
jakee
Members-
Content
24,931 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
74 -
Feedback
0%
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Dropzones
Gear
Articles
Fatalities
Stolen
Indoor
Help
Downloads
Gallery
Blogs
Store
Videos
Classifieds
Everything posted by jakee
-
That is simply a lie.
-
Why? The synopsis of that ‘book’ shows it has the exact opposite goal as the person in the video you posted. It is similar in that it also has absolutely no place in a thread about left wing hypocrisy, though.
-
It is absolutely impossible to draw that conclusion from what he said.
-
So first, this person is advocating for a situation where pedophiles do NOT have to hide that they are attracted to children. That's the opposite of your definition above. Second, if you think that what 'the left' is saying about pedophilia is the same as what they are saying about trans people that's the opposite of the real definition of hypocrisy. So, AGAIN, why did you post this in a thread about left wing hypocrisy?
-
You think 'the whole bathroom thing' is equivalent to pedophilia? Ok. I mean, wow! But ok. So given that you think it's all the same kind of consistent, solid left wing thinking, I'll still need you to explain why you put it in this thread. Specifically how it relates to the first word of the thread title.
-
Why would you want to do that?
-
It's not coming from any think tank. It's coming from a TED talk by a medical student. Please explain how you think it fits into this thread?
-
It was said that what would never happen?
-
Oh sure, that narrows it down.
-
Indeed. And given that the system of checks would need to be cobbled together very quickly experience tells us two things are likely. First, the bureaucracy will end of costing more than the small amount of claims by chancers willing to give up a steady job for a temporary unemployment increase. Secondly the system will be overly sensitive and rigidly demanding and will again deny coverage to more legitimate claimants than illegitimate ones it uncovers. I don’t think any of that will remotely bother the American right though, where punishing the undeserving is the single most important goal of any benefits reform.
-
You know what the word “news” means, right?
-
Hey Ron, remember when you said you liked OANN because they only offered facts instead of opinions? How's that going for you?
-
There goes your goldfish memory again. Seriously, less than a day and a handful of posts since you started the personal discussion and you think I did it. You really, really, really need to see a doctor.
-
Only one party has pursued a national statistically driven project to push it as a central election strategy, and as a result only one party holds a large advantage in the case of a 50-50 voter split.
-
Your head is so strange. First, this is a thread where you decided to disagree with what I said, not the other way around - so at best the point is irrelevant. Second, think of all the insane things you've posted over the last few years just so you could oppose the left. You spent days and days insisting that what Trump said about treating people with disinfectant and UV was both correct and helpful and days more insisting that the media had lied about what he said when they were reporting on his exact words. That behaviour, among many other examples, makes no sense whatsoever unless you are determined to disagree with the left on every topic, all the time.
-
Lol. Last time you tried that line was when you were saying Trump had given away intel by saying Kim was still alive and I disagreed. Tell me, did you then see any reporting from anyone at all accusing Trump of giving away intel? When it's actually happened in the past the media have been all over him, this time zip. Looks like I was right to defend Trump against your accusation that time, wouldn't you say? Ultimately you're the guy who's admitted posting against whatever the left says in spite of whether or not you believe it, and assuming that people are doing the same to you is a projection.
-
In Beirut. That's exactly what I said.
-
But surely you are arguing that those deaths don't matter? If you have a winning lottery ticket, the chances are that you will be the only person queueing up to hand it in. If you go to vote, chances are you'll be queueing up with a lot of other people waiting to vote. If Covid deaths are important and if social distancing is important then mail in ballots are more important than mail in lottery tickets
-
Lol, what a pointless douchebag. I can 100% confirm that English speakers in England, the land of English, do not say Thighland.
-
What are you talking about? How is that at all relevant to the conversation?
-
What, exactly, is gaming the system and going outside the spirit of the constitution?
-
Lol. How many people in your district want to vote, and how many people in your district do you think would win the lottery jackpot on the same day you win the lottery jackpot?
-
So what? Seriously, what is your point, and how does it apply to any non-lottery winning scenario?
-
And if that blew up would you assume it was terrorism, or a natural consequence of storing vast amounts of unstable explosives for years next to a town centre?