Lucky...

So Jesus is a Capitalist monopolistic fuck then.

Hoo boy, I totally agree. And I better mention it's a quote from Satan/John Milton's soliloquy (delivered by Al Pacino) in Devil's Advocate. Plagiarist.

As well it fucks up their short earth joke theory, as 10k years can't imagine 65M years.

What a joke, hear what this group of criminals we call the presidentia admin is saying? The WH aids can testify in private and not under oath, so IOW's, hear say everthing. They must have learned that wen you lie, lie not under oath. None the less, they are full ofshit if they want it all in closed session. Is it more apparent than how woh illicit the chimp and friends are? SO now Bush says there will be an all-out war over this if the Dems push it? Where was he when the Repug scum pushed the Lewinsky scandal? Welcome to your own nightmare, scumbag Bush.

Exactly, don't misunderestimate him. Hell, he can't lie; he can't speak English Uh...... WMD's for a starter

Nah, this is the same conflict they've been having for decades... hate Jews, prey to Alah. I'm not sure how long the Suni-Shia conflict has been present, but they war cause they wanna, stupid fuckers intervein as if they're gonna stop any time soon..... just ask Russia with Afghanistan.

Yes, the black helicopter over house is busy guiding your computer now.

OK, start with this: http://www.cedarcomm.com/~stevelm1/usdebt.htm Give me your take as to the trend here. We won't call names, let's see your common sensical and reasonable process here.

You gotta be fucking joking, the Repugs, esp this POS is the most secretive ever and you wanna blame the left. Egads

After reading that neo-con horseshit I have the undeniable urge to go make out with Ann Coulter. Now I see why neo-cons are always so angry, they have to enjoy treash like her. Ikkkkkkkkkk

Look, I take all of this stuff with a grain of salt. "Studies" of conservatives have been posted here and I take them the same but, you don't have to have such a thin skin now do you? Just advertise it as neo-con rhetoric and not a study.

Not the ones in Canada. Here they're nothing more than socialist lemmings. Scoialist lemmings vs crazed psycho Nazi fucks, .... grass greener..... don;t feel to fucked over, I'll trade ours for yours - you can keep your weather.

And neo-cons have feet fer running from issues

I suspect that at the core of neo-con “thinking” is the same kind of pathology that characterizes other mental disorders, i.e., a glitch in the brain that produces “feelings” and behavior over which liberals have no control. Fixed it for ya Are ya bored? Instead of talking about foolish things like how the differing ideolgies have impacted us, you do intelligent stuff like promising a study, then delivering neo-con psychobabble rant, calling libs pathologically fucked. If you want to talk debt, war, privacy and other meaningless stuff, start a thread, until then wecan enjoy this rhetoric.

For once I totally agree with you

I know a large group of southern democrats who believe in these points and also believe in fiscal responsibility. These were the Yellow Dog Dems who put the 3 stooges into office, then they helped to shitcan the garbage bac out this last Nov. Question is, will they vote for a Hillary or an Obama?

1) Firearms including pistols and automatic weapons should be legal in the UK. The Desm are slightly more against firearms that the Repubs, so don't act as if 1 is for; 1 is against. The NRA pulled GHW bush's card for his acts against firearms, GW Bush said he would sign the AW Ban if Congress passed it on, they didn't. 2) Human increase of CO2 has nothing at all to do with global warming, its down to the sunspots. Most scientists believe that fuels have aggravated the issue, to what degree they disagree upon. I think only a ____ would think there is zero complicity, but it could be negligible. I think it is actually formidible, but just as Jebus, it's all a theory. But your point is that you believe as Repubs believe, but remember, they do so out of greed/apathy. 3) I belive in God. Many Dems/ libs believe that way, but organized religion wants the neo-con right to prevail. Just as lib does not necc = Dem, belief in God doesn't necc = religious. So the types to believe in religion and want the right to prevail can be different than the types who simply belive in God. 4) Although I was against the war in Iraq initially I am now against pulling troops out. Are you simply confused? What was your motive to not want us in Iraq then, and why do you think we should not leave? Pls don't say simple cliche's like "Terrorism" and the sort, be comprehensive; I will read it. 5) I support the increase in US troop levels in Iraq to attempt to quench the violence. Is it that you just want it to end so increasing numbers will expedite it? Why is it that you think a militay solution will work when it has not to this point, yet a political solution won;t work. My thinking is that you have had a paradigm shift and that somethinghappened to you, perhaps a tax increase or something to make you think that American Republicanism is the best way. Remember, if you become a Republican ideologically, you have to deny logical debate and graphs of the debt. QUESTION: Do you think giving masses of $$$ to the rich and tax breaks as well is the best way to manage a government? As well as the result being astronomical debt rendering teh $$$ worth much less and ultimately going to crash teh $$$. So do you fiscally agree with the Repoubs as well? Perhaps you aren't as much of a Repub as you might think.

Yep, jion the shrinking number of those thinkers..... as in the Repubs and their ideologies have been voted out of power and nothing says that it won't continue in 08. Oh God help us all, what ideals that are Democratic do you align with? I know it's hard to agree with the neo-con party now, but quit your denial.

Right, but as the ideologies change, the care and distribution change, which is a direct reflection of the level of hmanity these ideologies reflect.

So what do you propose? Should there be a 'salary cap'? Should there be a law that anyone that makes more then a million dollars a year should then have all that money over a million distributed to everyone else? How about univeral care and better social programs. Also, college tuition paid, as California used to do. Education and health care should be encouraged and provided. And the quality of the education and health care goes to shit. Bottom line you get what you pay for. Right, and the neo-Repugs have writtenthe rules to benefit them, so the poor have gone to shit..... and then the Repugs wonder why all teh crime????? You really do get wht you pay for and the Repugs have said fuck off to the lower classes and they ahev gone to shit, so I agree with you. By your statement you have demonstrated that you want fewer people to get better care, fuck the masses.

I think it's clearly possible to be amused and apathetic simultaneously. you just have to practice And have no conscience..... I don't want to get into religion for now. Other than the whole amused/apathetic thing, anyway. I understand Ann Coulter is joining a union to pardon Scooter Libby in favor of global warming cleanup activities requiring RSLs to only be disconnected in an emergency where GTA gets a date to the movies where they play everyone's favorite TV themesong from robin hood. But no one cares as they are apathetic in how guns can stop booing at college football games where the players aren't allowed to vote unless a cop stops at the wrong address and raises his hands to released methane into the ozone from a hybrid car operated by Northwest airlines' pilots and one small Iranian girl. So we have more than 1 ultimate Republican pesticide, and I thought it was just the debt mess the Repugs are easily at least 75% responsible for, now I see corporate greed causes them to run, spin, anthing but answer the questions...... Repugs = party of spin and misdirection.

Beats having to actually answer the issue.

So if Clinton should not have, but did, then Bush pardoning one if his close fall guys is fair tit/tat? The 2 are seperate issues and dragging other issues into it only shows the desperation teh right has for covering for their own. Clinton and Regan pardoned shitloads, GHW Bush did not, but let's face it, GHW Bush has far more character tan his son, so it will be a fre-for-all to those who corrupted for Bush on Jan 20, 2009..... probably even Shilling.

Neither my fault, problem, or responsibility to alleviate. Few people fully realise how much the relative wealth of our western nations is built on the poverty of the rest of the world. The system may not be your fault, but you certainly do take full advantage of it. And not only have no remorse, but actually think it's funny is some cases..... apathy at best What's the alternative? Only purchase goods for which the labor is paid what you interpret to be a reasonable wage? Lie awake at night obsessing about the injustice of it all? Quit voting for the scum that defends the rights of the rich and vote for those who advantage the poor via social help. Is that so difficult?