brenthutch

Members
  • Content

    11,005
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    37
  • Feedback

    0%

Everything posted by brenthutch

  1. But it was against the law to bring that gun into California. Shouldn’t the law have stopped that?
  2. California doesn’t have sensible gun laws?
  3. Tesla killer https://electrek.co/2019/07/08/porsche-taycan-goodwood-racetrack/
  4. There is a big difference between letting a company keep some more of its hard earned cash and government handouts.
  5. https://www.accountingtools.com/articles/2017/5/15/depletion-method
  6. You obviously didn’t take accounting in college.
  7. “According to the EIA in 2016, the most recent year for which complete data is available, the federal government spent just shy of $14 billion in energy subsidies and support. Subsidies for renewable energy totaled $6.682 billion, while those for fossil energy totaled a mere $489 million.” https://www.insidesources.com/us-still-subsidizing-renewable-energy-to-the-tune-of-nearly-7-billion/
  8. And that is why we get our solar panels from Malaysia, China, South Korea and Vietnam.
  9. A paltry sum when compared to the $36 billion collected by just the Federal government on just road fuel taxes. BTW nice job of singling out export coal, when I said fossil fuels as a whole.
  10. As it stands with the "renewable sector" being a $200bn revenue US industry and a failure rate on govt loans being just 2.7% (about half of the private sector) and those subsidies being primarily in the form of tax breaks which are expiring with almost no opposition you simply can't ask for a better outcome in how the US is addressing the roll of the energy sector in climate change. The "but subsidies" argument simply doesn't hold water and besides, tax breaks are what conservatives almost categorically use as a tool to give an industry and the economy a bump."" Most renewable tax credits expire in 2022. Either you are being purposely obtuse or you just don’t get it. Let’s take this one step at a time. Please compare the amount of tax revenue received by federal and state governments from fossil fuels to the tax revenue provided by renewables.
  11. https://www.scienceunderattack.com/blog/2019/6/17/no-evidence-that-climate-change-causes-weather-extremes-1-drought-28 https://www.scienceunderattack.com/blog/2019/7/1/no-evidence-that-climate-change-causes-weather-extremes-2-floods-29 https://www.scienceunderattack.com/blog/2019/7/15/no-evidence-that-climate-change-causes-weather-extremes-3-hurricanes-30 https://www.scienceunderattack.com/blog/2019/7/29/no-evidence-that-climate-change-causes-weather-extremes-4-tornadoes-31 Facts for breakfast!
  12. I am for high density energy production, which has a smaller footprint than wind and large scale solar and their accompanying distribution web which occupy massive swaths of land.
  13. The area of a country under drought conditions http://mentalfloss.com/article/500485/most-us-experiencing-record-low-drought-levels
  14. Bill, just how does the electricity get from the windmill to the end user?
  15. How do you explain below average temperature in the US = record low drought?
  16. We have: Atlantic Multi decadal oscillation, Dansgaard-Oeschger cycle, Pacific decadal oscillation, Milankovitch cycles, ElNino, LaNina, not to mention solar cycles and their interactions with cosmic rays and cloud cover. It is the interplay between these natural cycles that drive global climate. let me be clear, I do agree that CO2 has SOME impact on global climate especially at lower concentrations. However, since physics tells us that the greenhouse effect of CO2 drops off logarithmically, I think the labeling of CO2 as a globe destroying poison requiring trillions of dollars to battle is foolish.
  17. “Higher temps cause droughts. Basic earth science” BillV
  18. The spectacular failure of CO2 based climate models does. If they didn’t predict the pause they can’t explain the cause.