That's some major pot stirring there, whoever you may be! Well, I'll take a bite....
Interesting to see these "secret" things about the USPA be opened up to view.
While the PDF above has a pages of legalize about why the USPA is obligated to pay up the $150,000 as agreed, it all came about because of the stuff described below:
(Which must be about the Lodi tandem fatality and all the shady stuff going on there when it comes to fake certifications of instructors.)
Mr. G sued the USPA, the court sent it to Mediation and came to an initial sort-of agreement, but the USPA wanted one more change, but Mr G didn't agree. The court then decided that the initial agreement was legally an agreement. So the USPA had agreed to pay the $150,000.
Part of the deal was also confidentiality on both parties -- One of those things that's common in the legal world but often seems really slimy to someone not in that profession. The case involves the USPA and so USPA members should have a right to know if something got screwed up, that's costing their organization.
I have no dog in this fight but just wanted to summarize what's hidden away in the PDF. Others are free to do a better job.
Anyone got a link to the old Lodi fatality thread, or some thread that gets into whatever license suspensions took place, and all that mess with Tandem Instructors having to requalify because their instructor wasn't considered to have been properly rated?
One thing I'm wondering about is the statement:
I suppose that has been previously established, and agreed to by the USPA prior to the court case? Is there info to that effect available publicly?
It sounds like the USPA was pretty upset with all the Lodi stuff, and in effect did an "emergency revocation" of ratings.... but didn't pull out the manual to do so in the prescribed manner, allowing the defendant to make a proper defense.