SkyDekker
-
Content
21,691 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
96 -
Feedback
0% -
Country
Canada
Everything posted by SkyDekker
-
I know you are so incredibly biased that all your posts related to politics are becoming very predictable.
-
Dude, you need to learn how to read. Actually read the letters that make the words, not read what you think people are saying.
-
What was that again about ESL and Lenscrafters?
-
Maybe this time Mr. Bush can get a majority of people to vote for him
-
That can't be Canadian, we would ahve had a moose pulling it Sorry, can't tell you the plural of moose, it is a closely guarded state secret.
-
Oops my bad. To Juansky: I already wear contacts, guess I'll have to get them checked
-
That be great, that way I can look up Purity of Blood and some of the other racist BS you like to post
-
Ooops, I forgot, some people here seem to think that because you are not American, you are not really allowed to post anything
-
It is supposed to be my nick in binary. But used one of those online binary translators, so who knows if it is even close to correct..
-
I am going to have to call bullshit on that. The polls don't indicate who is going to win the election. They can, and in my opinion in this case do, show trends over time. Hence, the previous polls are shown as well to give you that trend. It clearly shows that Bush's support is slipping and actually at its lowest point since he became president. I really am not sure what that has to do with bashing?
-
This was emailed to me yesterday, thought some of you guys may enjoy this:
-
Just for those claiming that the polls show bush in the lead, may want to take a look at this web site: http://www.pollingreport.com/wh04gen.htm Though it is probably just a lefty, communist piece of shit website It is very close when asking the question between Bush and Kerry. Bush's approval rating is definitely slipping. Eventhough there is a very vocal group of people apologizing for this man on this site, it would seem many Americans are waking up and starting to ask some questions. Thankfully though I do not live in a country where one votes for a president just because the other candidate is more fucked up.
-
Come on the minority of people voted for him.....leave it alone
-
Okay, that I understand. Val made a statement that specific oral consent had to be provided or it would be considered rape in certain states. That is really what I was replying to.
-
Or Bush should not have invaded Iraq under false pretences and should have kept his focus on AQ and OBL. But then as Kallend has already pointed out, why would he, OBL is not important anymore to the US.
-
You are right, that is why I am asking questions. Specially when it pertains to situations where it is considered rape just because she did not say yes. I think rape is despicable, from the story on the first post of this thread, I have a hard time telling myself that is rape.
-
Ahh, so really your standards change depending on the person and their beliefs. Sort of like: If a republican says it....good, if a democrat says it....bad
-
Funny, you have a different standard for President Bush. You seem to be quite happy with believing him without proof. Funny thing is, he sent thousands of people to their graves. I am just having a discussion with you.
-
You know what, this has been discussed quite a few times before. It is a little rediculous to have discussion where to only counter argument is: get me some proof. If you want to forget certain details to feel better about Bush, it really doesn't affect me. Personally, I like to live in reality. So far it was not an unlawful order. Like I stated before, I think that a call to war has a higher burdon of proof than normal affairs. That statement just doesn't make any sense.
-
So, lets say you meet this girl in a bar and you hit it off. Lets say we end up at her place and have a couple more drinks, at which point I relay that I just love it when a woman just kneels in front of me and gives me a BJ. 10 minutes later, she just kneels down, pulls down my zipper and gives me a BJ. Does this mean I raped her? She never verbaly stated: yes I want to have sex with you.
-
So, how about the part where they told him that his intelligence on the purchase of nuclear materials was completely wrong, yet he still used it in his state of the union address? What do you call that? And he is the CIC is he not? Did you spend your time in the military trying to get as far as remotely possible from any type of active duty? Or you were just never asked to serve in active duty? There is a big difference there, to me anyways.
-
Certainly not on a witch hunt, just asking for some proof. Like, what was discussed in those energy policy meetings Ohhh, that's right Bush refuses to release them. It is not a witch hunt. A guy who has the power to lead his country into war resulting in a (just american) death tol over 600, should be helt to a higher standard of proof. I get from you that you think he should be allowed to do whatever he wants until someone proves he was wrong.
-
No I don't, I do have a perception to go on. His record as governor and the death penalty for one. Secondly, he sent his country into war based on questionable intelligence. (I'll leave it at that, I think he went to war to make money, but that is beside the point) He is not afraid to get people to kill for him or in his name. It is interesting that he has that attitude, eventhough he made as sure as possible that he himself would never have to kill anyone.
-
Yes, why do you follow this man without even questioning anything?
-
What I really don't understand is why not more people have questions about Bush? How come so many people just blindly follow him and have no doubts? There are so many questions and so many things bush is hiding, yet they just agree and follow. I don't understand that. Please don't say Clinton and his supporters were worse...because that really makes no sense. PS. Kallen this was not directed at you, just meant in general.
