promise5

Repressed Being to believe a person is all of these. No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

Obsessed No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

Actually I'll say the crews I work with are great. They really watch what they say and the language they use. I have more self appointed uncles, older brothers and dads then a person could want but I love them all. No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

That just isn't right!!! Crap!! I'm beginning to realize there are sayings I just don't need to know the definition to. No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

Circle jerk? No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

Creep! No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

I'll post as soon as I run across one. No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

I thought about it. But there has to be other sayings people just don't get. No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

Just wondering. No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

I've written a letter to my representatives taking about the registry and the concerns that were brought up I just don't feel that's my battle. I'll help and support anyone that feels it's theirs. Mine is supporting and addressing the issue of sex offenders as TI's. And advocating for those that have been effected by the sex crimes offenders have committed. No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

I am!!! No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

*** When did you redefine sex offender to only be child molestation or rape?[/ Well I don't see someone as peeing in public or streaking as a sex offender. But if you want to pick my statement apart go ahead. I'm sure there are MANY scenarios/cases that I haven't covered by choosing only those two. And I'm sure there are those that want to take the time to go through each one by one. Then sit back and say how horrible it would be if anyone tried to bring this forward. If you feel so strongly against it do your research (detailed) and then present it to the USPA,FAA and any other governing department that you think you should. But, don't just sit and do nothing. No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

I'll rephrase it once more, - gets a TI rating - commits a sexual crime - pleads guilty, gets 3 months in prison, 9 months suspended, ends up on sexual offender registry - not uncurrent enough to involve USPA, mfgtr examiner, another TI So why should the mfgtr examiner/USPA be responsible for this scenario. Makes much more sense for the DZ to do the screening. In THAT scenario then the DZ would make sense. Having the USPA take a stand and them also encouraging DZ owners to take the same in cases like you offered as a scenario. But, crap I hope someone that has committed rape/child molestation doesn't just get 3 months. But yeah in the real world it happens I'm sure. No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

Phone posting. No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

ROFLING And I can't even see if you posted something that requires a cursor. No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

Ok I'll admit, if I saw either you or OW6 I would just pull over. Anybody else is fair game. No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

Just going to jump and cover a couple things from several posts. I don't think the FAA really gives a dang about wether a Sex Offender is a TI or not. I also think it's a huge level of bureaucracy that doesn't need to be involved in the sport. Why not have an organization that cares about the sport and involved in it take the stand of not certifying sex offenders. Yes there are mistakes in records. I understand that. I'm also very aware that " corrupting the morals of a child" is VERY different from sexually abusing that child for 5 years or more. Big difference between the two. That's why I do my research. But I hope I understand the point you made. Lol the fantasy thing. Sorry but a " rape" fantasy is not really a rape scenario. Openly discussed this with a few women about it. They still maintain a level of control by having "safe" words agreed upon with a partner they trust. Big difference between that and what "rape" actually is. No control,no safe words, no trust and no willingness to participate. Just to name a few things. When the issue came up I wanted to understand and have the women that thought it was the same understand the differences. No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

So where would that come into play considering a sex offender? No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

Do they let you drive the firetruck or the ambulance? Both Well the support truck. They only let me drive the one big truck maybe once and that was slowly through part of town. Each guy has a truck he considered his "baby " and doesn't let others drive it. So I should be thankful they have let me. No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

Forgive my ignorance. What kind of physical is needed for a TI certification? No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

I'll race ya! Ha!! Is just run you over! No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

Simple out of curiosity, why do all women think they are good drivers and/or think they are always right when they drive? Oh crud I'm a horrible driver!! I'll admit it!! No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

True on law. Neither is trying to get oranges to sound like gullible. No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

This instructor doesn't work at a DZ? He wouldn't know the policy of not allowing sex offenders to be registered ? So there isn't an application that asks if the person applying has been convicted of a felony? If the guy checks no then fine once it's found out he lied it will go from there. If the guy checks yes and then yes the instructor I hope would then pass on taking this person back or refer him to the DZ owner etc. Very simple. No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.

If he's signing off on a TI and that TI is a sex offender and he knows it. Yes he would be held accountable. No matter how slowly you say oranges it never sounds like gullible. Believe me I tried.