Leaderboard

Hillary’s been covered many times. The FBI with a Republican Director under a Republican President who had pledged to send her to jail investigated for a very long time and found that nothing warranted criminal charges. Hunter’s laptop - who should be charged and with what crimes? Be specific. Biden’s files. Trump was not charged with anything that Biden also did. He wasn’t charged with anything that Pence also did. When Biden and Pence found they had taken some classified files, they gave them back immediately whereas Trump… fuck it, you don’t need me to tell you the difference. You already know what exactly what behaviour lead to Trump being charged, you’re just being obtuse. All I’ll say is “This is still secret. Look, look at this!”

Hi Bill, As I have posted many times; I was a member of the GOP for over 40 yrs. I also never once voted only for R candidates in those elections. Your are weasel-wording and you should simply admit it. Are you sure that you do NOT have a law degree? Jerry Baumchen

Maybe if your posts were less deceptive in construct what you say or believe would be more apparent. "You sound like that, "I did not have sex with that woman" guy. So demanding! It's been said that the louder they are, either they have something to hide or just like to intimidate." Was that more water cooler talk? Another misdirection in advance of stating your vote is none of my business? Well, when of your own volition you said that you have never gone into the box and pulled the R lever when the subject was three Republican presidential candidates you made it a fair inquiry. If you want to keep spinning your hula hoop instead of answering the actual question, that's your call, but please know that circling around to now saying that you are flat denying that you voted only for R candidates in those elections which has nothing to do with your original statement that prompted my original question isn't helpful to your cause.

Not at all equivalent to hunter's laptop. The constitution is less and less important now. Expectantly so since the court has its new biblical makeup.

Trump is being prosecuted because of his blatant attempt to overthrow the constitution. He was not impeached when he should have been and he did not ride off quietly when he lost. He has brought the wrath of the nation’s leaders upon himself.

Well, it seems there's no disgreement even from our GOP and MAGA members on here. Resolved: The GOP is the party for tax cheats.

Ah, whataboutism strikes again. Trump's DOJ found no criminal intent for Hillary and had plenty of opportunity with Hunter and Joe. Even Trump's AG Barr is disgusted with Trump, and the intent to obstruct and deceive is obvious (EVEN TO YOU IF YOU OPEN YOUR EYES).

And they would not have invited him to appear at the courthouse; They would have kicked in the door at Mar-a-Lago at 0500, and taken him into custody immediately.

It would be, Trump would be in pre-trial detention right now if that were the case.

The thing is that the more people there are, then the larger number of them who impact others. Is it OK to drive an unmuffled Harley down the street at 6:00AM? Is it OK to loudly comment on someone who isn’t talking to you to speak English because they’re in America (that’s happened to me). Is it OK to want to legislate so that you, personally, are always comfortable, even if it means that plenty of other people have to modify their behavior (like, for instance, sodomy laws between consenting adults)? Is it OK to say that since your religion forbids certain behaviors, others must also abstain? I don’t think so, personally. I think that consideration is a two-way street, and that I should always think I’m giving more, because kind of like in marriage, if each person thinks they’re giving more than 50%, then most of the stuff is getting done. Wendy P.

Of the people who used to post on wreck, most are out of the sport or dead. It used to be that when one of us died it was skydiving-related, but now it seems more likely that we are succumbing to cancer and such. The half-life in the sport is only a couple of years, and most participants are around no more than 7 years (I should track down the source of those stats). Anyhow, the de-evolution of rec.skydiving was so repellent that many people lost interest in an on-line skydiving community. For the rest of us, DZ.com has taken the place of recdot. All things being considered, I prefer getting banned now and then to putting up with the endless drivel on recdot. It would be nice to have a killfile, however. Blue skies, Winsor

I'm still here!

I posted there, too, even though I wasn't skydiving at the time . I pissed off just about as many people there as I do here. But I quit going there when it got stupid. I'm just not big on the flaming and the FB-type of back-and-forth most of hte time. Wendy P. There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown)

Present and accounted for. I can still manage to create a post that incurs the wrath of some people.