Leaderboard

The Scotts have realized Trump can no longer enter Scotland.

I saw a whole lot of LinkedIn connections referring to the pro-Palestine protests on university campuses a while back as 'pro-Hamas'....I guess some people are allergic to nuance.

True. As in the Royal we here on this platform.

It is that. It's really simple. Take action against kids or threaten action against kids - go to jail. Think about stuff in your head and don't act on it - don't go to jail. It's true for everything, not just things that have to do with kids. I'm glad you're not in charge of anything. We have enough thought police as it is.

That was a Royal we.

He's having a hard time with it because HE WANTS TO BE OFFENDED. So he makes up shit that offends him, and then argues about it. The fact that it has NOTHING to do with reality doesn't matter. It's a standard propaganda technique. Very similar to what Brent does with EVs. Make up or deliberately misunderstand something, then argue against it.

New episode out now! DB Cooper had a special set of skills with my good friend Brandon Arnold. https://thecoopervortex.podbean.com/e/db-cooper-had-a-special-set-of-skills-brandon-arnold/

Fond memories of time spent in the back of the Vista Cruiser... Yeah, you'd have a pretty good handle on my motivations. Having said that, as a teenager I was a Boy Scout and took the Scout Law seriously. Still do. I'm largely fine with people who disagree with me but are sincere. I have no time for the dishonest, whether or not they appear to be on my side of an issue.

"Did you get the Radio Announcer job?" "N- n- n- no, they di- di- di- didn't hire me 'cause I'm Je- Je- Je- Jewish." Hillary Clinton is beneath contempt, and being female has nothing to do with it. When she 'stood by her man' in an interview in which he responded to questions regarding infidelity with references to 'rough patches' in any marriage, it told me everything I needed to know about her, that she was every bit as loathsome as him. She has since done everything to support that assessment. Trump blurts out whatever crosses his mind, without consideration for what might or might not be the 'facts.' Since truth is but an abstract concept to him, calling him a liar is giving him too much credit. HRC, OTOH, would appear to know the difference when she puts forth an endless stream of self-serving falsehoods. When I vote, I don't take race or sex into account - unless the candidate makes it an issue. If someone says 'vote for me because I'm a straight white male' or 'vote for me because I'm black and bisexual,' they've just lost my vote either way. If they say 'vote for me because I'm the most dedicated and competent candidate, and I have coherent plans to address the key issues about which you are concerned,' I couldn't care less what are their demographic particulars. It concerns me that your priority appears to be more who a candidate is than what are their agenda. Your right, I suppose.

I'm not a rigger, but I think the simple answer is that in general, one side is enough and both could invite a problem. In an of it's self, an RSL is simple and has saved many lives. Not having it as led to deaths.

Well Duh. A woman in a position of power over a uneducated white man. How more oppressive can you get. Hold my beer while I check her e-mails for the evidence.