jakee

Oh yeah. Contiguous mainland Russia shares one border with Finland and another with North Korea. The country is not homogenous.

How many city centres have massive chemical warehouses in them?

On a positive note, I was impressed by the interviewer. Was able to keep on point when Trump wandered off on his many tangents, saw through most of the bullshit but never got bogged down or hostile when it was clear an answer wasn’t coming. I think the one big thing he missed was Trump trying to have his cake and eat it on the death rate. On one hand insisting that the US only has more confirmed cases because they test more, and on the other hand using deaths per confirmed case as the metric to show the US is doing well. Should have made him pick one.

And they want to be important. Remember that Ron no longer describes Q as a method for the military to disseminate information to him, but as an intelligence gathering operation where the military is crowdsourcing information FROM Ron and his friends. He’s not a Q follower, but an active participant in the right wing Deep State plot against the libs.

Yeah, but only because it’s Beirut. Warehouses catch fire and chemical factories and refineries explode all over the world with reasonable frequency and no one wonders about terrorism.

It’s funny in this case that you think the side with the reasonable position would be screaming and the irrational hypocrites would simply be ‘trying to use it’.

Of course it’s not all, but it’s the easiest and funniest one. How do you manage to get through the day with no sense of humour? The meaningful thing is that the guy lured kids into spending huge amounts of money at his fake university while subjecting then to ridiculously strict lifestyle controls in service of a ‘morality’ he can’t be bothered to remotely follow himself.

Yo is an old English word and its modern use was initially popularised by white people.

Kareen Abdul Jabbar? My dad says she doesn’t even run down court.

I think he demands Arby’s?

Now that is impossible to argue with. Because... what?

How is it misinterpreting when someone when someone simply has a different opinion than you? Are you arrogant enough to think any opinion counter to yours must be a fundamental misunderstanding? That's a rhetorical question by the way, and the answer is yes you are - so you shouldn't offer any other answer. How does demonstrating the the question can be answered supposed to help show that the question shouldn't be answered? The answer is of course it doesn't, that's absurd. And that's the only possible answer, because this question is also rhetorical. By the way, what do you think it demonstrates that you've answered 5 rhetorical questions including your own in order to advance your claim that rhetorical questions should not be answered? I'd say it shows rank hypocrisy and a fundamental lack of self awareness. But of course if you think differently then you won't say so.

You recognise questions that shouldn't be answered by seeing that someone has tried answering them? Do you really think it works that way?

Why are you answering all the rhetorical questions in this thread?

Of course - answering a question is obviously the clearest way to demonstrate that it is a question which is not supposed to be answered.

You don't recognise a rhetorical question when you read it or write it, I see.

Ummmmm..... you answered it too. Does that mean you don't recognise a rhetorical question when you write it?

So it is a stretch to think that Clinton is as guilty as Trump? Cool. I must say I'm surprised to see you being so reasonable.

To answer your question, no. And the rest of us have you.

For accuracy in holding you to account? Happy to share, tbh.

That doesn't make any sense. I'm not going to quote your entire essay in order to address a specific part of it, why would I? Further, nothing you said in that post contradicts what I said about your other posts. Just because you made a real effort to sound reasonable this time it doesn't mean the hysteria of your other posts ceases to exist. Did I say that? I dunno, maybe. Turtle picks fights with everyone he thinks is on the left no matter how much he has to contradict the positions he otherwise claims to hold, you can't deny that. Anyway, I don't see the relevance. It was also part of an oppressive dictatorship in a nation ripe for violent revolution. No matter how much Trump is trying to undermine the democratic institutions of the US I really don't think the same applies. No matter how much you guys like your end times prophecies there is absolutely no reason to think you're about to see SHTF. Lol, there you go. How does that fit with you claiming I'm misrepresenting your desire to be part of a victimised class? Give me a break

Then why do you write the things you write? Why do you misrepresent what people say and bend logic to breaking point to claim you're going to be the victim of a coming genocide when in reality you're part of the firmly entrenched ruling class? Hell, do you not also claim, when it suits you, that Christianity and religion in general is actually growing in popularity? They need to be careful of it because it's bollocks, not because it might come true. You seem to base your faith on the idea that you have to take strength from it in the face constant attack and persecution just like all of the christians who came before you - and none of that is true.

Fixed it for you.

That sentence doesn't mean what you think it does.

Judgig by the number of women who have accused him of grabbing them by the pussy it means he was boasting and bragging about something he does.