Leaderboard


Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 06/02/2023 in all areas

  1. 2 points
    AAA corporate offices in Lake Mary FL is posting similar content on their social media pages. This hatred will impact FL financially, Gay Days are happening this month as usual, albeit with a decent amount of concern, fear, and anger. It's odd to see such outlandish uproar over REALITY. The obsession with OTHER people's lives is troubling to me.
  2. 2 points
    So? I mean, they boycotted Bud Light over a picture on a can that was never even sold. They boycotted the Little Mermaid over a fictional character being black. They boycotted Target over clothing they didn't sell. You think a little thing like geography is going to stop them?
  3. 2 points
    You really want boil their brains, tell them the real story behind Andersen's tale of mermaids. Andersen wrote it as a love letter to his gay crush who had rejected him and married a woman. https://bookstr.com/article/the-little-mermaid-originally-a-gay-love-letter-to-authors-crush-the-little-mermaid-originally-meant-as-gay-love-letter-to-authors-crush/
  4. 2 points
    Ahh yes, that's what I thought. You didn't actually think, you just followed what you saw on twitter or some other right wing social media site. https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-target-swimsuits-transgender-pride-collection-892500330955 So, turns out that it isn't that "easy" since anti-woke people like you just make shit up to be outraged about. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2023/05/26/no-target-isnt-selling-kids-tuck-friendly-swimsuit-fact-check/70251989007/ https://www.businessinsider.in/retail/news/no-target-didnt-offer-tuck-friendly-bathing-suits-for-kids-here-what-is-and-isnt-part-of-its-pride-celebration-line-/articleshow/100486013.cms https://news.yahoo.com/targets-tuck-friendly-swimsuits-only-161611982.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAADZ-UNs4BHnARvoUt8rmB2OsRVnUnTkE623jbD8c-V0HZVnyO5HRpLQgxYBE_EsWCS5NZKKeHRqNhi6ABy_uEXd6MTLDUEcTQB3K9zDy7yLfBA9XnZKGyAXForpHS0OlmQIb3mzPf1figgRQC2fcQfXTkbpjnE3Ic6ftGkVC3-wB Notice how all these articles have been around for about a week now...and somehow you still have not been able to educate yourself. It should have been easy, cause it is mostly all mentioned in the headline already and we all know you generally are unable to read more than just that.
  5. 1 point
    Hi Everyone: The USPA special election for National Director runs the entire month of June. I am running, and have been trying to get the word out. I am troubled by the fact that only about 6% of the membership voted in the regular election last time. I am also troubled by the fact that this special election isn't even mentioned (as far as I can see) in the June Parachutist magazine that just arrived yesterday. I'm attaching a picture that briefly shows my qualifications and what I hope to accomplish. For more info on either of these topics, you can check out my website Mathewsadventureservices.com or email me at skydivermathews@gmail.com. Thanks for your time. I would really appreciate your vote. David M. Mathews, Ph.D.
  6. 1 point
    The emotional trauma of seeing Bud Light go woke?
  7. 1 point
    I hope you at least get a chuckle out of the irony of posting that under a slide from the Washington Post.
  8. 1 point
    It is why demonizing a group is so important. Makes it so much easier to justify killing them.
  9. 1 point
    This one is going to be difficult for them. Hey Brent, is NASCAR already anti-woke enough to survive this one?
  10. 1 point
    I'd say that this paragraph is an excellent example of the range of "reasonable doubt" when it's someone you identify with, vs. "reasonable doubt" when it's someone you don't identify with. And it's always important to keep that in mind. The reason it's wrong to simply murder people when at war is that it's wrong to simply murder people. And if you find new, fun, ways to dispatch people who are in the way of your (hopefully righteous) mission, then it's also wrong. Wendy P.
  11. 1 point
    For those that want to more, here's a link to his site where he goes into more depth https://www.mathewsadventureservices.com/post/vote-for-david-mathews
  12. 1 point
    I already jump at a regular DZ that is supportive of it and seems to be able to do it without issue. There are rules in place to limit turns to 90 degrees on height loads and you have to do hop and pops to do bigger turns or run the pond. You have to do a Flight-1 course to run the pond and people do regular canopy courses. It works just fine and we have regular canopy piloting competitions, including ones for beginners, attended by spectators. There is a real culture of learning to fly your canopy and we often have entire caravan loads of hop and pops. If you guys are unable to organise a piss up in a brewery by putting similar safeguards in place then I guess complaining about swooping and trying to eradicate it are the only options available to you.
  13. 1 point
    Yes, I know who Ammerman is, which is why I posted the Portland ATC guy: 305 was right on top of him and the accuracy would have been damn near spot on. As for Ammerman, he very clearly stated at CC last year, sitting just a few feet from me, that Flight 305 never left the confines of V-23 and if it had he would have alerted someone.
  • Newsletter

    Want to keep up to date with all our latest news and information?
    Sign Up