It appears Clinton not only doesn't know what "wipe a server" means, she can't even operate a calendar.

[rehmwa 2]

She's doing much better.

Not ONCE during the entire debate did she let any secret or confidential information loose.

As a bonus - we can also note that never in the debate was she observed to take a bribe.

baby steps people - we're all human



actually none of the 5 were observed in this behavior. Not bad for 5 old white career politicians

...
Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

[DanG 1]

That was such a lame debate.

Chaffee is done (or should be)
Webb came off like a royal assshole
O'Malley was okay, he very Presidential
Sanders is unelectable
Clinton just spouted off taking points

And it wasn't even entertaining like the Republican shit show.

- Dan G

[rehmwa 2]

DanG

That was such a lame debate.

Chaffee is done (or should be)
Webb came off like a royal assshole
O'Malley was okay, he very Presidential
Sanders is unelectable
Clinton just spouted off taking points

And it wasn't even entertaining like the Republican shit show.

on all the talk stations for my drive in this morning around here - the 3 right wing and the 2 lefty, if you delete the blind coolaid drinkers from both sides and only listen to people talking in a normal tone of voice........your conclusion is pretty much the consensus

...
Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

[rushmc 23]

turtlespeed

*********

Quote

It is being reported today that an email,

look forward to the source, no doubt from some right wing conservative tripe site....

And that is because, 1) your bias won't allow you to consider it may just be true, 2) most media sources are left leaning, and true fact reporting in biased news is a reare event anymore, 3) it was an inflammatory piece by a right leaning blog page.

Which one did you discover it to be?

so then you do acknowledge that it came from a right wing tripe site. thanks.

I expect your bias won't allow you to consider it may just NOT be true. welcome to the club.

All I did was admit that there was a possibility, which one did your research tell you which one it was.

Actually, I believe I was listening to SRN news on AM radio

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[rushmc 23]

DanG

And it wasn't even entertaining like the Republican shit show.

Maybe because CNN decided to do this differently than the Republican debates?

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[SkyDekker 1,465]

rushmc

***

And it wasn't even entertaining like the Republican shit show.

Maybe because CNN decided to do this differently than the Republican debates?

LMAO, yes THAT is the reason....

[DanG 1]

CNN's moderation of the debate seemed similar in professionalism, by which I mean a severe lack thereof.

I didn't think the format was all that different, but it's harder to wrangle 15 people compared to five.

- Dan G

[rushmc 23]

DanG

CNN's moderation of the debate seemed similar in professionalism, by which I mean a severe lack thereof.

I didn't think the format was all that different, but it's harder to wrangle 15 people compared to five.

For the republican debate CNN's stated goal was to get the candidates fighting each other.

Tapper said yesterday that CNN would NOT do that during the democratic debate

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[turtlespeed 226]

DanG

CNN's moderation of the debate seemed similar in professionalism, by which I mean a severe lack thereof.

I didn't think the format was all that different, but it's harder to wrangle 15 people compared to five.

That depends on wether or not the debate moderator was having her monthly at the time.

I mean the Don says it affected her moderation after all.

I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

[DanG 1]

Quote

That depends on wether or not the debate moderator was having her monthly at the time.

I mean the Don says it affected her moderation after all.

Perhaps, but that was on Fox, not CNN.

- Dan G

[DanG 1]

Quote

For the republican debate CNN's stated goal was to get the candidates fighting each other.

Tapper said yesterday that CNN would NOT do that during the democratic debate

I wasn't aware that they had made those statements.

The format seemed pretty similar. Did you watch both debates?

- Dan G

[rushmc 23]

DanG

Quote

For the republican debate CNN's stated goal was to get the candidates fighting each other.

Tapper said yesterday that CNN would NOT do that during the democratic debate

I wasn't aware that they had made those statements.

The format seemed pretty similar. Did you watch both debates?

No
And I have only commented on what was said here and what I seen reported coming from CNN

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[Coreeece 2]

SkyDekker

******

And it wasn't even entertaining like the Republican shit show.

Maybe because CNN decided to do this differently than the Republican debates?

LMAO, yes THAT is the reason....



Republican Debate - Jack Tapper:
"What the team and I have been doing is trying to craft questions that, in most cases, pit candidates against the other -- specific candidates on the stage -- on issues where they disagree, whether it's policy, or politics, or leadership. Let's actually have them discuss and debate."

Democratic Debate - Anderson Cooper:
"I'm always uncomfortable with that notion of setting people up in order to kind of promote some sort of a face off...Look, these are all serious people. This is a serious debate. They want to talk about the issues and I want to give them an opportunity to do that."

Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour

[Coreeece 2]

DanG

Quote

For the republican debate CNN's stated goal was to get the candidates fighting each other.

Tapper said yesterday that CNN would NOT do that during the democratic debate

I wasn't aware that they had made those statements.

I posted the statements in my reply to SkyDekker above.

DanG

The format seemed pretty similar. Did you watch both debates?

Ya, and tho the moderators were equally as "tough" on the candidates, the difference in the debates is demonstrated in the very first questions.

Republican Debate 1st Question:
Fiorina, such-and-such said that Trump is a hot-head and shouldn't have his finger on the button. You have even questioned trump's temperament...should he have access to the launch codes?

Democratic Debate 1st question:
Hillary, you flip flop so much...will you say anything to get ellected?

Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour

[rushmc 23]

Funny thing is CNN never tried to hide this

Kind of exposed the left chosen news sources

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[kallend 2,150]

“This may not be politically correct, but I think that there was a big part of this investigation that was designed to go after people and an individual, Hillary Clinton,” Rep. Richard Hanna (R-N.Y.)

www.cnn.com/2015/10/14/politics/hillary-clinton-benghazi-committee/index.html

...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

[brenthutch 444]

kallend

“This may not be politically correct, but I think that there was a big part of this investigation that was designed to go after people and an individual, Hillary Clinton,” Rep. Richard Hanna (R-N.Y.)

www.cnn.com/2015/10/14/politics/hillary-clinton-benghazi-committee/index.html

Are you talking about the Obama administration's FBI investigation?

[aphid 0]

brenthutch

***
“This may not be politically correct, but I think that there was a big part of this investigation that was designed to go after people and an individual, Hillary Clinton,” Rep. Richard Hanna (R-N.Y.)

www.cnn.com/2015/10/14/politics/hillary-clinton-benghazi-committee/index.html

Are you talking about the Obama administration's FBI investigation?

The first sentence in the item linked:
"Another Republican lawmaker says the House Select Committee on Benghazi is meant to go after former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton."

[rushmc 23]

turtlespeed

Big surprise . . . She lied . . . Again.

BOY DID SHE
And this one is a federal crime

CBS is reporting a released email where HC instructs and aid to remove the classified marking on some info!!!

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[normiss 897]

"A State Department official declined to comment on Grassley's statement, but told CNN earlier in the day that the department has "no indication at this time that the document being discussed was emailed to her."

"I'm not going to speculate about whether the document being discussed was classified," this official added. "Generally speaking, I can say that just because a document is sent via a secure method doesn't mean that it's classified. Many documents that are created or stored on a secure system are not classified."

[SkyDekker 1,465]

Quote

And this one is a federal crime

CBS is reporting a released email where HC instructs and aid to remove the classified marking on some info!!!

Common sense would dictate it is only illegal if the information was actually classified.

[rushmc 23]

SkyDekker

Quote

And this one is a federal crime

CBS is reporting a released email where HC instructs and aid to remove the classified marking on some info!!!

Common sense would dictate it is only illegal if the information was actually classified.

LOL

Gotta admit
She has got the best spinmasters in her corner

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[wmw999 2,589]

I used to develop code on a secure system. Stuff sent to the system had to be vetted very carefully (because of the danger of viruses and/or Trojans). We didn't have a direct connection to the Internet.
OTOH, stuff generated on that system was determined as sensitive or not by whoever generated it, based on their training. Most of it wasn't sensitive.
It was a real pain in the rear to use, though.

Wendy P.

There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown)

[rushmc 23]

SkyDekker

Quote

And this one is a federal crime

CBS is reporting a released email where HC instructs and aid to remove the classified marking on some info!!!

Common sense would dictate it is only illegal if the information was actually classified.

But of course you are correct

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/election/article53685825.html

"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

[SkyDekker 1,465]

rushmc

***

Quote

And this one is a federal crime

CBS is reporting a released email where HC instructs and aid to remove the classified marking on some info!!!

Common sense would dictate it is only illegal if the information was actually classified.

LOL

Gotta admit
She has got the best spinmasters in her corner



Huh? how is that a spin?

Forget it is Hillary Clinton.

If someone instructs an underling to remove a classified marking, because the information contained in the document isn't classified, then I doubt a crime has been committed.

Are you refuting this?