0
turtlespeed

It appears Clinton not only doesn't know what "wipe a server" means, she can't even operate a calendar.

Recommended Posts

Amazon


It appears Clinton Derangement Syndrome is strong in your ELK.:ph34r:

Just pointing it out for those with blinders on.

Headline: New Emails Show Clinton Used Private Server Earlier Than She Said
I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Amazon


It appears Clinton Derangement Syndrome is strong in your ELK.:ph34r:

Oops. Looks like more was found.

This little excerpt is telling:
Quote

“The State Department, which has failed to comply with multiple Benghazi Committee requests and failed to act in good faith, is now indicating it intends to foster a more cooperative relationship with the committee," Ware said in an emailed statement to ABC News. "It’s curious the Department is suddenly able to be more productive after recent staff changes involving those responsible for document production."


I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
brenthutch


It appears Clinton Derangement Syndrome is strong in your ELK.:ph34r:

Turtlespeed has a large deer? I don't get it. Perhaps your outrage hormones are interfering with your brains ability to function.

BTW not an attack, just an observation.

How long have you been in this forum?????


Some people are just kind of slow on the uptake of a joke I guess..... then again.... some folks are just slow in general round these parts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Amazon


It appears Clinton Derangement Syndrome is strong in your ELK.:ph34r:

Turtlespeed has a large deer? I don't get it. Perhaps your outrage hormones are interfering with your brains ability to function.

BTW not an attack, just an observation.

How long have you been in this forum?????


Some people are just kind of slow on the uptake of a joke I guess..... then again.... some folks are just slow in general round these parts.

Late for the party isn't always bad.:ph34r:

Any comments or defense that the emails started +/- 60 days before she said they did?

And why did they only give paper copies instead of electronic copies?
I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Anvilbrother

Another backup server just got turned over for investigation. Hopefully they are able to put all the pieces together.



From what little reporting I have seen, the tech boys went into CYA mode when they were asked to wipe the server
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Anvilbrother

Yep they realized this was not going to blow over.



And that choice may save their bacon before this is over
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
SkyDekker

Maybe you guys could have 7 investigations into this....



The current one is working just as it should


Why the fuck do you care anyway

I sure as hell don't care what you think about it either
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
"The discovery appears to contradict Clinton's sworn statement that she had turned over all the email from her private server to the State Department."

Making false statements:

Making false statements (18 U.S.C. § 1001) is the common name for the United States federal crime laid out in Section 1001 of Title 18 of the United States Code, which generally prohibits knowingly and willfully making false or fraudulent statements, or concealing information, in "any matter within the jurisdiction" of the federal government of the United States, even by mere denial.

The statute spells out this purpose in subsection 18 U.S.C. § 1001(a), which states:

(a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully—

(1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device[ , ] a material fact;
(2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or
(3) makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry
shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, …

Wonder what her punishment will be? Getting elected president?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
SkyDekker

Maybe you guys could have 7 investigations into this....



Who cares about the congressional investigation, I am keeping my eye on the Obama administration's FBI investigation. They just seized four State Department servers and have convinced a second tech company to turn state's evidence. Sidney Blumenthal, outing a CIA officer over a non-secured network?!?! Clinton signs an affidavit claiming all of her "work related" emails have been turned over and then..... Oops the David Petraeus emails are discovered. Can you say perjury?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
in 2008, John McCain said he never used email or computers for that matter.

does that make him an ignorant lying incompetent? I have a dozen tandem customers each week that do not know how to download their videos either. Maybe we should form a congressional committee on that too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
tkhayes

in 2008, John McCain said he never used email or computers for that matter.

does that make him an ignorant lying incompetent? I have a dozen tandem customers each week that do not know how to download their videos either. Maybe we should form a congressional committee on that too.



Did he sign an affidavit ? During a congressional investigation?

Are you forced to let these people that cannot download their video run a significant piece of the government? One that obviously has the decision making responsibility that costs lives?

But, hey, what difference does it make anyway?
I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
tkhayes

Quote

Did he sign an affidavit ?



so before you sign any affidavits, you should be familiar with wiping servers and other IT technologies?



Ah, it means you should not get caught in a lie when testifying!
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Ah, it means you should not get caught in a lie when testifying!



The title of the thread indicates that she is technologically illiterate in some ways. but back to your point...no 'lies' have ever been established.

The claim is/was that since she is technologically illiterate, she must therefore also be a liar.

If she indeed lied, then the foaming-at-the-mouth republicans no doubt would be seeking federal charges....which they are not nor ever have been.

And please do not say..."She's under investigation..." because everyone is under investigation every time someone asks them a question.

You are under investigation by me, pretty much every day. I guess that then makes you corrupt, a liar and everything else negative that I can think of calling you.

it holds no merit - just like the accusations in the thread.

If there was teeth to anything that she is accused of, this would be a whole lot farther along in that 'investigation.

more wah wah wah from the rigth wing, trying to make poop stick.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
tkhayes

Quote

Ah, it means you should not get caught in a lie when testifying!



The title of the thread indicates that she is technologically illiterate in some ways. but back to your point...no 'lies' have ever been established.

The claim is/was that since she is technologically illiterate, she must therefore also be a liar.

If she indeed lied, then the foaming-at-the-mouth republicans no doubt would be seeking federal charges....which they are not nor ever have been.

And please do not say..."She's under investigation..." because everyone is under investigation every time someone asks them a question.

You are under investigation by me, pretty much every day. I guess that then makes you corrupt, a liar and everything else negative that I can think of calling you.

it holds no merit - just like the accusations in the thread.

If there was teeth to anything that she is accused of, this would be a whole lot farther along in that 'investigation.

more wah wah wah from the rigth wing, trying to make poop stick.



Do you HONESTLY believe she is as ignorant as you agree she claims herself to be?
I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I am thinking many do not



And I agree it only has to do with what people think, so you appear to be agreeing that there is nothing to this other than 'appearance'

which is important if you are running for President and certainly everything the GOP is rubbing their hands excitedly about.

NOTHING to do with technology, ignorance, lying, corruption, emails, servers or whatever.

But at least your glory-boy-former-running-for-house-speaker already exposed it for what it really is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
tkhayes

Quote

I am thinking many do not



And I agree it only has to do with what people think, so you appear to be agreeing that there is nothing to this other than 'appearance'

which is important if you are running for President and certainly everything the GOP is rubbing their hands excitedly about.

NOTHING to do with technology, ignorance, lying, corruption, emails, servers or whatever.

But at least your glory-boy-former-running-for-house-speaker already exposed it for what it really is.



You live in a very secluded world
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0