promise5

Short of facts? No I have not gone through the list of every TI that currently is certified and them cross checked them to the registry. I have only researched the ones that were brought up in discussions. So no I do not know exactly how many there are, but there is more then one sad to say. None of which were convicted of peeing in public,streaking or 18 and having sex with their 16 year old girlfriend. I've done research on this and not to be disrespectful to anyone but I'll ask. Has anyone else ? No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

There is none ? You have done the research to prove there isn't. Like I stated earlier I deal in reality. When I had this discussion with my friend/friends to begin with there already was a reality in place. I'm sorry but even though a few are close friends of mine I still didn't take their word. I did my own homework, as I would hope anyone would do. No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

You better run and then when you trip and break your leg I'll be soooooo gentle in helping you. Really I will! No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

Wrong No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

Fred No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

Yellow No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

Addressing reality Thunk?? No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

Figs! Yum No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

Filled No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

I'm sure the attorneys on here could answer this a lot better then I could. I'll take a guess though. I would assume that if someone is legally working in the US from another country that would need some kind if sponsor or permit to work. I would think I background check would be performed prior to issuing this. I know when I drove through Canada if you were convicted of I'm not sure what level of crime they wouldn't let you into the country. Maybe that's just a border thing. I don't know. I would also think that anyone would just assume someone us guilty if something just to be sure. That's a sad way to live a life. Also, DZ's are that desperate for TI's that they would need to hire someone from another country that has been convicted of rape or child molestation?? If that's the case holy crap!! I think them maybe some fund raising etc. is in order so that people can be sponsored to get their TI certification that might not be able to afford it. So that DZ don't have to look outside the US for TI's that have been convicted of rape or child molestation. No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

Mind No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

It's free to run a check from there you can see what the person is convicted of. It just takes a little work, a very little. Less then 10 minutes. No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

I guess because it's unknown for the most part. If someone says there is 1 or 2 or 5 then is that such a low number to some that they say why bother. As I've said I don't think that the sport is that desperate for TI's that it needs a rapist or someone that molested a child as representatives of the sport. No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

I disagree. By switching to the DZO's it then allows for them to do their own research and then if they choose make a case by case decision on wether to hire someone. Doesn't that then lessen the likelihood of someone that is unjustly on the list to be effected. I'm curious how many that are unjustly on the list because they streaked or peed in public are in fact TI's? Maybe you're thinking that even asking the DZ owners is to much ? No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

3D No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

If there are TI's that are or if there's been issues ? Then I guess it would be define issues. What one person has an issue with another one wouldn't. No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

I guess I would ask you how it is a witch hunt? Not targeting a single individual No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

I agree. I don't want to bring something up and have someone else do the work. I just don't want it to be a witch hunt. No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

It was sad to see the thread get off track because it's such an important issue. I would like to open further discussion. Opinions on: A carefully constructed letter being sent to DZO's making them aware of and asking if they would be open to checking their TI's etc. for registers sex offenders and then making the decision to hire them or not. Thoughts ?? Though this still needs to go before the USPA. Well that's my opinion anyway. No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

Kilts No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

Highland games No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

Really?? He was on drugs? No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

Mad hatter No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

Horse No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.