Leaderboard


Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 10/28/2023 in all areas

  1. 3 points
    Sorry brent, I won't give you any personal details, you should find other friends Good try changing the topic, too. Looks like you've run out of actual arguments, so have a great rest of your weekend!
  2. 1 point
    Actually, I've been told, oddball uncles drive 2009 F-150's with crack windshields and engines that rattle.
  3. 1 point
    Not everyone, thankfully, aspires to stay a Type Zero Civilization. I doubt EV's are the next step to controlling all of the energy coming onto our planet or even a good option for just going to the store. But I'm pretty sure that the future won't be all of us happily tossing wood on a fire to stay warm because Brentonomics pointed out that there are hundreds of years of fire wood available for free and using it up before looking for the next option was smart.
  4. 1 point
    Oh look, a dishonest brent argument again...must be a day that ends in 'y'. Ford is building out factories and production lines for EVs, which is why they're spending a lot and making few EVs (that's why they're building factories, duh). So this random blogger on substack just divided their annual loss associated with these costs with the number of EVs sold (random blogger did it, because Brent can't do maths) and came up with the $60,000 number. It's like building a $1-billion silicon fab, which produces and sells its first chip on December 31st, then these idiots saying that each chip that year was sold at $999.999 million below the cost of production then declaring that the business model isn't sustainable.
  • Newsletter

    Want to keep up to date with all our latest news and information?
    Sign Up