Andy9o8

http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/04/03/17584491-first-amendment-doesnt-apply-here-nc-lawmakers-push-bill-for-state-religion?lite http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickungar/2013/04/03/north-carolina-lawmakers-introduce-law-to-establish-an-official-state-religion/

Not related Is so.

I say again, the GOP is hemorrhaging women's votes with this ignoramus shit. Women who look at Sanford are not going to see his fiscal conservatism; they're going to identify with his betrayed wife. They will look at her and say "There but for the grace of God go I." They will be disgusted by him, and by the stooges who put him on the ballot; and after smiling sweetly at their fathers and husbands, they will register that disgust in the privacy of the voting booth. They're also hemorrhaging votes of self-respecting conservative men like you, and this is why.

He's just not going to pay attention. Not to Jindal, not to you.

I haven't seen anyone's picture so widely used as an icon of evil since .... I'm gonna say it .... Hitler's! Yeah, Republicans, keep it up. And keep wondering why fewer and fewer women are voting with you. Even your wives and daughters. Who black men want to... well, that's another discussion.

Still seems higher than giraffe pussy, to me anyway. But what do I know... Malvo and Muhammad were tried between 2003 and 2006. As an aside, the overall costs of their defenses, given the particular complexity of their cases (and many expenses were non-attorney, such as investigators and forensic experts, were unusually expensive - so much so that cherry-picking their cases as "representative examples" amounts basically to either laziness or intellectual dishonesty. Anyhow, here's an ABA state-by-state survey of typical attorney fees in capital cases published in 2003, the relevant time period. http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/migrated/legalservices/downloads/sclaid/indigentdefense/compensationratescapital2003.authcheckdam.pdf As you can see, virtually all of the rates were below (some WELL below) $99 per hour. 10 years later, the overall national rates are a little bit higher, but not by very much in very many states. Not apropos of anyone in particular, be wary of random twits with nothing better to do than troll by making shit up.

No, he didn't.

Ok I will mark you down as wanting another near depresion cycle soon I would argue that one of the major causes of this near-depression is the post-9/11 military spending without the revenues to pay for it.

That, by the way, is one of the top 2 or 3 reasons why Geo. H.W. Bush lost reelection to Clinton in '92.

I'd rather piss away good money at home than in Afghanistan.

Not if he's a fucking pig. For starters, no women will vote for someone like that. Hello??- they're half the electorate. As it should be, but the Dems elect fucking pigs every cycle But Dems don't hold themselves out as moral Puritans. We just grab your guns, take your shit and give it to wetbacks and welfare queens.

Not if he's a fucking pig. For starters, no women will vote for someone like that. Hello??- they're half the electorate. Men can compartmentalize and stomach voting for someone like that. Women generally cannot.

The point being, Marc, is not to paint YOU with any brush; it's that the GOP political leadership is betraying ordinary conservative citizens like YOU by doing this shit. Your team needs a new front office, a new manager and a new coaching staff - or be prepared to lose a lot of games.

God, I love that man.

But Jerry and I are in here for fun, and we have fun with each other while doing it. Wait, that's not what I meant. Not that there's anything wrong with that.

My point exactly. Don't be like those fools playing basketball with tattoos all up and down their arms and shoulders. How about white-trash bikers the same age with tattoos all up and down their arms and shoulders? Oops, wrong forum.

This, too, is what Bobby Jindal was talking about when he said to stop being "the party of stupid". You can't claim to be the party of social conservatism, morality and family values, and still keep doing this shit, too - and win a whole lot of elections. Not any more. Them days is over. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-22010771

They died as the ultimate and predictable result of all that in-breeding you're so hot on. So much for your theories of racial purity.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!! Hoo-boy, does Mommy's little boy need an enema.

Testify, brother. some might argue that they never 'needed' it in the first place, they just 'got it'. some might also argue that money may have stifled the most efficient growth of that very industry or a better industry that never came to be other might argue the opposite apparently and that a government 'kick start' is the greatest thing since the wheel and nothing ever really happens without it I suppose the test is whether you think Tang is a tasty drink or not. Clearly, I'm conflicted as a result. You and I are referring to different industries, Bill. I'm talking about the military industry, where government heaps trillions of largesse upon contractors like Grumman, Northrup, McDonnell-Douglas, etc. You, on the other hand, are referring to the space program, where gover...... Never mind. ===================================== OK, all kidding aside, I'm very much in favor of the civilian space program, because I do believe that the net-net of it advances human development. I know, some drink the kool-aid; I drank the Tang. I'm also no fool when it comes to genuine needs for national defense and security, and SOME need to project SOME power overseas to that end. I just think we can do it quite well with about, oh, 60% of the treasure and blood that we're actually spending (and diverting) for it. IOW, about 40% of the military (and even more of the human) expenditure between 1946 and today has been (and still is being) criminally misspent.

On a serious note, if that's the case, remember to dive down, and watch the damn tail.

Testify, brother.

Did you buy a TV without a remote control? Don't judge - a discount is a discount.

The pols score is not lost on me It's not a score; it's a verb.

Title? Keep it simple. Here's my vote: Politicians 69, Citizens 0.