Leaderboard

A subset of ‘sealioning’ known as ‘Tuckering’ is basically just sealioning while looking like you just smelled a nasty fart.

Counterpoint - it would be very dumb to publically release that footage from a security perspective, as it would give a future wannabe attacker very useful information about sightlines for the camera.

Right or wrong, I also tend to presume that someone who writes crudely is probably not educated enough (or in the right ways) to produce defensible research. Flip side, I also think the intra-family sniping on these Cooper boards hinders the progress of the case, if there's actually any to be made. I gave up on this board in particular when every day featured 15 new long diatribes by and against a particular poster, even as I was pretty interested in what (for example) Flyjack had to say about certain elements I was curious about. Just ignore each other's static and focus on the data. Easy for me to say from the outside, I know. But that's also the point: the outside is where the new perspectives will come from.

They love Donald Trump, who is about the biggest, sorest loser there is.

You also have a vote: the most distressing bit in my opinion.

Nobody's saying what you're supposed to believe. I'd just like to point out, that incompetence on the part of those monitoring him is a far simpler explanation than a detailed, planned shadowy assassination. Also, is losing sleep the only criterion for being desperate? I'd put mental gymnastics as a good indicator.

Bullshit again. Remember S Carolina? From Wikipedia (which confirms my memory) Im sure the next response will be something along the lines of “that wasn’t the party,” but Bush was the desired candidate; the rest was just theater to get there. McCain was an upset victory in NH. Its all about the narrative. Its possible to find negative information about any person (probably even Mother Teresa was mean to someone once). Chickenshit is taking that negative out of context. Wendy P.

She's probably lying about being a Democrat,too.

When people say 'me and X' vs the correct form: "X and I" it makes me wonder about their educational background as a clue to their research competency ? Any significant deficit has consequences and may show itself in people's work.... like yours. Dont worry Robert. Nothing is going to change. The Vortex is generally immune to change. The radical nonsense will continue so you are safe to kvetch for as long as you live. Only you would bring this up vs presenting real research on a DB Cooper site! That goes to your social priorities and your agenda. That may indicate your work is all fucked up too!

You and Bill Barr, puppets for trump. Mueller spent almost 200 pages describing “numerous links between the Russian government and the Trump Campaign.” He found that “a Russian entity carried out a social media campaign that favored presidential candidate Donald J. Trump and disparaged presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.” He also found that “a Russian intelligence service conducted computer-intrusion operations” against the Clinton campaign and then released stolen documents. While Mueller was unable to establish a conspiracy between members of the Trump campaign and the Russians involved in this activity, he made it clear that “[a] statement that the investigation did not establish particular facts does not mean there was no evidence of those facts.” In fact, Mueller also wrote that the “investigation established that the Russian government perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency and worked to secure that outcome, and that the Campaign expected it would benefit electorally from information stolen and released through Russian efforts.” Refusing to testify or answer questions is prima facie. How Bill Barr Turned the Justice Department Into a Cover-up Operation for Trump trump and the GOP took the US from 18th to 27th on the world corruption rankings.

Wait, I thought you’re not saying anything was faked? Grow a fucking spine and say what you fucking think. You have the gall to talk about useful idiots when you’re doing nothing but spreading conspiracist bollocks?

Also consider that we grow a new generation of young skydivers every 2 or 3 years and every new generation needs to hear the same bloody lessons anew. It is also important to include a bit of history or theory to help the lecture sink in. Young jumpers need to hear that they are standing on the bloody shoulders of older skydivers who learned bloody lessons the hard way. The old military, authoritarian approach no longer works with younger skydivers as they need to be motivated and they expect to have some of the "whys" explained.

John McCain would very possibly have won if he hadn’t chosen a “fuck you liberals” running mate. Not a good look for bringing us together. In 2000 the Republicans had the opportunity to nominate him and look how he was treated. Wendy P.

They grow out of cow patties for free. Who needs a law?

First, you have no right to see the video. A clip would have to be released with the Pelosi’s consent or leaked. And I can quite easily understand why placating you isn’t Nancy’s priority right now. Second, you can’t play both sides on this. You are who you say needs to be shut down. You are talking about yourself.

I think this is a perfect example of the current assault on democracy because it’s rooted in a fundamental refusal of one side to accept reality. I heard an example recently that you can’t have legitimate political discourse anymore when this happens. We can all disagree on solutions and policies and that’s fine, no matter whether a policy is good or bad we can talk about it. But where we used to have one side saying they want a traffic light on this road and one side saying they don’t, now we have one side saying they want a traffic light and the other side saying the road doesn’t exist. In this case we have the Pelosi’s, the SF PD, the Capitol PD and the suspect himself saying he broke into the Pelosi’s home to kidnap Nancy. It’s true. It happened. And the right say it’s faked. Or if it’s not faked he was Paul’s male hooker. Or if he wasn’t a hooker he was let in the house first then tried to break out. Or if it wasn’t that it was something else - because the only thing we know for sure is that what every single person involved says is the truth isn’t the truth. What do you do with that? How do you talk to that? Like with Epstein. There isn’t a Republican alive who hasn’t voted against prison reform, or any funding to stop them from turning into overcrowded, understaffed and under resourced hellscapes yet when an at risk prisoner is failed by chronically overworked staff who just don’t give a fuck anymore they’re shocked that the system doesn’t work perfectly and the only explanation must be a Clinton conspiracy. It’s utter bullshit.