georger

Unreal! That I did not know. Good grief...............................

NEW - Florence Schaffner was followed after the flight by a man who claimed that the hijacker was working with the CIA … https://thecinemaholic.com/where-is-florence-schaffner-now/

For those who dont speak 'latin', "Ad hoc" is a Latin term meaning "for this purpose only, describing something created out of immediate necessity that may not have been part of a larger original plan. Common examples would include an ad hoc committee formed to address a temporary emergency, an ad hoc solution to a particular problem like a broken window, and the like. One issue is whether something is actually ad hoc or not. Until you talk to the original source it can only be speculation

ok ... your featured speaker at Coopercopn25 should be Flyjack. Give him a week to explain 'path'.

Too complicated and open ended to be useful.

Crazy. Human microbes did not decompose the Cooper money! This is crazy. This isnt worth responding to - - - - - this is stupid. Play with yourself.

Or what!? Are you threatening me or the forum now ?

I think .... very clearly, your limitations have now been exposed. Your knee-jerk logic is not logic. Your scientific background is obviously lacking. ........................ all of that just for starters.Your analysis of the money issue in the Cooper case is not just incomplete but wrong, juvenile and stupid. You seem to be a person with real personal issue -

I discovered that the money itself is covered with bacteria.... the sand is therefore irrelevent. Really? That will come as news to the scientific community. What pickup truck did yous get you education in? Any advice on Tylenol and vaccines ? I think you and Palmer and Fred Mopar are about the only humans on Earth that actually claim the money got its shape by rolling on the bottom of a river! Are all candy bars made by tumbling them in a river? ? You have crossed the line to humor and insanity!

*Regarding the fact that the money itself was remarkably well preserved, Professor PALMER advised that sand is sterile, and in nature, is probably the best preservative of any soil. (One reason is the exposure of beach sand to UV). This could also be the reason that the rubber bands were still in place around the money, although they were badly deteriorated. This would also lend credence to the fact that the money had been deposited in sand, the major portion of time since it was lost. The money would have lasted no more than a year in nature unless protected. Palmer added that fragments of the money could have been washed anywhere down stream in the Columbia, but he doubted that any additional money found would be as well preserved unless it had been deposited in an upper layer of sand. .................................................................................................................... Is beach sand sterile - No, beach sand is not sterile; it contains a vast number of microorganisms, including various types of bacteria, viruses, fungi, and parasites. Many of these microbes can be pathogenic to humans and can cause infections or illnesses through contact, particularly if you have cuts or other breaks in your skin, or if ingested. Why beach sand isn't sterile: Beach sand serves as a natural habitat for a diverse range of microbes that thrive in the near-marine environment. Contaminants such as fecal bacteria from animal and human waste can reach the sand via water or direct spread. The sand itself can act as a reservoir, supporting the persistence and even multiplication of certain microbes, even when water quality tests are clean. The microbial story of the Cooper money was never explored. Microbial tests have routinely been done in the public areas of the Columbia for decades, testing for microbial blooms, hazardous materials, and agricultural contamination. Public records and yearly test results are available. The Cooper money microbial profile fits somewhere in yearly microbial water data, ... its another clock that has not been consulted. The FBI Lab probably lacked the resources and the request to look for a comparison in order to date the Ingram find.

Are you including Soderlind in this 'uncertainty' ? What is the basis for the NWA search map ? Are you saying no one connected oscillations and the pressure events until after the plane had landed at Reno ? What accounts for the fact H was already in a helo headed north to search near Merwin-Longview ?

It could be people are confused by what you mean by PATH. General word, direction, Airway, technical sense ... ?

Woah! ? ? ? .....

What is Amerman saying? Is he now saying he wasnt even involved with 305 until .... 8:13 ! after Cooper had bailed ?

Questions: how long before Cooper is going to know if he has a working chute? 30 seconds? Less? Longer? How long before Cooper is going to know where he is at ?