you. The term "hate speech" very accurately describes what comes out of your keyboard in these political threads. Numerous posters have pointed this out, because it is very easy to discern. And I repeat, the phrase: is, in and of itself, in the context within which it was written, the statement of a bigot. I'm sorry, but those words sound sort of paranoid. I'm on the right, and know many people "throughout the right", and haven't run into any racists yet. I'm sure they exist -- just as they exist across the entire spectrum of life -- but surely not to the extent your writings indicate. After reading through your political commentary for the last year or so, I've concluded that you believe a) most all republicans are racists and bigots, and b) most racists and bigots are republicans. If I'm correct about those conclusions, then you must be bigoted against republicans. And, not being any sort of racist or bigot myself, it's personally offensive to read. . . =(_8^(1)