To be clear,, I don't care what Ryan's opinions are, in fact I prefer he has things messed up, those people that just accept his narratives will find out eventually that they have been played.
This is not about a difference of opinion.
He crossed the line when he lied about me and lied about Hahneman to discredit me..
and he does it over and over... Just one example.. To discredit me, he claimed I left the DZ because of a post, he just made it up, I left for a few weeks when my step-brother suddenly died.
I have posted tons of evidence here refuting his personal theories,, his response is twofold, try to discredit me and ignore the evidence.
This is pure lunacy.. Ryan does not use the scientific method. He has inverted it using opinions to reject an hypothesis...
"I feel that I must add that this one reason that I actually appreciate current Cooper enthusiasts like Ryan Burns. I think that their approach is more fact-delineating to the point that it reminds me of aligning more to a scientific method of research."
For example,,
This is how Ryan sells his opinion as fact,, masked in misinformation. These points sound convincing but they do not support his claim.
Ryan claimed Cooper jumped at Orchards. No evidence for that.
He claimed that is the consensus now. A consensus with his FB buddies.
He claimed Anderson noted a significant delay from oscillations to bump. False, Anderson was referring to the call, the bump was "abrupt".
He claimed the FBI now believes Cooper jumped at Orchards. False, the FBI never made that claim, Ryan was referring to Larry Carr's current opinion, he is no longer FBI and does not speak for them. Larry also believes Cooper died in the jump.
Cooper did not jump at Orchards but if you weren't knowledgeable about the case you'd just accept it. Ryan would have called me biased but the LZ doesn't infer a suspect.